Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
17 minutes ago, steveoath said:

So are we in Lose For Lafreniere or Bad of Byfield mode? 

I don’t think tanking is on their radar. A high pick is probably viewed as an added benefit but not the goal. 

I think they went into this season viewing it as some sort of “Culture Year™️“. As if that could be instilled by reinforcing positive messaging rather than by achieving a winning formula. 

Edited by Thorny
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Ross Rhea said:

Damn, get it done JBots.

Cost would hurt.  Cozens, Borgen and a 1st?  (Just spit balling a package that every fan would cringe at)

Maybe have to add pieces (BOGO or something like that for $$$ purposes)

Edited by inkman
Posted

Certainly there is no way the Sabres should do this unless an extension is part of the deal.

But IF Hall would sign an extension, would NJ take Risto, Mitts and an unprotected 2020 #1?

And would JB offer it?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

Certainly there is no way the Sabres should do this unless an extension is part of the deal.

But IF Hall would sign an extension, would NJ take Risto, Mitts and an unprotected 2020 #1?

And would JB offer it?

I would be fine with that assuming there’s an extension 

Posted
44 minutes ago, nfreeman said:

Certainly there is no way the Sabres should do this unless an extension is part of the deal.

But IF Hall would sign an extension, would NJ take Risto, Mitts and an unprotected 2020 #1?

And would JB offer it?

 

27 minutes ago, #freejame said:

I would be fine with that assuming there’s an extension 

If I'm NJ, I laugh and hang up.  Garbage, possible garbage, and a complete unknown.  See my offer.  

Posted

The big concern is the Sabres already have Skinner locked up on a long term deal at LW. Locking up two LWs at their ages to long term expensive deals, doesn’t seem wise at this point. 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
2 hours ago, inkman said:

Cost would hurt.  Cozens, Borgen and a 1st?  (Just spit balling a package that every fan would cringe at)

Maybe have to add pieces (BOGO or something like that for $$$ purposes)

I think that the only way that they get a package like that is if there is an extension already agreed upon.

Posted (edited)
13 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

The big concern is the Sabres already have Skinner locked up on a long term deal at LW. Locking up two LWs at their ages to long term expensive deals, doesn’t seem wise at this point. 

I think Taylor Hall would be an excellent on-ice addition. 

Dont want to give up good assets and a Skinner-sized contract. One or the other maybe, but not both.

Edited by dudacek
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
2 hours ago, inkman said:

Cost would hurt.  Cozens, Borgen and a 1st?  (Just spit balling a package that every fan would cringe at)

Maybe have to add pieces (BOGO or something like that for $$$ purposes)

I disagree in that cost primarily due to the contract situation. They aren’t getting 2 1sts and a D prospect for approximately 20 games of Taylor Hall. 

If he had an extension however that would make sense.

I would guess if Hall has made it clear he wants to be a UFA he’ll be worth a protected 1st or a 2nd and a middish prospect. Cap stuff not withstanding.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Curt said:

I think that the only way that they get a package like that is if there is an extension already agreed upon.

Um...duh?  

58 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

I disagree in that cost primarily due to the contract situation. They aren’t getting 2 1sts and a D prospect for approximately 20 games of Taylor Hall. 

If he had an extension however that would make sense.

I would guess if Hall has made it clear he wants to be a UFA he’ll be worth a protected 1st or a 2nd and a middish prospect. Cap stuff not withstanding.

You don't trade for him unless it's with an extension. As a rental, his price would be negligible.   

Edited by inkman
Posted (edited)
32 minutes ago, inkman said:

Um...duh?  

You don't trade for him unless it's with an extension. As a rental, his price would be negligible.   

I think as a rental he could still get a 1st (probably lottery protected at least) + a B prospect (Borgen, Pekar)

Something like that.  That’s a pretty good return.

Just as a comparison, I would think he would get a little better return that what Kane got.

Edited by Curt
Posted

Colorado is the most logical trading partner. Per Puck Daddy, the Devils have been heavily scouting all levels of the Avs Organization and Colorado has the cap space and prospects to make it happen 

Posted
1 hour ago, Zamboni said:

Would JB do Skinner and Asplund for Hall straight up. Assuming an extension was in place.

Doesn't matter unless Skinner wants to play in Joisey.  He has a full NMC.

Posted

If Botterill trades our 2020 first for anything short of a #1 center under the age of 25 he should be fired before the fax goes through. 

Trade our 2020 first for a 28yr old lw, are we even trying to build a team here?

  • Like (+1) 2
  • Thanks (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...