Paul Hamilton back on WGR for Sabres Coverage

[That Aud Smell]

21 hours ago, Taro T said:

Hamilton picks his storyline & stays with it, regardless of how the terrain might change.

I think this is generally correct. I've seen him alter course slightly, at times. I mean - we are all biased by our interpretation of events as they unfold. Those interpretations inevitably influence how we understand subsequent events. Hamilton's biases are just really significant, IMO, and he isn't able (or just doesn't want) to adjust for them. 

21 hours ago, dudacek said:

Was watching a presser with my wife in the room and she pipes up "what's up with that guy? Is he asking a question or telling a story?"

He's not the only sports reporter who does this. I think it's a function of the fact that they write a lot of their copy while the game's ongoing, and then look for players or coaches to endorse what they wrote.

[JoeSchmoe]

10 hours ago, Zamboni said:

Yea Hammy is the “hot pockets” of sports reporters. He’s not good. 

Haha! 

My take is that people like hot pockets, but won't publically admit it (kind of like PHam 🙂 ).

[JohnC]

Paul Hamilton was on WGR for a 15 minute segment with Howard Simon and Jeremy White talking about the Sabres. Some of the topics dealt with Cozens and Quinn. When asked about the team's playoff chances he brought up the issue of whether any teams will be dropping off. 

Howard And Jeremy | RADIO.COM