That Aud Smell Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 Another?! What was the first one? Plenty, apparently. Quote
Tondas Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 If true, just what we need, more dysfunction. Quote
nfreeman Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 Interesting. Has anyone formulated an opinion about Chad D., especially whether he has good inside info? I've read some of his stuff but not enough to come to any conclusions. 1 Quote
tom webster Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 14 minutes ago, nfreeman said: Interesting. Has anyone formulated an opinion about Chad D., especially whether he has good inside info? I've read some of his stuff but not enough to come to any conclusions. I know he has the respect of people who are connected so I wouldn’t doubt his info. 2 Quote
Pimlach Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) I could hardly follow those tweets. Nothing substantial in there. Edited April 29, 2020 by Pimlach Quote
Popular Post dudacek Posted April 29, 2020 Popular Post Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) Oh this is fun! Top 10 reasons for Krueger/Botterill disconnect: The right way to employ right-handed defencemen Jason got a new pocket square but all the girls In the office would talk about was Ralph’s tie. Someone snickered when Jason said “tell me again why Turris isn’t the answer?” Two words: Michael Frolik Ralph got a tour of the super yacht. Jason got to see a picture. How many left wingers is too many left wingers? Ralph’s take on the Neo-Malthusian economic theory as applied to second-line centres. Mrs. Botterill serves Belgian chocolate, not Swiss. That time when Ralph “forgot” he was supposed to meet Jason at the press box buffet and Jason spent 26 minutes listening to Paul Hamilton reminisce about the time he scored two goals (and it really should have been three) against Huntsville-Alabama in the back-end of a November (or was it December?) double-header in ‘82, when... Kim Pegula Edited April 29, 2020 by dudacek 1 5 4 2 Quote
SwampD Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) So, am I missing something? A guy, an internet guy can just say he has confirmed something, and then not say what that something is? Did I miss it somewhere? Edited April 29, 2020 by SwampD 1 Quote
Indabuff Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 42 minutes ago, dudacek said: Oh this is fun! Top 10 reasons for Krueger/Botterill disconnect: The right way to employ right-handed defencemen Jason got a new pocket square but all the girls In the office would talk about was Ralph’s tie. Someone snickered when Jason said “tell me again why Turris isn’t the answer?” Two words: Michael Frolik Ralph got a tour of the super yacht. Jason got to see a picture. How many left wingers is too many left wingers? Ralph’s take on the Neo-Malthusian economic theory as applied to second-line centres. Mrs. Botterill serves Belgian chocolate, not Swiss. That time when Ralph “forgot” he was supposed to meet Jason at the press box buffet and Jason spent 26 minutes listening to Paul Hamilton reminisce about the time he scored two goals (and it really should have three) against Huntsville-Alabama in the back-end of a November (or was it December?) double-header in ‘82, when... Kim Pegula I logged in at work just to say this is awesome since a trophy alone wasn't enough. 2 Quote
DarthEbriate Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 A communications disruption can mean only one thing... 1 1 Quote
Marvin Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) Cap overages Michael Frolik Wayne Simmonds No #2 centre No #3 centre Too many LWs Too many RDs Exactly why should there not have been multiple disconnects between Botterill and Krueger? Edited April 29, 2020 by E4 ... Ke2 Quote
shrader Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 That’s some really odd reporting. This is another in a long line of miscues... I haven’t actually reported on any of them yet, they’re there. Maybe he’s right, but it’s really odd to read it that way. Quote
nfreeman Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 Just for poops and giggles—if there were a serious disagreement that became a power struggle, who would TP be inclined to back? If it’s game of thrones rules, I think Krueger would win. But it’s also fairly likely that they both would get canned or that they each would be told they can resign if they want but otherwise they need to work it out. But this increases the likelihood that next year we have RK and no JB. Quote
