Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
5 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

The receivers

1) Beasley - 5-8, 174 age 31

2) Gabe Davis - 6-2, 210 age 21

3) Diggs - 6-0, 191, age 27

4) Kumerow - 6-4, 209 age 28

5) McKenzie - 5-8, 173, age 25

6) Roberts - 5-11, 195, age 32

7) Hopkins - 6-3, 201, age 22

8.) Brown - 5-11, 178, age 30

If I'm projecting this group next year, I don't think Brown makes the team.  Diggs is the primary, Beasley the slot,  Davis is the size and speed.  McKenzie is the change of pace.  Browns injury history and lack of size works against him going forward.

 

Agree. There is no chance Brown is back unless he takes a massive salary cut. 

Posted
5 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

The receivers

1) Beasley - 5-8, 174 age 31

2) Gabe Davis - 6-2, 210 age 21

3) Diggs - 6-0, 191, age 27

4) Kumerow - 6-4, 209 age 28

5) McKenzie - 5-8, 173, age 25

6) Roberts - 5-11, 195, age 32

7) Hopkins - 6-3, 201, age 22

8.) Brown - 5-11, 178, age 30

If I'm projecting this group next year, I don't think Brown makes the team.  Diggs is the primary, Beasley the slot,  Davis is the size and speed.  McKenzie is the change of pace.  Browns injury history and lack of size works against him going forward.

 

Davis isn't speedy.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 2
Posted
On 12/9/2020 at 4:26 AM, North Buffalo said:

Different kind of players... Brown pure speed, route runner...McKenzie is closer if he can keep developing. Davis big possession receiver with great hands and deceptive speed.  Bills will need another speedster.  I hope they keep both

You can always draft a speedster too.  Kadarius Toney is a name that comes to mind for speed and skill. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

You can always draft a speedster too.  Kadarius Toney is a name that comes to mind for speed and skill. 

Would really rather see them go the FA route rather than the draft to add a burner either in place of or in addition to Brown.

Most rookie receivers are nowhere near as good as Davis has been and honestly can't recall the last burner that didn't take at least 2 years to become useful.

Posted
36 minutes ago, Taro T said:

Would really rather see them go the FA route rather than the draft to add a burner either in place of or in addition to Brown.

Most rookie receivers are nowhere near as good as Davis has been and honestly can't recall the last burner that didn't take at least 2 years to become useful.

Henry Ruggs was real useful for the Jets plan to draft Lawrence.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Seems to me that the days of WR's - burners or otherwise - taking time to become useful in the NFL are gone. I'm not sure whether that's because the NFL has adopted so many elements of the college game, but it seems like, every season, there are several very good rookie WR's - this season that includes Claypool, Jefferson, Davis (which sounds like a pretty good law firm name).

Edited by That Aud Smell
Posted
23 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

Per JW His Extension matches McDermotts in Length 

Can't really see breaking up the set, so that makes sense.

Though should hard times befall the franchise would expect Beane to last longer than McDermott.

Posted
28 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

Per JW His Extension matches McDermotts in Length 

I think what everyone is trying to say is that they now run concurrently. Previously McDermott’s contract ended a year ahead. So BB’s extension would actually be one year less in order to properly align. Of course, I could be wrong.

Posted (edited)

Healthy Steelers inside linebackers for the Bills game Sunday:

Avery Williamson: 81 defensive snaps in 2020 (10.6%)

Marcus Allen (converted safety): 60 defensive snaps (7.9%)

Jayrone Elliott: 1 defensive snap (0.16%) https://t.co/4QDD2qsg3U

— Joe DiBiase (@SneakyJoeWGR) December 10, 2020

Edited by WildCard
Posted
On 12/7/2020 at 5:18 PM, JujuFish said:

Anyone notice the Bulls are actually on the AP top 25?

 

On 12/7/2020 at 7:55 PM, Andrew Amerk said:

This is a football thread. 

 

On 12/7/2020 at 8:51 PM, JujuFish said:

? (I'm assuming this is a joke going over my head)

The Bulls are a basketball team. 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Andrew Amerk said:

 

 

The Bulls are a basketball team. 

The Football Team is Ranked 24th in the Latest AP Poll and Yes that’s the same poll that Clemson, Alabama, Notre Dame are in 

 

Edited by Brawndo
  • Like (+1) 2
  • Awesome! (+1) 1
Posted
17 hours ago, tom webster said:

I think what everyone is trying to say is that they now run concurrently. Previously McDermott’s contract ended a year ahead. So BB’s extension would actually be one year less in order to properly align. Of course, I could be wrong.

Now confirmed by several sources, both contracts run through 2025.

Posted (edited)

I walked away from the Colts-Raiders game for a couple of minutes after the Raiders scored to move within 7.  Came back and the Colts had scored a touchdown, recovered a fumble on the first play after the kickoff, scored a field goal and then had a pick six on the next drive.  Just like that, 17 points!

3 for 3 so far (Patriots loss, Miami loss, Raiders loss)

2 left to clinch playoff spot: Bills win, Ravens loss

 

Edited by carpandean
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...