Tondas Posted July 30, 2019 Report Posted July 30, 2019 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Scottysabres said: I'd surmise if they don't make the playoffs, he is gone. Hell, Murray got less time. Pegula's I am sure after 8 years are very short on patience just to make the playoffs. Just a suspicion. You may be right. That's what makes this board fun. I think if the Sabres miss the playoffs, Pegula will rely on the ol' "continuity is a good thing" mantra and give JBOT another year because Pegula will still have no idea how to fix it. I think it's a moot point because I do believe that the Sabres will make progress this year (but probably not the playoffs). That will give Pegula cover to keep JBOT on for another year. Personally, I like JBOT and think he just needs more time. If it was easy, every team would win the Stanley Cup every year.? Edited July 30, 2019 by Tondas Quote
Curt Posted July 30, 2019 Report Posted July 30, 2019 16 minutes ago, Scottysabres said: I'd surmise if they don't make the playoffs, he is gone. Hell, Murray got less time. Pegula's I am sure after 8 years are very short on patience just to make the playoffs. Just a suspicion. Murray got 3 full years, more than Botterill has had so far. Also, I think it was pretty clear that his firing was less a result of the team’s on ice performance and more a result of the general dysfunction of the organization that he had constructed. 1 Quote
Tondas Posted July 30, 2019 Report Posted July 30, 2019 2 minutes ago, Curt said: Murray got 3 full years, more than Botterill has had so far. Also, I think it was pretty clear that his firing was less a result of the team’s on ice performance and more a result of the general dysfunction of the organization that he had constructed. And his especially colorful language, some allegedly directed at Kim. 1 Quote
Popular Post dudacek Posted July 30, 2019 Popular Post Report Posted July 30, 2019 (edited) I don’t think Botterill’s future will be decided so much on whether he makes the playoffs or not, it will more be on how people (most importantly Terry) feel about the future of the direction of the team. Washington and Nashville got 100 points and were disappointments. Calgary got 107 and management is in the hot seat. Colorado got 90 and is considered a powerhouse in waiting. The Rangers and the Devils sucked worse than we did but everyone is bullish on their future. Breakout seasons from key young guys, a buy-in with Krueger, lots of competitive games - just a general feel that we’re trending up. Edited July 31, 2019 by dudacek 13 1 Quote
steveoath Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 14 hours ago, dudacek said: just a general feel that we’re trending up. Optimism!??!!! Are you in the right place? ? Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 What happens if Nashville buys out Turris? I’d sign him the next day for the same contract we gave Johansson. I’d then trade Risto for the best deal possible, whether it’s futures or Ehlers or a combo of players and picks/prospects. Maybe even an upgrade in goal? What would the Sabres look like with Turris signed and Risto traded for Ehlers? Jeff Jack Ehlers Johansson Turris Reinhart Vesey Mitts Olofsson Erod Larsson KO 3 of Sheary, Wilson, Sobotka, Girgensons would need to be traded, bought out or demoted. I’d keep Girgensons. Trade Sheary, Buyout Sobotka and demote Wilson. Quote
Taro T Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 44 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: What happens if Nashville buys out Turris? I’d sign him the next day for the same contract we gave Johansson. I’d then trade Risto for the best deal possible, whether it’s futures or Ehlers or a combo of players and picks/prospects. Maybe even an upgrade in goal? What would the Sabres look like with Turris signed and Risto traded for Ehlers? Jeff Jack Ehlers Johansson Turris Reinhart Vesey Mitts Olofsson Erod Larsson KO 3 of Sheary, Wilson, Sobotka, Girgensons would need to be traded, bought out or demoted. I’d keep Girgensons. Trade Sheary, Buyout Sobotka and demote Wilson. Should Turris be able to be signed for a reasonable deals, would absolutely be interested. But don't want him at his current deal and really not terribly interested in having Nashville keep 1/2 of the salary. In 3 seasons, even the $3MM that would cost would be bringing in poor value. Years 4&5 would be problematic. 1 Quote
