Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 3:24 PM, Doohickie said: I want some of what you're smoking. Expand Nothing ... it's all haram. 1 1 Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 I knew in your case that's true... it's an expression of speech. 1 1 Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 3:44 PM, Doohickie said: I knew in your case that's true... it's an expression of speech. Expand I know that you knew and I know the expression. 😉 Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 3:46 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: I know that you knew and I know the expression. 😉 Expand I know that you knew that I knew that you knew that I knew that you knew the expression. 1 1 Quote
Thorner Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 11:55 AM, freester said: No evidence whatsoever that Terry not Botterill was responsible for the horrible Skinner contract. People love to blame the Pegulas when it was the incompetent GMs who caused the Sabres to be in the position where there at. You can blame the. Pegulas for hiring the 3 incompetent GMs and that is fair Expand Disagree. It's been reported that Botterill was against LT deals and that Pegula was the instigator behind both the Eichel deal and Skinner's. On 7/4/2021 at 2:43 PM, SDS said: Skinner’s slump started a 1/4 season prior to his contract. It was just overlooked. Expand After he got hurt, yes. 1 Quote
Thorner Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 (edited) @freester https://www.nhltradetalk.com/real-reason-for-sabres-changes-where-pegulas-and-botterill-butted-heads/ See Elliote Friedman's reporting: “I don’t think Botterill wanted to give Jack Eichel that contract and ownership said “we’re doing it”. And I don’t think Botterill wanted to give Jeff Skinner that deal. I think what Botterill wanted to do was offer big money for a low term. … Jason Botterill, from what I heard, is not a “term guy”. He says too many teams get burned by those mistakes and I think he was overruled. I think what they’re looking at right here is: There’s a finite amount of time here before Eichel says “I had enough.”” Edited July 4, 2021 by Thorny Quote
Marvin Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 5:06 PM, Thorny said: @freester https://www.nhltradetalk.com/real-reason-for-sabres-changes-where-pegulas-and-botterill-butted-heads/ See Elliote Friedman's reporting: “I don’t think Botterill wanted to give Jack Eichel that contract and ownership said “we’re doing it”. And I don’t think Botterill wanted to give Jeff Skinner that deal. I think what Botterill wanted to do was offer big money for a low term. … Jason Botterill, from what I heard, is not a “term guy”. He says too many teams get burned by those mistakes and I think he was overruled. I think what they’re looking at right here is: There’s a finite amount of time here before Eichel says “I had enough.”” Expand I would say Terry went 1-for-2. The Eichel deal, if he wanted to stay here, looks like fricking genius. The Skinner deal looks like idiocy. This is why XGMJB getting a free pass from the NHL old boys club puzzles me. He was flat out wrong in diagnosing O'Reilly as part of the problem here. (IMHO, you blame XGMJB for wanting to move O'Reilly and TP for wanting it done before the bonus was paid.) IMHO, he was right about Evander Kane not being right for the youth. He was the yahoo who wanted Kreuger first. He was wrong on the Eichel contract. He was right about the Skinner contract. He could not get more than two and change useful lines for his coaches. His drafts looks solid so far. That is a very mixed bag. How he gets absolved of all of the gaffes just baffles me. 1 Quote
Pimlach Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 3:20 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: I really believe that both will be Sabres long-term. Jack has a contract and I believe Samson will be signed to a cap friendly 7, or 8, year deal. Expand They want out. Eichel may be stuck, he is on contract. Sam will be gone soon. He has one year left and he has to desire to stay. Quote
nfreeman Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 5:23 PM, Marvin, Sabres Fan said: I would say Terry went 1-for-2. The Eichel deal, if he wanted to stay here, looks like fricking genius. The Skinner deal looks like idiocy. This is why XGMJB getting a free pass from the NHL old boys club puzzles me. He was flat out wrong in diagnosing O'Reilly as part of the problem here. (IMHO, you blame XGMJB for wanting to move O'Reilly and TP for wanting it done before the bonus was paid.) IMHO, he was right about Evander Kane not being right for the youth. He was the yahoo who wanted Kreuger first. He was wrong on the Eichel contract. He was right about the Skinner contract. He could not get more than two and change useful lines for his coaches. His drafts looks solid so far. That is a very mixed bag. How he gets absolved of all of the gaffes just baffles me. Expand And goaltending!! 1 Quote
Marvin Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 5:31 PM, nfreeman said: And goaltending!! Expand Ack! Yeah, how could I have forgotten that? Quote
