Taro T Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/27/2021 at 11:09 PM, inkman said: I think I’m 3 generations older than that Expand Close. 2. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 12:27 AM, Zamboni said: Gen Z, iGen, or Centennials: Born 1996 – TBD Millennials or Gen Y: Born 1977 – 1995 Generation X: Born 1965 – 1976 Baby Boomers: Born 1946 – 1964 Traditionalists or Silent Generation: Born 1945 and before yea, I’m a Gen X ‘er Expand I think Xers are a bit broader than that. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 Couldn’t find the RaKru system thread, so I’ll plunk this here: 1 Quote
Taro T Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 3:08 AM, That Aud Smell said: I think Xers are a bit broader than that. Expand Nope. The "baby bust" was pretty short lived (in relative terms). Quote
Taro T Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 (edited) On 1/28/2021 at 12:26 PM, That Aud Smell said: Couldn’t find the RaKru system thread, so I’ll plunk this here: Expand And that chart supports what we're seeing for the Sabres. Except for the 1st game (and particularly the 1st period of that game) and some odd stretches w/in the other games, the Sabres have been as good or better than their opponents as far as carrying the play. But the Sabres bury fewer of their ES chances & the goalies have had 1-2 bad goals let in nearly every game. If that's "puck luck" the Sabres should be poised to go on a tear. If it's due to the Sabres goalies not being good enough, we'll likely see them hover around 0.500 all season or just below. Edited January 28, 2021 by Taro T 4 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 12:27 AM, Zamboni said: Millennials or Gen Y: Born 1977 – 1995 Generation X: Born 1965 – 1976 Expand On 1/28/2021 at 3:08 AM, That Aud Smell said: I think Xers are a bit broader than that. Expand On 1/28/2021 at 12:58 PM, Taro T said: Nope. The "baby bust" was pretty short lived (in relative terms). Expand I'm putting X more toward 1980, is all. I don't place millennials in the 70s, either. Quote
matter2003 Posted January 28, 2021 Author Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:04 PM, Taro T said: And that chart supports what we're seeing for the Sabres. Except for the 1st game (and particularly the 1st period of that game) and some odd stretches w/in the other games, the Sabres have been as good or better than their opponents as far as carrying the play. But the Sabres bury fewer of their ES chances & the goalies have had 1-2 bad goals let in nearly every game. If that's "puck luck" the Sabres should be poised to go on a tear. If it's due to the Sabres goalies not being good enough, we'll likely see them hover around 0.500 all season or just below. Expand As do the other analytics. There is no way to be ranked that high in virtually every analytic category without being a pretty good team. When they get some puck luck they could go on a run and potentially start dominating teams. 3 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:04 PM, Taro T said: And that chart supports what we're seeing for the Sabres. Expand Agreed. It's nice when the stats line up with what you're seeing, or what you think you're seeing, anyway. It does surprise me a bit that the quality of shots surrendered is so low -- they just seem scrambly or sloppy at times (maybe just inopportune times). Quote
Zamboni Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:23 PM, That Aud Smell said: I'm putting X more toward 1980, is all. I don't place millennials in the 70s, either. Expand Ok well, that’s your own personal gauge. Not what’s generally “accepted” as the generation labels. 😂 Quote
Taro T Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:25 PM, That Aud Smell said: Agreed. It's nice when the stats line up with what you're seeing, or what you think you're seeing, anyway. It does surprise me a bit that the quality of shots surrendered is so low -- they just seem scrambly or sloppy at times (maybe just inopportune times). Expand They do seem "scrambly" at times, but they really aren't giving up those shots from the slot nearly as often as in years past. Miller's shot w/ 6 or so seconds left in the 1st should've been harmless & the type of shot that you don't mind too much giving up. (Ideally, you don't want to give up any, but that's not happening & a fairly unscreened shot from right at the BL should be stopped 99+ times out of 100.) Even last year's team would've let that goal sink them. They fought back & after the game the Rags studio analyst was saying he knew they were going to lose when the 3rd period started. Nice to be on the opposite side of that for once, though unlike him, yours truly wasn't close to convinced the Sabres would definitely kill off Hall's penalty. Quote
Curt Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:26 PM, Zamboni said: Ok well, that’s your own personal gauge. Not what’s generally “accepted” as the generation labels. 😂 Expand Where are you getting your generally “accepted” information from? I agree with @That Aud Smell 1 1 Quote
Zamboni Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:53 PM, Curt said: Where are you getting your generally “accepted” information from? I agree with @That Aud Smell Expand https://genhq.com/faq-info-about-generations/ https://www.parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/style/generation-names-and-years-a-cheat-sheet-for-parents/ https://www.careerplanner.com/Career-Articles/Generations.cfm http://www.wmfc.org/uploads/GenerationalDifferencesChart.pdf There are some slight differences depending on what source, but it’s generally the same. Meh, believe or go by whatever source one feels comfortable with 🤷♂️ Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 Advanced analytics say this team's goaltending is bad. 1 Quote
WildCard Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 3:07 PM, LGR4GM said: Advanced analytics say this team's goaltending is bad. Expand Very bad Quote
DarthEbriate Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 3:08 AM, That Aud Smell said: I think Xers are a bit broader than that. Expand Previously, I think it was. Back in the 90s-00s it seemed like Gen X went well into the '80s. And it's been shrinking/being pushed earlier ever since. On 1/28/2021 at 12:27 AM, Zamboni said: After the dark times, have been immersed in Star Wars as cultural norm since the Special Editions: Born 1996 – TBD Grew up on Star Wars on VHS: Born 1977 – 1995 Remember Star Wars in theaters: Born 1965 – 1976 Created Star Wars and purchased it for their kids: Born 1946 – 1964 Wars were World-Based and not Star-Based: Born 1945 and before Expand The list may not look like much, but it follows a timeline. I made some special modifications myself. 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 1:26 PM, Zamboni said: Ok well, that’s your own personal gauge. Not what’s generally “accepted” as the generation labels. 😂 Expand I go with places like Pew Research, and my own sense things. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 12:27 AM, Zamboni said: Gen Z, iGen, or Centennials: Born 1996 – TBD Millennials or Gen Y: Born 1977 – 1995 Generation X: Born 1965 – 1976 Baby Boomers: Born 1946 – 1964 Traditionalists or Silent Generation: Born 1945 and before yea, I’m a Gen X ‘er Expand Millennials are 1982 -1997. Old enough to remember 9/11. Young enough to remember the NES or PS1 or Sega Genesis. Quote
spndnchz Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/27/2021 at 4:46 PM, inkman said: This is a response from a human bean, this post is barely legible in dark theme. Expand Noted Quote
Weave Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 3:21 PM, LGR4GM said: Our goaltending sucks. Expand Based on these we should be clammoring for a MAF trade. Quote
inkman Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/28/2021 at 5:10 PM, Weave said: Based on these we should be clammoring for a MAF trade. Expand Or any sort of upgrade really. Quote
Stoner Posted January 28, 2021 Report Posted January 28, 2021 I'd feel better if A. Analytics was saying the Sabres might be very good in the standings eventually vs. it saying the Sabres might be very good (at the time of the post) despite a middling record. Quote
matter2003 Posted January 28, 2021 Author Report Posted January 28, 2021 (edited) On 1/28/2021 at 1:26 PM, Zamboni said: Ok well, that’s your own personal gauge. Not what’s generally “accepted” as the generation labels. 😂 Expand Can we please stop the thread hijacking? That's definitely Boomer style. 😉 Edited January 28, 2021 by matter2003 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.