dudacek Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 For those who don't look at sabrespace front page, check out this intriguing article from Forbes magazine: https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2020/11/09/the-buffalo-sabres-sports-science-push-offers-a-glimpse-of-the-nhls-data-driven-future/?sh=561878224466 1 2 Quote
matter2003 Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 47 minutes ago, dudacek said: For those who don't look at sabrespace front page, check out this intriguing article from Forbes magazine: https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2020/11/09/the-buffalo-sabres-sports-science-push-offers-a-glimpse-of-the-nhls-data-driven-future/?sh=561878224466 Not surprised, the Bills have led the way with a lot of these things in the NFL since McDermott took over. Quote
Eleven Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 (edited) Very interesting--thanks. Edited November 10, 2020 by Eleven Quote
Taro T Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, dudacek said: For those who don't look at sabrespace front page, check out this intriguing article from Forbes magazine: https://www.forbes.com/sites/justinbirnbaum/2020/11/09/the-buffalo-sabres-sports-science-push-offers-a-glimpse-of-the-nhls-data-driven-future/?sh=561878224466 Was wondering why they loved Irwin so much. 😉 Edited November 10, 2020 by Taro T Quote
IKnowPhysics Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 They're trying. Which good, because if they weren't trying, they'd be fools. The future is enormous amounts of real-time biometric, kinematic, and positional data generated by wireless on-player hardware automatically processed and boiled down (by software written by sports scientists) into factors the coaches may use to help make decisions in game situations, fitness/training/conditioning, recovery, tactics/strategy, etc. 1 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 10, 2020 Report Posted November 10, 2020 It's interesting, but if they've "been on the cutting edge" since 2015 it might be the wrong edge, and it might be time to cauterize the wound. 4 Quote
Mustache of God Posted November 11, 2020 Report Posted November 11, 2020 "After running the data through the tubes and triple checking our findings we advise you load up on right handed defensemen, sign Jimmy Vesey and then trade for Frolik". 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 11, 2020 Report Posted November 11, 2020 Speaking of cutting edge, there's rumblings here and there about some teams thinking of trying 3 D men and 2 forwards at times this year. It's an interesting idea, and maybe when we had all those D men we should have been on that cutting edge. I mean we already used Risto in front on the PP. I don't think we will do this now, but last year, it might have been an idea given how crap our 3rd line forwards were. Quote
IKnowPhysics Posted November 11, 2020 Report Posted November 11, 2020 2 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: rumblings here and there about some teams thinking of trying 3 D men Source? Quote
Taro T Posted November 11, 2020 Report Posted November 11, 2020 3 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Speaking of cutting edge, there's rumblings here and there about some teams thinking of trying 3 D men and 2 forwards at times this year. It's an interesting idea, and maybe when we had all those D men we should have been on that cutting edge. I mean we already used Risto in front on the PP. I don't think we will do this now, but last year, it might have been an idea given how crap our 3rd line forwards were. It didn't work when the Jets toyed with it after the Ducks-Whimpley trade. Don't see any reason to expect it to work any better now. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 12, 2020 Report Posted November 12, 2020 2 hours ago, IKnowPhysics said: Source? eg: https://www.thestar.com/sports/leafs/opinion/2020/11/07/what-if-the-maple-leafs-experimented-with-three-defencemen-and-two-forwards-its-worth-a-shot.html 1 hour ago, Taro T said: It didn't work when the Jets toyed with it after the Ducks-Whimpley trade. Don't see any reason to expect it to work any better now. I suppose it depends on your personnel. Perhaps some of these new age coaches and analysts are looking at the unique way 3 on 3 gets played and see trends in general and thus want to toy with it. Perhaps it comes from Tampa dressing 7 D throughout the playoffs (even though I know they used 3 actual lines). I dunno, I've just read about it being discussed by the Leafs and Bruins whether or not someone actually tries it remains to be seen but bubble hockey might be the time to experiment on anything. Quote
Marvin Posted November 13, 2020 Report Posted November 13, 2020 On 11/11/2020 at 3:29 PM, PerreaultForever said: Speaking of cutting edge, there's rumblings here and there about some teams thinking of trying 3 D men and 2 forwards at times this year. It's an interesting idea, and maybe when we had all those D men we should have been on that cutting edge. I mean we already used Risto in front on the PP. I don't think we will do this now, but last year, it might have been an idea given how crap our 3rd line forwards were. Punch Imlach was known to protect leads with two forwards and three defencemen. (I have watched enough parts of old games from the 1930's until I started watching hockey in 1970 to have seen numerous other teams use this tactic.) Roger Nielson regularly used defencemen (looked it up: particularly Dean Hutchison) with Darryl Sittler and Lanny MacDonald to relieve them of defencive responsibilities until they matured and learnt the NHL game. I remember reading that one of the reasons players like Jimmy Roberts, Murray Wilson, Red Kelly, and Jerry Korab played both forward and defence is that their teams could play a third forward when protecting a lead or stand in front of the net on the power play. 1 Quote
Broken Ankles Posted November 13, 2020 Report Posted November 13, 2020 On 11/10/2020 at 2:32 PM, PerreaultForever said: It's interesting, but if they've "been on the cutting edge" since 2015 it might be the wrong edge, and it might be time to cauterize the wound. I was fascinated as well until I read 2015. I envision this is the pitch to Monty.....errrrrrr Terry. 1 Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 13, 2020 Report Posted November 13, 2020 3 hours ago, Marvin, Sabres Fan said: Punch Imlach was known to protect leads with two forwards and three defencemen. (I have watched enough parts of old games from the 1930's until I started watching hockey in 1970 to have seen numerous other teams use this tactic.) Roger Nielson regularly used defencemen (looked it up: particularly Dean Hutchison) with Darryl Sittler and Lanny MacDonald to relieve them of defencive responsibilities until they matured and learnt the NHL game. I remember reading that one of the reasons players like Jimmy Roberts, Murray Wilson, Red Kelly, and Jerry Korab played both forward and defence is that their teams could play a third forward when protecting a lead or stand in front of the net on the power play. You're forgetting Scotty Bowman. Did it with Lindy Ruff. Using a D man as a forward was usually to add toughness up front in those days. I think this idea is a little different. It likely comes out of how much D men lead the rush now and I suppose instead of having forwards rotate back to cover for them, the third D man would do that. I'm just guessing . Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.