Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The last time we tried that we had layers of management without clear RAA (responsibility, accountability, authority). 
 

Adding a VP of Hockey to an existing organization could be tricky.  Starting with one, and having that person hire and define the roles below him is a better approach. 
 

If you added Shero he would take some work from JBot and maybe from Kim. 

Edited by Pimlach
Posted
2 minutes ago, Cascade Youth said:

I would do it if only to add pressure to Botterill - sharing an office with your potential replacement tends to increase performance.

yeah, that sounds like a great way to fix this team

Posted

This might sound strange, but I might prefer to do the opposite.

Put Botterill in a role of general overseer, advisor, and CBA/financial guy.  Then hire a proven talent evaluator/team builder as the GM.

Posted
58 minutes ago, Cascade Youth said:

I would do it if only to add pressure to Botterill - sharing an office with your potential replacement tends to increase performance.

In my experience sharing and office with a potential replacement tends to lead to wanting to gtfo.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

This is from a Penguins Blogger regarding Shero, the final three items sound very familiar.

He also believes that Pegula meddles in both teams, so he will have at least one fan on here. 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

This is from a Penguins Blogger regarding Shero, the final three items sound very familiar.

He also believes that Pegula meddles in both teams, so he will have at least one fan on here. 

Ray or the blogger? I need to know who to send the Edible Arrangement to .

  • Haha (+1) 3
Posted
18 minutes ago, LTS said:

Any guy who thought bringing in Subban was a good idea... no.

The guy did worse in the Taylor Hall deal than Botterill did in the O'Reilly deal, too.

Posted
15 minutes ago, Eleven said:

The guy did worse in the Taylor Hall deal than Botterill did in the O'Reilly deal, too.

I'll bite.....how is that possible?  He received  solid prospects, and a first and a third that could become a first if they re-sign Hall...........and no cap dump in return.   All this for a player that is a UFA with no intention of signing there in July. 

That said, not a fan.   Highly questionable picks in 2015 and 2016.   Bogus argument to say their first overalls did not have a franchise type player.   

But he won that trade, and also won the one acquiring Hall in the first place. 

  • Like (+1) 5
Posted
8 hours ago, sweetlou said:

Should Buffalo consider trying to get him for President of Hockey Operations?  Could be a good consultant for JBotts.

If we think this guy is a good GM we should hire him to replace Botteril.  

Posted
25 minutes ago, Formerly Allan in MD said:

He's under plenty pressure as it is.

 

Mmm num ba de Dum bum ba be Doo buh dum ba beh beh

This is our last dance
This is our last dance
This is ourselves under pressure

 

  • Awesome! (+1) 2
Posted
18 hours ago, Eleven said:

The guy did worse in the Taylor Hall deal than Botterill did in the O'Reilly deal, too.

Um, not even close.

I'd take Merkley, Schnarr and Bahl over Thompson, Berglund and Sobotka in a heartbeat.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...