gilbert11 Posted July 14, 2020 Report Posted July 14, 2020 Hello, GM Adams? You there? Did the Islanders still have the rights to Sorokin after 6 years? I read they signed him to an entry level contract for this year, even though he can’t play, so he became a Restricted Free Agent to sign for next season. Dude had Save % .93 and above for the last 3 KHL seasons. With the KHL play being very wide open, that’s really damn good. Would a smart GM work behind the scenes to make a deal for the rights to a Sorokin so they could sign him? Quote
dudacek Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, gilbert11 said: Hello, GM Adams? You there? Did the Islanders still have the rights to Sorokin after 6 years? I read they signed him to an entry level contract for this year, even though he can’t play, so he became a Restricted Free Agent to sign for next season. Dude had Save % .93 and above for the last 3 KHL seasons. With the KHL play being very wide open, that’s really damn good. Would a smart GM work behind the scenes to make a deal for the rights to a Sorokin so they could sign him? Wasn’t Sorokin exclusive rights to the Islanders? We had as much of shot at signing him as we do Lafreniere. Edited July 15, 2020 by dudacek Quote
Curt Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 14 minutes ago, gilbert11 said: Hello, GM Adams? You there? Did the Islanders still have the rights to Sorokin after 6 years? I read they signed him to an entry level contract for this year, even though he can’t play, so he became a Restricted Free Agent to sign for next season. Dude had Save % .93 and above for the last 3 KHL seasons. With the KHL play being very wide open, that’s really damn good. Would a smart GM work behind the scenes to make a deal for the rights to a Sorokin so they could sign him? I believe that the Islanders did in fact still hold his rights. Quote
gilbert11 Posted July 15, 2020 Author Report Posted July 15, 2020 4 minutes ago, dudacek said: Wasn’t Sorokin exclusive rights to the Islanders? We had as much of shot at signing him as we do Lafreniere. That’s what I was asking. The Islanders drafted him in 2014. I thought there was like a 3 year window to sign drafted players. Quote
dudacek Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 4 minutes ago, gilbert11 said: That’s what I was asking. The Islanders drafted him in 2014. I thought there was like a 3 year window to sign drafted players. Two years junior and four years college. I thought Europe is four years as well, so you raise a good question. Maybe they can retain his rights by offering him a contract, even if he doesn’t sign? That Kaprizov kid the Wild just signed might fit the same scenarios. Quote
rakish Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 I read recently that KHL draft picks retain rights forever, I really don't know much about it. Quote
Brawndo Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 45 minutes ago, rakish said: I read recently that KHL draft picks retain rights forever, I really don't know much about it. This is true the Sabres still hold the rights to Artyom Kryukov who was their First Round Pick in 2000 at 15th Overall. He remained in the KHL and retired after the 2015-16 Season. 1 Quote
inkman Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 1 minute ago, Brawndo said: This is true the Sabres still hold the rights to Artyom Kryukov who was their First Round Pick in 2000 at 15th Overall. He remained in the KHL and retired after the 2015-16 Season. ? Quote
shrader Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 (edited) If they signed him to an ELC last year, draft pick rights are no longer a question here since he has an NHL contract already. edit: Oops I misread that part about when the contract was signed. Edited July 15, 2020 by shrader Quote
Broken Ankles Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 1 hour ago, Brawndo said: This is true the Sabres still hold the rights to Artyom Kryukov who was their First Round Pick in 2000 at 15th Overall. He remained in the KHL and retired after the 2015-16 Season. For unto us, there is a lurker waiting to be born. And his name shall be ....Artyom "Fowl" Kryukov. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 5 hours ago, Curt said: I believe that the Islanders did in fact still hold his rights. Why don't we trade them a 3rd round draft pick for the right to talk to him? 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Why don't we trade them a 3rd round draft pick for the right to talk to him? Because they don't want to trade him or his rights. 12 hours ago, gilbert11 said: Hello, GM Adams? You there? Did the Islanders still have the rights to Sorokin after 6 years? I read they signed him to an entry level contract for this year, even though he can’t play, so he became a Restricted Free Agent to sign for next season. Dude had Save % .93 and above for the last 3 KHL seasons. With the KHL play being very wide open, that’s really damn good. Would a smart GM work behind the scenes to make a deal for the rights to a Sorokin so they could sign him? Or, the Islanders didn't want to trade him. So a smart GM regardless of how smart he is couldn't do anything. There are lots of legitimate reasons to be annoyed with the Sabres but this isn't one. Another team signing a player they owned the rights too and want, what are we supposed to do? Overpay and screw this team up further? Edited July 15, 2020 by LGR4GM Quote