Lanny Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 This is him doing analysis of player deployment and roster building. Maybe poor choice of words on his part, but it’s not “confirmed from a source” type of thing. 2 Quote
ubkev Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 JB favors Keynesian economic philosophy whereas RK leans hard towards Friedman. 1 1 1 Quote
SwampD Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Zamboni said: Whatever Chad.... This. By a lot. Im going to start a Twitter feed. “I just heard a thing! It’s big! I mean it!” What garbage. Edited April 29, 2020 by SwampD 1 Quote
Curt Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 9 hours ago, Pimlach said: I could hardly follow those tweets. Nothing substantial in there. 7 hours ago, shrader said: That’s some really odd reporting. This is another in a long line of miscues... I haven’t actually reported on any of them yet, they’re there. Maybe he’s right, but it’s really odd to read it that way. 6 hours ago, Zamboni said: Whatever Chad.... 6 hours ago, Lanny said: This is him doing analysis of player deployment and roster building. Maybe poor choice of words on his part, but it’s not “confirmed from a source” type of thing. 4 hours ago, SwampD said: This. By a lot. Im going to start a Twitter feed. “I just heard a thing! It’s big! I mean it!” What garbage. DUDES. He said “more on this tomorrow”. He is writer. He is teasing his story so that people will go read it. Maybe we will find out today. Then you can decide whether it’s trash or not. Quote
Huckleberry Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 9 hours ago, dudacek said: Oh this is fun! Top 10 reasons for Krueger/Botterill disconnect: The right way to employ right-handed defencemen Jason got a new pocket square but all the girls In the office would talk about was Ralph’s tie. Someone snickered when Jason said “tell me again why Turris isn’t the answer?” Two words: Michael Frolik Ralph got a tour of the super yacht. Jason got to see a picture. How many left wingers is too many left wingers? Ralph’s take on the Neo-Malthusian economic theory as applied to second-line centres. Mrs. Botterill serves Belgian chocolate, not Swiss. That time when Ralph “forgot” he was supposed to meet Jason at the press box buffet and Jason spent 26 minutes listening to Paul Hamilton reminisce about the time he scored two goals (and it really should have been three) against Huntsville-Alabama in the back-end of a November (or was it December?) double-header in ‘82, when... Kim Pegula And rightfully so, ours is way better ? 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted April 29, 2020 Author Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Curt said: DUDES. He said “more on this tomorrow”. He is writer. He is teasing his story so that people will go read it. Maybe we will find out today. Then you can decide whether it’s trash or not. There’ll be no need to wait, for some. I’ve learned that there are some members here who dislike/distrust Chad D. I mostly find him interesting and credible. Edited April 29, 2020 by That Aud Smell 1 Quote
Neo Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 7 hours ago, ubkev said: JB favors Keynesian economic philosophy whereas RK leans hard towards Friedman. That ‘s the final straw .... JB must go. 2 1 Quote
LTS Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 9 hours ago, SwampD said: So, am I missing something? A guy, an internet guy can just say he has confirmed something, and then not say what that something is? Did I miss it somewhere? You know... "bear eats woman, news at 11". It's all about claiming you have something first and then allowing for some time to get it all together to publish. Only in the day of the Internet, someone else could likely scoop him now that he's announced "there's something there!' Quote
Pimlach Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Curt said: DUDES. He said “more on this tomorrow”. He is writer. He is teasing his story so that people will go read it. Maybe we will find out today. Then you can decide whether it’s trash or not. Dude. This guy is far from what I call a “writer”. Modern day journalist maybe. Using gifs of Joey to get you to read his ambiguous tweet is not “writing”. Whether he has a story or not we shall see. Whether his story is credible, who knows? Edited April 29, 2020 by Pimlach Quote
SwampD Posted April 29, 2020 Report Posted April 29, 2020 1 hour ago, Curt said: DUDES. He said “more on this tomorrow”. He is writer. He is teasing his story so that people will go read it. Maybe we will find out today. Then you can decide whether it’s trash or not. Can you update Tweets? I don remember seeing “more on it tomorrow” last night. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.