Thorner Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 5:23 PM, Marvin, Sabres Fan said: I would say Terry went 1-for-2. The Eichel deal, if he wanted to stay here, looks like fricking genius. The Skinner deal looks like idiocy. This is why XGMJB getting a free pass from the NHL old boys club puzzles me. He was flat out wrong in diagnosing O'Reilly as part of the problem here. (IMHO, you blame XGMJB for wanting to move O'Reilly and TP for wanting it done before the bonus was paid.) IMHO, he was right about Evander Kane not being right for the youth. He was the yahoo who wanted Kreuger first. He was wrong on the Eichel contract. He was right about the Skinner contract. He could not get more than two and change useful lines for his coaches. His drafts looks solid so far. That is a very mixed bag. How he gets absolved of all of the gaffes just baffles me. Expand So in the end, we look at the record. And the record was bad. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 5:25 PM, Pimlach said: They want out. Eichel may be stuck, he is on contract. Sam will be gone soon. He has one year left and he has to desire to stay. Expand Have either of them actually said that they want out? I have not seen a report, or heard a report of that. Samson is RFA now. His contract expired on July 1st, no? Quote
Pimlach Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 6:07 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: Have either of them actually said that they want out? I have not seen a report, or heard a report of that. Samson is RFA now. His contract expired on July 1st, no? Expand To my knowledge there are no direct quotes from Jack saying it, but this is the 2nd off season in a row that he and KA are in “discussions”, I highly doubt they are very positive given KA’s “we want people that want to be here” mantra. Eichel not listening to Sabres/Bills or his own original doctors is a ploy to force a trade. Sam is an RFA in 2021. If we doesn’t sign an offer sheet somewhere, or extend with us, then he will be gone next season. Sam did not say he wanted out but he sure didn’t say he wanted to stay. He did say he cannot do another rebuild, which is where we seem to be. He said something like they will did with it later, another time. Everyone knows they both want out. Quote
pi2000 Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 6:07 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: Have either of them actually said that they want out? I have not seen a report, or heard a report of that. Samson is RFA now. His contract expired on July 1st, no? Expand The only hint from Eichel was in his season ending presser when he said his main goal this offseason was to get healthy and be ready to play "wherever that may be". When asked if he'll ask for a trade Samson said "that stuff is all going to get figured out when the time comes". Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 2:40 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: Mostly, if not all, without Jack. That's the big difference. Expand Shouldn't a guy making his money bring offense to the team? Your basically saying Skinner needs everything teed up for him. 1 Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 9:28 PM, PromoTheRobot said: Shouldn't a guy making his money bring offense to the team? Your basically saying Skinner needs everything teed up for him. Expand Skinner is a goal scorer that needs to be fed the puck. Alwasys has been and always will be. He was brought in here to score goals off a good feed from a good setup man. He will not create goals on his own and rarely sets them up for someone else. He's a finisher. Quote
nfreeman Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 2:58 PM, Eleven said: I agree with all of this, but who's going to be the center feeding Skinner the puck? Expand On 7/4/2021 at 3:08 PM, freester said: He won’t be successful without a quality Center. Jack barely played and was not healthy, Staal is a 4th line Center that we put on the 2nd line. I don’t feel that we currently have a first or second line quality center if we move Reinhart and Jack. Expand I don't disagree that Skinner needs a real NHL center, but at the same time I thought his goal-scoring decline was not due to lack of chances generated by his center as much as it was a failure by him to make the elite in-tight moves to bury his chances that he was able to convert a couple of seasons ago. I think that is mostly about confidence and feeling it and maybe DG can help him get it back. 2 Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 4, 2021 Report Posted July 4, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 9:28 PM, PromoTheRobot said: Shouldn't a guy making his money bring offense to the team? Your basically saying Skinner needs everything teed up for him. Expand Skinner is not a conventional talent. To deploy him as such is to waste that talent. Krueger had no idea what to do with Skinner. Krueger was not about to change his system to better utilize any player. Granato didn't try hard to revitalize Skinner either. It might have been because he was too focused on given younger players better minutes to develop their offense. I hope in the coming season he tries to maximize Skinner's production. Jack is so crazy good that he could adjust to Skinner's style. If we don't have Jack I'm not sure anyone else can get the best out of him. Maybe if they work hard on it, Mitts and Skinner could develop some chemistry. 1 Quote