dudacek Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 I’d be all over Turris in the above situation. Is there some suggestion a buyout is looming? I wasn’t aware they had another window. Quote
Thorner Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 1 hour ago, dudacek said: I’d be all over Turris in the above situation. Is there some suggestion a buyout is looming? I wasn’t aware they had another window. Don’t think they do, they had no arbitration hearings. Quote
Lanny Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) Sissons and Grimaldi. Sissons signed an extension. Grimaldi is scheduled for August 4 https://www.ontheforecheck.com/2019/7/5/20683640/colton-sissons-rocco-grimaldi-file-for-salary-arbitration-nashville-predators-nhl-free-agency-2019 Edited July 31, 2019 by Lanny Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 26 minutes ago, Thorny said: Don’t think they do, they had no arbitration hearings. They do. Grimaldi’s hearing is slated for Aug 4th. Quote
Thorner Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 35 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: They do. Grimaldi’s hearing is slated for Aug 4th. Right. One of 3 non-Sabres hearings still scheduled. I was placing Turris in Arizona for some reason. Quote
Scottysabres Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Multiple reports the Rangers have bought out Shattenkirk. That's another RHD on the market now. Anyone guess how this affects the market for Risto, if at all? Quote
Tondas Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) I think it has to hurt Risto's value. I think Risto is better than Shattenkirk but now a team will not have to give up an asset to acquire him (only cash and cap). And since Shattenkirk will be getting paid about $1.5 million from the Rangers, whatever team that signs him MAY get him at a discount. Edited July 31, 2019 by Tondas 1 Quote
darksabre Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 I don't think Shattenkirk hurts Risto's value that much. Shatts has an injury history that is going to make teams wary. I can't believe he's only 30. He'll be cheap, but will he be worth it? 1 Quote
Tondas Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 2 minutes ago, darksabre said: I don't think Shattenkirk hurts Risto's value that much. Shatts has an injury history that is going to make teams wary. I can't believe he's only 30. He'll be cheap, but will he be worth it? Can't disagree. I can see his name being thrown into Risto trade negotiations to try to get JBOT to agree to a lesser prospect though. 1 Quote
nfreeman Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 How long until JB signs Shattenkirk? 5 Quote
darksabre Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 Just now, nfreeman said: How long until JB signs Shattenkirk? Allllll of the defensemen lol 3 Quote
dudacek Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 (edited) The reason that Shattenkirk shouldn’t affect Risto is the same reason few of the others have: he’s too soft. Risto puts up 40 points while being a total dick on the ice. Mock them all you want, NHL GMs care about such things Edited July 31, 2019 by dudacek 3 Quote
Tondas Posted July 31, 2019 Report Posted July 31, 2019 14 minutes ago, dudacek said: The reason that Shattenkirk shouldn’t affect Risto is the same reason few of the others have: he’s too soft. Risto puts up 40 points while being a total dick on the ice. Mock them all you want, NHL GMs care about such things Maybe they should add the "dick on the ice" factor to the annual NHL Combine. The WonderDick test. 3 Quote
Broken Ankles Posted August 1, 2019 Report Posted August 1, 2019 1 hour ago, dudacek said: The reason that Shattenkirk shouldn’t affect Risto is the same reason few of the others have: he’s too soft. Risto puts up 40 points while being a total dick on the ice. Mock them all you want, NHL GMs care about such things I guess that means GMs are “people” too. ? Quote
sabills Posted August 1, 2019 Report Posted August 1, 2019 I wouldn't hate Shattenkirk on a cheap/short deal. 2x2 maybe? What side does he play? Quote
Derrico Posted August 1, 2019 Report Posted August 1, 2019 Just now, sabills said: I wouldn't hate Shattenkirk on a cheap/short deal. 2x2 maybe? What side does he play? It doesn’t matter. We buy all the defensemen!!!!!! 1 Quote
Huckleberry Posted August 1, 2019 Report Posted August 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, sabills said: I wouldn't hate Shattenkirk on a cheap/short deal. 2x2 maybe? What side does he play? RW 2 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.