Hoss Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 I’d be all over Stastny if he’s cheap and a salary dump. Quote
dudacek Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 Speculation in Vancouver is that if the Canucks move up its to get Byrum. Quote
Derrico Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 minute ago, jsb said: I'll take Horvat for the #7. That is an interesting proposal but yes I might make that trade. Quote
WildCard Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, dudacek said: Speculation in Vancouver is that if the Canucks move up its to get Byrum. I'd be pretty surprised if he's at #6 still. They either know something we don't, or they're going to package #6 once they get up there. Or this is all a smokescreen. Still, it's fun 3 minutes ago, jsb said: I'll take Horvat for the #7. 1 minute ago, Derrico said: That is an interesting proposal but yes I might make that trade. I wish but Horvat isn't going anywhere Quote
Hoss Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 Every single time someone mentions Vancouver in trades someone brings up Horvat and every single time it needs to be clarified: they’re not trading him. I don’t know where the idea that they will trade him came from. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 hour ago, Brawndo said: Stastny's not ideal & I'd hope that Botterill can do better, but he could work in a pinch. How about seeing how badly they need the cap space by offering CJ Smith? Though I'd rather have a guy that could fit in as the 3C for 2-3 years after Mittelstadt moves up to 2C, that's not nearly as critical as 2C is for the next 2 years. After that, one of Asplund, Davidsson, this years #7 overall, or somebody else can take Mitts role as 3C should this year's 2C not be up to that future role. 1 Quote
Radar Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 34 minutes ago, Derrico said: That is an interesting proposal but yes I might make that trade. I would. They won't. Quote
Tondas Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 2 minutes ago, Radar said: I would. They won't. I'd throw in Nylander and BOGO. So #7, Nylander and BOGO for Horvat. Quote
Radar Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Tondas said: I'd throw in Nylander and BOGO. So #7, Nylander and BOGO for Horvat. That's better, but no. Quote
Tondas Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 It's really #7 for Horvat. BOGO will start the season on IR and probably won't be re-signed next year. Nylander has value due to his draft position and "potential". If he falls flat in Roch/Buf this year, his value will be nothing. I think it's worth the risk. Quote
Tondas Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Let's Go B-Lo said: They aren't trading Horvat for that. For the reasons you just explained. Sorry, I was responding to @Radar and forgot to quote him. Quote
dudacek Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 Horvat is Vancouver’s equivalent of Reinhart, except all Canuck fans see his value. The franchise has no interest in trading him for any sort of package. Quote
Curt Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 4 minutes ago, Tondas said: It's really #7 for Horvat. BOGO will start the season on IR and probably won't be re-signed next year. Nylander has value due to his draft position and "potential". If he falls flat in Roch/Buf this year, his value will be nothing. I think it's worth the risk. I think maybe Radar was saying it would still be a No from Vancouver. Does everyone realize that Bo Horvat is a 24 year old, low end #1/high end #2 C? He is basically ROR. He has gotten better and better each year in the league. I can’t think of a reason that Vancouver would want to trade him. Quote
Tondas Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Curtisp5286 said: I think maybe Radar was saying it would still be a No from Vancouver. Does everyone realize that Bo Horvat is a 24 year old, low end #1/high end #2 C? He is basically ROR. He has gotten better and better each year in the league. I can’t think of a reason that Vancouver would want to trade him. Ahhh, my bad. I was thinking Radar was saying the Sabres would say no. Thanks. 1 Quote
Taro T Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 7 minutes ago, Curtisp5286 said: I think maybe Radar was saying it would still be a No from Vancouver. Does everyone realize that Bo Horvat is a 24 year old, low end #1/high end #2 C? He is basically ROR. He has gotten better and better each year in the league. [ b] I can’t think of a reason that Vancouver would want to trade him.[/b] Would an (the?) answer be that the GM had a minor stroke? (Provided of course he actually winds up on the market.) Quote
inkman Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 40 minutes ago, Curtisp5286 said: I think maybe Radar was saying it would still be a No from Vancouver. Does everyone realize that Bo Horvat is a 24 year old, low end #1/high end #2 C? He is basically ROR. He has gotten better and better each year in the league. I can’t think of a reason that Vancouver would want to trade him. Well 3 GMs traded ROR, so anything is possible I suppose. Quote
Brawndo Posted June 19, 2019 Author Report Posted June 19, 2019 (edited) What are you moving from 7 to 10 for? Edited June 19, 2019 by Brawndo Quote
erickompositör72 Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, inkman said: Well 3 GMs traded ROR, so anything is possible I suppose. 3 GM's? I just counted 2... On another note, I didn't realize ROR got an offer sheet from Calgary after the lockout... Quote
Derrico Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, Brawndo said: What are you moving from 7 to 10 for? Not sure on that but I could see it being because Sabres thought Caufield would slide to 10 and they could still take him there *ducks* Quote
Scottysabres Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 1 minute ago, Derrico said: Not sure on that but I could see it being because Sabres thought Caufield would slide to 10 and they could still take him there *ducks* What would be the add from Vancouver? Quote
Curt Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 12 minutes ago, inkman said: Well 3 GMs traded ROR, so anything is possible I suppose. 2 did. But, once for sure he demanded a trade, and the 2nd time....... Anyway, Horvat is exactly what Vancouver needs. They like him, he likes them, he is signed long term. He isn’t getting traded to Buffalo. Quote
inkman Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, Curtisp5286 said: 2 did. But, once for sure he demanded a trade, and the 2nd time....... Anyway, Horvat is exactly what Vancouver needs. They like him, he likes them, he is signed long term. He isn’t getting traded to Buffalo. Yeah I'd trade anyone this side of Dahlin, even though I'm not his biggest fan, for Horvat. That includes Jack. Bo may not have the skill Jack does but I like his game profoundly more than our saviour's. 1 Quote
Derrico Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 8 minutes ago, Scottysabres said: What would be the add from Vancouver? I would love a second but it would probably be something like a B prospect or 3rd and 5th round pick or something. I wouldn't make that trade but if they really like Caufield or someone similar at 7 and reasonably confident in getting them at 10 then they sure might. 1 Quote
Hoss Posted June 19, 2019 Report Posted June 19, 2019 2 hours ago, Taro T said: Stastny's not ideal & I'd hope that Botterill can do better, but he could work in a pinch. How about seeing how badly they need the cap space by offering CJ Smith? Though I'd rather have a guy that could fit in as the 3C for 2-3 years after Mittelstadt moves up to 2C, that's not nearly as critical as 2C is for the next 2 years. After that, one of Asplund, Davidsson, this years #7 overall, or somebody else can take Mitts role as 3C should this year's 2C not be up to that future role. I think Stastny is going to be one of the very best options made available this offseason that can fill a 2C role. That contract is favorable and he had a very good year once he got healthy. If you can buy low and fill that 2C spot then it really opens up some options moving forward. 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.