LGR4GM Posted April 24, 2020 Author Report Posted April 24, 2020 41 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: Has our new friend posted on any other topic besides this one? (Yeah, I could look it up.) Yes in a thread about Robin Lehner and COVID. Also they started a thread about small market teams.
Broken Ankles Posted April 24, 2020 Report Posted April 24, 2020 51 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Yes in a thread about Robin Lehner and COVID. Also they started a thread about small market teams. Good call. Searched under"this forum" using search terms and limited results. When you go under author and content it reveals much more. What do you use? There is also an exchange under stimulus that was entertaining.....Inkman I believe was involved.
Neo Posted April 24, 2020 Report Posted April 24, 2020 6 hours ago, LGR4GM said: What does this mean? I was indulging darker instincts and being snarky. Candid self assessment. 1
LGR4GM Posted April 25, 2020 Author Report Posted April 25, 2020 6 hours ago, Neo said: I was indulging darker instincts and being snarky. Candid self assessment. And I'm asking what you meant by that.
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 11 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: And I'm asking what you meant by that. Yeah, it was a moment ... it’s passed.
Ogre Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 13 hours ago, LGR4GM said: What does this mean? Only some people that post political idealism have their posts deleted(without warning or even a notice). I shared my feelings about Union workers and my post got sent to the beyond. That’s why I started the Resiliency thread “over there”. I’ve busted my ass for years. I deserve a voice too. Censored, I was. I’m just a dumb ***** Ironworker though. I shouldn’t be able to see the bias.
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 Oh, for heaven’s sake ... the premise of the whole thread is class and status, competency and leadership.
SwampD Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 7 hours ago, Neo said: I was indulging darker instincts and being snarky. Candid self assessment. You need to stop it.
LGR4GM Posted April 25, 2020 Author Report Posted April 25, 2020 13 minutes ago, Neo said: Yeah, it was a moment ... it’s passed. So you won't explain making that comment the same day McConnell said what he did and Cuomo responded. Interesting.
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 1 minute ago, SwampD said: You need to stop it. Is it a cease fire, or am I surrendering unilaterally? I want to see a list of signatories... 1 minute ago, LGR4GM said: So you won't explain making that comment the same day McConnell said what he did and Cuomo responded. Interesting. Well, I’m glad to be thought provoking. 2
LGR4GM Posted April 25, 2020 Author Report Posted April 25, 2020 Just now, Neo said: Is it a cease fire, or am I surrendering unilaterally? I want to see a list of signatories... Well, I’m glad to be thought provoking. You're not. I just was curious what you meant. We can move on.
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 I’m glad to make you curious and to have my thoughts described as interesting, even when I am not ...
LGR4GM Posted April 25, 2020 Author Report Posted April 25, 2020 4 minutes ago, Neo said: I’m glad to make you curious and to have my thoughts described as interesting, even when I am not ... You're mistaken. I found your unwillingness to answer a simple question interesting, not the original thought itself. If you had answered that might have changed.
SwampD Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 2 minutes ago, Neo said: I’m glad to make you curious and to have my thoughts described as interesting, even when I am not ... What did it mean? I’m confused as well. if I had to guess, it was pointing the hypocrisy of shade being thrown on the rich, except when the rich are on a certain “side”. No? 1
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 (edited) 12 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: You're mistaken. I found your unwillingness to answer a simple question interesting, not the original thought itself. If you had answered that might have changed. Well, then, I am glad you find my choices interesting, even while I remain uninteresting. I’m doing my best here! Just let me be glad, man! 10 minutes ago, SwampD said: What did it mean? I’m confused as well. if I had to guess, it was pointing the hypocrisy of shade being thrown on the rich, except when the rich are on a certain “side”. No? Leave Mrs. Swamp, and be mine, forever! Edited April 25, 2020 by Neo 1
Zamboni Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 28 minutes ago, SwampD said: What did it mean? I’m confused as well. if I had to guess, it was pointing the hypocrisy of shade being thrown on the rich, except when the rich are on a certain “side”. No? That hypocrisy is very evident, not only with anti-rich comments, but other one sided “analysis” and comments I see littered through most threads that aren’t strictly sports related. It’s just sooo not worth pointing all of them out. I feel, Almost everyone is dug deep in their version of reality and logic. I think, There really isn’t a thing called “debate” anymore on message boards. Now what exists is “this is what I think, and it’s the truth” while at the same time passive aggressively implying “and so what you think, isn’t the truth”. Or “just shut up”, you’re wrong”. No true debate anymore. Message boards are definitely not the only place this phenomenon exists. Just my O. That’s why I’ve stayed mostly silent and just observed. 1
Neo Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 (edited) 6 hours ago, Zamboni said: That hypocrisy is very evident, not only with anti-rich comments, but other one sided “analysis” and comments I see littered through most threads that aren’t strictly sports related. It’s just sooo not worth pointing all of them out. I feel, Almost everyone is dug deep in their version of reality and logic. I think, There really isn’t a thing called “debate” anymore on message boards. Now what exists is “this is what I think, and it’s the truth” while at the same time passive aggressively implying “and so what you think, isn’t the truth”. Or “just shut up”, you’re wrong”. No true debate anymore. Message boards are definitely not the only place this phenomenon exists. Just my O. That’s why I’ve stayed mostly silent and just observed. How dare you put analysis in quotes?! Edited April 25, 2020 by Neo
LGR4GM Posted April 25, 2020 Author Report Posted April 25, 2020 10 hours ago, Neo said: Well, then, I am glad you find my choices interesting, even while I remain uninteresting. I’m doing my best here! Just let me be glad, man! Leave Mrs. Swamp, and be mine, forever! You're not doing your best. You refused to answer or explain. No reason for me to consider it further.
Weave Posted April 25, 2020 Report Posted April 25, 2020 2 hours ago, LGR4GM said: You're not doing your best. You refused to answer or explain. No reason for me to consider it further. Pretty sure that was his intent 6 posts ago. 1
tom webster Posted April 26, 2020 Report Posted April 26, 2020 Interesting article in USA Today. Some of these owners promises where just empty. These things are never as simple as they seem.
Pimlach Posted April 28, 2020 Report Posted April 28, 2020 This thread is funny. Quarantine has odd side effects. 1
LGR4GM Posted April 28, 2020 Author Report Posted April 28, 2020 Saw the Pegulas paid out the canceled Bandits games.
Eleven Posted April 28, 2020 Report Posted April 28, 2020 16 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Saw the Pegulas paid out the canceled Bandits games. They also paid all gameday staff across all teams. I really wish I hadn't been buried last week and could have participated in this thread in a more timely fashion.
nfreeman Posted April 28, 2020 Report Posted April 28, 2020 1 hour ago, Eleven said: They also paid all gameday staff across all teams. I really wish I hadn't been buried last week and could have participated in this thread in a more timely fashion. So it was all a fear-and-loathing tempest in a teapot? This tends to support the "the Pegulas are decent people but holy mackerel they have bad PR instincts and execution" theory. @PASabreFan -- any thoughts? 1
Stoner Posted April 28, 2020 Report Posted April 28, 2020 4 minutes ago, nfreeman said: So it was all a fear-and-loathing tempest in a teapot? This tends to support the "the Pegulas are decent people but holy mackerel they have bad PR instincts and execution" theory. @PASabreFan -- any thoughts? I was going to offer some, but you ruined it for everyone.
Recommended Posts