Radar Posted September 22, 2019 Report Share Posted September 22, 2019 6 minutes ago, dudacek said: You’d get the Vegas Golden Knights. Or at least the version that went to the finals. This really makes for a good discussion. Fans buy tickets to see super stars vs to see winning team. I think definitely they will pay for wins. How to best build a winner? Probably depth not handful of elite players? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 7 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: The biggest issue for me would be once we re-sign Sam and Dahlin, we’d have Skinner, Jack, Reinhart, Point and Dahlin for nearly 50 mill. That leaves only 35 mill for 17-18 other players. And this raises the point I made elsewhere about whether Reino should get a fat long-term deal. It's quite possible that the right number of those contracts on a team is 4 and not 5, and Point would absolutely be preferable to Reino for that 4th one. OTOH, it wouldn't be crazy to bank on the cap continuing to rise and thus creating room for Reino to get that 5th contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 Although I understand why ... In 2018, I wanted JB to take a risk and sign Reinhart to a full 8 years. I think he would have jumped at the chance to sign for 6 mil. per for 8 years. After this season, (unless he absolutely sucks), there’s no way he agrees to under 7.5 mil. Even on a short term deal. His contract last year and this year is a very very good deal. No way the next one will be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjd1001 Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 3 hours ago, dudacek said: You’d get the Vegas Golden Knights. Or at least the version that went to the finals. Possibly yes. When too many teams pay top dollar to superstars and it leaves a lot more 'good' players there for the picking, then the way to build your team will be to get a team full of those 'good' players. Trends take years to develop, but when everyone is doing one thing...the 'other' thing often works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broken Ankles Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 3 hours ago, Radar said: This really makes for a good discussion. Fans buy tickets to see super stars vs to see winning team. I think definitely they will pay for wins. How to best build a winner? Probably depth not handful of elite players? Might not be easy, but I bet a GM could trade one of these high priced/elite players for three or maybe four of these depth players for about the same AAV. The theory being to solidify the middle six. Building depth seems like it’s impervious to failure. ? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted September 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 2 hours ago, nfreeman said: And this raises the point I made elsewhere about whether Reino should get a fat long-term deal. It's quite possible that the right number of those contracts on a team is 4 and not 5, and Point would absolutely be preferable to Reino for that 4th one. OTOH, it wouldn't be crazy to bank on the cap continuing to rise and thus creating room for Reino to get that 5th contract. In this scenario Reinhart probably gets moved to replace some of the assets given up to trade for Point Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SABRES 0311 Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 4 hours ago, French Collection said: The elimination of the middle class. I wonder how good of a team you could assemble with 20 x $4M players. You could possibly get 12 forwards who can score 10-20 goals. Reminds me of Money Ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kas23 Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 38 minutes ago, Broken Ankles said: Might not be easy, but I bet a GM could trade one of these high priced/elite players for three or maybe four of these depth players for about the same AAV. The theory being to solidify the middle six. Building depth seems like it’s impervious to failure. ? Wasn’t this the ROR trade in a nutshell? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curt Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 10 hours ago, kas23 said: Wasn’t this the ROR trade in a nutshell? I think you got the joke. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted September 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) The league needs to investigate if they meet within 2 mil of that number. That would be such ***** garbage. Point was a top 10 player in the entire league last year. I would very, very easily go more than DOUBLE that number on an offer sheet. Edited September 23, 2019 by Randall Flagg 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 6 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said: The league needs to investigate if they meet within 2 mil of that number. That would be such ***** garbage. Point was a top 10 player in the entire league last year. I would very, very easily go more than DOUBLE that number on an offer sheet. The league can't investigate anything, that's all on Point and the NHLPA. If anything it's them that would have an issue with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shrader Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 2 minutes ago, WildCard said: The league can't investigate anything, that's all on Point and the NHLPA. If anything it's them that would have an issue with this Unless they were throwing some money on the side, like say investing in a company he owns (I've heard that one about a certain QB that we all hate). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted September 23, 2019 Author Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 Getting closer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) Edited September 23, 2019 by WildCard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 36 minutes ago, WildCard said: The league can't investigate anything, that's all on Point and the NHLPA. If anything it's them that would have an issue with this Oh for sure, I'd just be unbelievably pissed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freester Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 Rumor: from NHL TRADE RUMORS Laine for Risto, Sheary, and 2 number 1 picks I would not like this unless the picks are lottery protected Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#freejame Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 1 minute ago, freester said: Rumor: from NHL TRADE RUMORS Laine for Risto, Sheary, and 2 number 1 picks I would not like this unless the picks are lottery protected If it comes with a 3x5.5 contract I say yes, so long as this year is lottery protected. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 I wish there was a “vetted accepted sources” rule. No one can post basement twitter dwellers claiming they have sources regarding trades and such. It muddies the waters too much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#freejame Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 Just now, Zamboni said: I wish there was a “vetted accepted sources” rule. No one can post basement twitter dwellers claiming they have sources regarding trades and such. It muddies the waters too much. MLB Trade Rumors is legit. No reason for his sister site not to be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 8 minutes ago, freester said: Rumor: from NHL TRADE RUMORS Laine for Risto, Sheary, and 2 number 1 picks I would not like this unless the picks are lottery protected I heard this one (same source cited, too) from a friend on Saturday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zamboni Posted September 23, 2019 Report Share Posted September 23, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, #freejame said: MLB Trade Rumors is legit. No reason for his sister site not to be I was just saying as a general thought. Sorry if it seemed like I meant it about the NHL Trade Rumors site. I just see several of those “I have a secret source so I’m legit” guys trying to make a name for themselves. Edited September 23, 2019 by Zamboni Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted September 24, 2019 Report Share Posted September 24, 2019 I don't think I buy that source at all. Does that site have a facebook page with the same name? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewookie1 Posted September 24, 2019 Report Share Posted September 24, 2019 I heard the Laine trade rumor from a non-reputable source prior so I'm actually rather torn on this rumor's validity. Regardless I hope its false as I'm very much not fond of Laine and his one dimensional play. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabresparaavida Posted September 24, 2019 Report Share Posted September 24, 2019 While it would add some excitement, I don't think it would be good for the team (Long term for sure). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.