Randall Flagg Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 2 hours ago, dudacek said: Absolutely. I would not give up #8 on its own for that package. IMO Strome is worth about a pick in the 20s (I personally wouldn’t pay it, but it’s a fair price) and Saad In the 50s. I wouldn't give more than a 3rd for either player by themselves 2 Quote
thewookie1 Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 1 hour ago, freester said: Unfortunately I think the team is Toronto with Risto or Montour being traded for Kerfoot and Kapanen. Kerfoot is not really a 2C although he would be on the the Sabres. Toronto needs to shed salary and is desperate for RD. That would be a horrid trade for us seeing as Kerfoot isn't a 2C. Quote
freester Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 4 hours ago, thewookie1 said: That would be a horrid trade for us seeing as Kerfoot isn't a 2C. Most unbiased observers feel that is equal value although I would rather give up Montour than Risto, but I feel Toronto wants Ristos physicality. Quote
thewookie1 Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 1 hour ago, freester said: Most unbiased observers feel that is equal value although I would rather give up Montour than Risto, but I feel Toronto wants Ristos physicality. Even if it was the fairest trade imaginable I’d rather not aid the Leafs to get my hands on an average 3C and Mid-6 winger Quote
Brawndo Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 Rasmus Dahlin in an interview this AM mentioned how he has added 12 pounds during the off-season and is not listed at 205 compared to 193 last year. 5 Quote
freester Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 For those of you thinking that Dylan Strome is the answer at 2C..Alex Nylander got more ice time than Strome did last night in a key playoff game. Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 Just now, Brawndo said: Rasmus Dahlin in an interview this AM mentioned how he has added 12 pounds during the off-season and is not listed at 205 compared to 193 last year. The best thing that may have ever happened was Dahlin was excluded from the playoffs and given 7 months off to workout and prepare for next year. 2 Quote
sabresparaavida Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 11 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Rasmus Dahlin in an interview this AM mentioned how he has added 12 pounds during the off-season and is not listed at 205 compared to 193 last year. I look forward to seeing how that translates into his game, and how it affects his physicality. Quote
Gabrielor Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 13 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: The best thing that may have ever happened was Dahlin was excluded from the playoffs and given 7 months off to workout and prepare for next year. Yeah, they need to unleash him next season... Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Gabrielor said: Yeah, they need to unleash him next season... Agreed and he needs to unleash himself. Quote
Gabrielor Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: Agreed and he needs to unleash himself. I'm not about to compliment Housley, but I think Dahlin had a lot more freedom to operate under him...and Krueger needs to allow that... 3 Quote
dudacek Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 Just now, Gabrielor said: I'm not about to compliment Housley, but I think Dahlin had a lot more freedom to operate under him...and Krueger needs to allow that... Short-term pain for long-term gain. Krueger did it the right way: demand he focus first on the things he needs to improve in order to make him a complete defenceman. We want him to become Lidstrom, not Housley. 2 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 Can I say how strange it is that using Lindstrom and Dahlin in the same sentence here today, actually is not insane? Quote
LabattBlue Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 15 minutes ago, sabresparaavida said: I look forward to seeing how that translates into his game, and how it affects his physicality. Most players don’t change in this regard. Either they play with a physical edge to their game, or they don’t. People hope now that Tage put on some muscle that he will be more physical and nastier...chances are that it is not going to happen. Quote
Curt Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 13 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Most players don’t change in this regard. Either they play with a physical edge to their game, or they don’t. People hope now that Tage put on some muscle that he will be more physical and nastier...chances are that it is not going to happen. Depends on your definition of physicality. Will Dahlin become a hulking, terrifying open ice headhunter? No. But maybe he can get stronger in the corners, in front of the net, and fight through checks better. Quote
JohnC Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 39 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: The best thing that may have ever happened was Dahlin was excluded from the playoffs and given 7 months off to workout and prepare for next year. Not long ago Dahlin was on a video talking about his workout regime and what he was doing to prepare for next season. Even in this short period after the season was cut short it was noticeable that he had gotten bigger. I tried to find it but couldn't retrieve it. But without question he will be a bigger and stronger version of himself. Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 If you watch Dahlin is physical in his own end when retrieving pucks. I think there is a fiestiness to him. That said, I fully agree you can't teach aggression and Tage isn't going to suddenly start being a physical force... Cozens on the other hand will try and run you over. Just now, JohnC said: Not long ago Dahlin was on a video talking about his workout regime and what he was doing to prepare for next season. Even in this short period after the season was cut short it was noticeable that he had gotten bigger. I tried to find it but couldn't retrieve it. But without question he will be a bigger and stronger version of himself. I think missing a 24 team playoff format and going home as a "loser" is good for the Dahlin's of the world. It drives them when they fail. 1 Quote
