nfreeman Posted March 13, 2020 Report Share Posted March 13, 2020 So...if the season is over, the Sabres will have put up 68 pts in 69 games, which projects to 80.8 pts over 82 games. That's an improvement of either 2 or 3 pts over GMTM's final season. Not good enough IMHO to bring back JB, but I wouldn't be stunned if TP decides to keep him on. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted March 13, 2020 Report Share Posted March 13, 2020 3 minutes ago, nfreeman said: So...if the season is over, the Sabres will have put up 68 pts in 69 games, which projects to 80.8 pts over 82 games. That's an improvement of either 2 or 3 pts over GMTM's final season. Not good enough IMHO to bring back JB, but I wouldn't be stunned if TP decides to keep him on. I've seen enough. Move on. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted March 13, 2020 Report Share Posted March 13, 2020 59 minutes ago, nfreeman said: So...if the season is over, the Sabres will have put up 68 pts in 69 games, which projects to 80.8 pts over 82 games. That's an improvement of either 2 or 3 pts over GMTM's final season. Not good enough IMHO to bring back JB, but I wouldn't be stunned if TP decides to keep him on. And that's only because the postponement allows them to skip out on their annual March swoon. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kruppstahl Posted March 13, 2020 Report Share Posted March 13, 2020 1 hour ago, nfreeman said: So...if the season is over, the Sabres will have put up 68 pts in 69 games, which projects to 80.8 pts over 82 games. That's an improvement of either 2 or 3 pts over GMTM's final season. Not good enough IMHO to bring back JB, but I wouldn't be stunned if TP decides to keep him on. I agree that the math doesn't favor a retention of Botterill. But this thing is a lot worse than math! The man is pretty much clueless and easily a bottom 3 to 5 GM in the league (and that's being fair). If the intent is to always improve and get better, Pegula has to get a new GM. I agree he may well NOT do that. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marvin Posted March 14, 2020 Report Share Posted March 14, 2020 14 hours ago, Kruppstahl said: I agree that the math doesn't favor a retention of Botterill. But this thing is a lot worse than math! The man is pretty much clueless and easily a bottom 3 to 5 GM in the league (and that's being fair). If the intent is to always improve and get better, Pegula has to get a new GM. I agree he may well NOT do that. IMHO, "Fair" is far too generous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted March 15, 2020 Report Share Posted March 15, 2020 On 3/13/2020 at 11:17 AM, shrader said: And that's only because the postponement allows them to skip out on their annual March swoon. Really expected them to go 8-6 down the stretch with an outside possibility of 10-4. Getting Ullmark back would've made them competitive nearly every night he'd start. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.