shrader Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 43 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Because they don't want to trade him or his rights. Or, the Islanders didn't want to trade him. So a smart GM regardless of how smart he is couldn't do anything. There are lots of legitimate reasons to be annoyed with the Sabres but this isn't one. Another team signing a player they owned the rights too and want, what are we supposed to do? Overpay and screw this team up further? The CBA clearly states that draft pick rights are retained for 4 years for any player drafted from a team outside of North America (2 years if drafted at age 20). So if anyone was reporting that they still had his rights, I don't know what rules could make that possible. That said, in cases like this, I think the players have had a good working relationship with the team through years of communication. Minnesota would have had the same thing recently with their signing of Kaprizov, drafted in 2015. I have seen stuff listing these guys as prospects for those teams prior to the signings, I just don't know how that can actually be the case: Quote (d) Players Drafted from a Club Outside North America. (i) Notwithstanding any provision of Sections 8.6(a) or (b) to the contrary, if a Player drafted at age 18 or 19 is drafted from a club outside North America, his drafting Club shall retain the exclusive right of negotiation for his services through and including the fourth June 1 following his selection in the Entry Draft. The Club need not make a Bona Fide Offer to such Player to retain such rights. It's different than with guys like Kryukov, not that it really matters. He was drafted under a previous CBA with a different set of rules. Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 They could have qualified him to retain his rights even if he did not sign and come over, correct? Quote
shrader Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: They could have qualified him to retain his rights even if he did not sign and come over, correct? That isn't done with the european picks. It's the "bona fide offer" mentioned in that section. All I can think is that there is some addition at the end of the document that relates specifically to the KHL and the lack of a transfer agreement. Quote
LGR4GM Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 1 minute ago, shrader said: That isn't done with the european picks. It's the "bona fide offer" mentioned in that section. All I can think is that there is some addition at the end of the document that relates specifically to the KHL and the lack of a transfer agreement. hmm that could be. Everything I read seems to indicate the Islanders were the only option. Quote
Drag0nDan Posted July 15, 2020 Report Posted July 15, 2020 1 hour ago, LGR4GM said: hmm that could be. Everything I read seems to indicate the Islanders were the only option. Why would he come here anyway? 2 Quote
OhMyDahlin Posted July 16, 2020 Report Posted July 16, 2020 (edited) They did something I've never seen before...they signed him to an ELC and immediately gave him a $2M extension. Sorokin, Shesterkin and Merzlikins are about to take the NHL by storm...and we still have Carter Hutton. Lol. Edited July 16, 2020 by OhMyDahlin Quote
\GoBillsInDallas/ Posted July 19, 2020 Report Posted July 19, 2020 On 7/14/2020 at 6:57 PM, gilbert11 said: So, why couldn’t the Sabres sign a Ilya Sorokin? Oops - Wrong Ilya: Quote
French Collection Posted July 19, 2020 Report Posted July 19, 2020 On 7/16/2020 at 9:18 AM, OhMyDahlin said: They did something I've never seen before...they signed him to an ELC and immediately gave him a $2M extension. Sorokin, Shesterkin and Merzlikins are about to take the NHL by storm...and we still have Carter Hutton. Lol. I wonder if the Rangers would move Georgiev? Lundquist still has a few years as a mentor. Quote
Xzy89c Posted July 21, 2020 Report Posted July 21, 2020 On 7/14/2020 at 8:12 PM, gilbert11 said: That’s what I was asking. The Islanders drafted him in 2014. I thought there was like a 3 year window to sign drafted players. the research is fairly easy. You tried to make Adams look foolish, but instead it looks good on you. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.