Gabrielor Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 (edited) 29 minutes ago, dudacek said: Short-term pain for long-term gain. Krueger did it the right way: demand he focus first on the things he needs to improve in order to make him a complete defenceman. We want him to become Lidstrom, not Housley. Yes...in theory. I saw a lot of Dahlin skating the puck up to our blue line last year, and instead of continuing, he'd hesitate, or stop, in the effort of looking for a pass. I want him to skate if that's the only option, and coverage to adjust. That isn't universal for the other dmen, but I want Dahlin to have that freedom, for sure. Edited August 6, 2020 by Gabrielor Quote
JohnC Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: If you watch Dahlin is physical in his own end when retrieving pucks. I think there is a fiestiness to him. That said, I fully agree you can't teach aggression and Tage isn't going to suddenly start being a physical force... Cozens on the other hand will try and run you over. I think missing a 24 team playoff format and going home as a "loser" is good for the Dahlin's of the world. It drives them when they fail. What is sometimes lost after watching Dahlin make some dazzling plays is his fierceness. (As you point out.) When he is roughed up he doesn't shrink from the combat. He engages with the source of the obstruction. He has the same ferocious competitiveness that Jack has but it isn't as apparent on ice because he is such a smooth and stylish player. Both Jack and Dahlin are not only our two best players but also our most competitive players although with different personalities. They both find losing unacceptable and painful. My fear is that if this less than tolerable success rate continues it will affect how both of these elite players view the franchise. This offseason it is imperative that the front office be bold and creative to upgrade the roster and make this a more contending team. Especially with Jack you can see the frustration building. The future is now! I don't see Tage as ever being a physical force. That's not his game and makeup. Although he can be with more physical development more physical on the ice his game is more finesse revolving around his skating and shooting. I also see this as a critical offseason for Mitts. He needs to work on his body! 1 Quote
dudacek Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 42 minutes ago, LabattBlue said: Most players don’t change in this regard. Either they play with a physical edge to their game, or they don’t. People hope now that Tage put on some muscle that he will be more physical and nastier...chances are that it is not going to happen. It's not about being nasty, it's about winning battles — getting and protecting the puck. Tage and Rasmus needed to improve in that area and I suspect they have. 1 Quote
Radar Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 28 minutes ago, dudacek said: It's not about being nasty, it's about winning battles — getting and protecting the puck. Tage and Rasmus needed to improve in that area and I suspect they have. Many fans don't say it but they want old school nastiness and fight they just don't say it. Winnie g battles and puck possession is not in the back of their minds. Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 I want compete. Where you are always moving and always backchecking and forechecking. Puck hound is what I want and that involves some nastiness. Quote
LabattBlue Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 56 minutes ago, Radar said: Many fans don't say it but they want old school nastiness and fight they just don't say it. Winnie g battles and puck possession is not in the back of their minds. It's both. If you don't think having "old school nastiness" in some of your players is a benefit, then we will agree to disagree. 1 Quote
Thorner Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 On 8/5/2020 at 9:42 AM, WildCard said: If Cozens isn't moved, he's 100% your 3C next season I think he could see time on the wing to ease in. Not necessarily but I wouldn't put his odds of starting at C at 100%. Quote
Thorner Posted August 6, 2020 Report Posted August 6, 2020 19 hours ago, sabresparaavida said: A handful of random things I picked up from talking with my source: Kevyn Adams is very analytically based, looks at the numbers more than Tim Murray's eye test. There is a reasonable chance of Girgs and/or Larsson being back KA is more focused on building a team that works together we'll than Jbotts was. Jbotts was focused more on bringing in the best pieces he could, instead of trying to fit pieces together. (Sited having a surplus of D, but no D chemistry) KA comes across as smarter than Jbotts There is a decent chance we see Skinner with Jack this year. Not 100% going to happen, but there is a good chance it will. Botterill's idea of the best pieces he could bring in is pretty funny. I see the point re: the D, but we didn't do very much talent addition straight up in the forward ranks, either. My concern would still be the addition of top 6 talent before looking primarily at fit, but perhaps KA is incorporating both. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.