Doohicksie Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) I kind of have a feeling that once the roster is set, Granado will turn the "we want players who want to be here" mantra around, and convince each and every one one of the players that they are here because the Sabres want them on the team. To feel wanted will improve morale and confidence. The one thing that seems common among recent Sabres coaches is a certain level of aloofness. Except for Nolan, every coach since Lindy has been kind of a reserved academic type of personality, and they seemed to put on airs that they knew more than everyone else. Perhaps is because they didn't feel like they had the players to work with. Rolston, Bylsma, Housley and Krueger all seemed frustrated because the players (aside from Jack and Sam once they got here) weren't the right players. Granato took the players he had and made something out of them. And he convinced the young guys that they could live up to the vision of themselves that Granato provided them. Mitts really is a top six center. Tage really is a finisher with a great shot and a physical side. Asplund really is a high quality offensive-minded forechecker. Dahlin really is that generational talent the Sabres drafted. Where all the other recent coaches had a system they insisted the team play, Granato identifies a role for each player, a role where they can succeed. And he worked with them to develop into those roles. He sees potential and hones it into a finished product. Other coaches just saw the deficiencies. Edited July 5, 2021 by Doohickie 1 1 Quote
kas23 Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 On 7/4/2021 at 6:40 PM, Pimlach said: Sam is an RFA in 2021. If we doesn’t sign an offer sheet somewhere, or extend with us, then he will be gone next season. Expand Hypothetical question. If a team offer sheets Sam and he signs it, but then we match it, is he obligated to sign with us for that money and term? If he is, and he doesn’t wish to stay (under any circumstance), he probably won’t sign any offer sheets. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 On 7/5/2021 at 12:30 AM, kas23 said: Hypothetical question. If a team offer sheets Sam and he signs it, but then we match it, is he obligated to sign with us for that money and term? If he is, and he doesn’t wish to stay (under any circumstance), he probably won’t sign any offer sheets. Expand Everybody has a price. Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 On 7/5/2021 at 12:30 AM, kas23 said: Hypothetical question. If a team offer sheets Sam and he signs it, but then we match it, is he obligated to sign with us for that money and term? If he is, and he doesn’t wish to stay (under any circumstance), he probably won’t sign any offer sheets. Expand Any offer sheet an rfa signs, his team can match and keep him. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 (edited) On 7/5/2021 at 2:28 AM, LGR4GM said: Any offer sheet an rfa signs, his team can match and keep him. Expand Which is what @kas23 is getting at ... if the Sabres match Samson, or whatever player, has no choice in the matter and has to stay a Sabre for whatever $ and term was in the offer sheet. And I agree with @kas23 that if Samson has no desire to stay then it is very unlikely that he will sign any offer sheet. He may gamble, if it is an outragous offer and he really likes the team making the offer, that the Sabres would not match. Edited July 5, 2021 by New Scotland (NS) Quote
PromoTheRobot Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 On 7/5/2021 at 1:36 PM, New Scotland (NS) said: Which is what @kas23 is getting at ... if the Sabres match Samson, or whatever player, has no choice in the matter and has to stay a Sabre for whatever $ and term was in the offer sheet. And I agree with @kas23 that if Samson has no desire to stay then it is very unlikely that he will sign any offer sheet. He may gamble, if it is an outragous offer and he really likes the team making the offer, that the Sabres would not match. Expand If the Sabres decline is there compensation? Sam was 1st round pick. Don't we get a couple #1s back? I remember the Vanek offer sheet from EDM could have netted the Sabres 4 #1s. In hindsight that would have been the play. But Buffalo had just let Briere and Drury walk. Letting Vanek leave would have caused the fanbase to riot. Quote
Eleven Posted July 5, 2021 Report Posted July 5, 2021 On 7/5/2021 at 2:21 PM, PromoTheRobot said: If the Sabres decline is there compensation? Sam was 1st round pick. Don't we get a couple #1s back? I remember the Vanek offer sheet from EDM could have netted the Sabres 4 #1s. In hindsight that would have been the play. But Buffalo had just let Briere and Drury walk. Letting Vanek leave would have caused the fanbase to riot. Expand It's based upon the amount of the offer. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.