Jävə Keith Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 (edited) May this break the dam of pent up scoring by our Swordsmen. Edited November 8, 2019 by Jävə Keith 1 Quote
Thorner Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 When Reinhart gets a spittin', the goals start clickin 1 Quote
Tondas Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 Pretty obvious call. Refs saw it differently on the ice. They do suck. 1 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 wait - it was waved off on the ice?! Quote
Mustache of God Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 After review that didn't even look that close. These refs are horrible today. Quote
Thorner Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:47 PM, Mustache of God said: After review that didn't even look that close. These refs are horrible today. Expand I actually thought it was pretty close, to my eye. Especially the lowest angle Quote
Torpedo Forecheck Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 Ullmark standing tall. Good thing they got about 4 rebound chances as Larsson stood there reaching Quote
That Aud Smell Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 Some sustained control of play would be ... good. 1 Quote
Torpedo Forecheck Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 Olofsson is another one who is reaching and losing battles. No edge. Too many guys like that Quote
Formerly Allan in MD Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 Winning faceoffs would be quite helpful. TB has won 2/3 of them. Quote
Mustache of God Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:53 PM, Torpedo Forecheck said: Olofsson is another one who is reaching and losing battles. No edge. Too many guys like that Expand Olofsson shouldn't be on the first line. Put Skinner there for a few games. 2 Quote
That Aud Smell Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 it's a bad time for tampa to start looking like tampa again. ullmark has kept the sabres in this one. On 11/8/2019 at 8:54 PM, Mustache of God said: Olofsson shouldn't be on the first line. Put Skinner there for a few games. Expand he's just a specialist at this point. 1 Quote
Torpedo Forecheck Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 outshot 26-14 thru 2. Matches the eye, they've had the puck way more. Quote
Brawndo Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:40 PM, Thorny said: Obviously we can't say for sure till later, but haven't Botterill's drafts looked pretty strong? This season, it seemed from early on the problem with his decision making was that he wasn't making decisions. We offloaded almost no one from last year's team. I still have a nagging feeling the franchise's eyes were set on next season "when the books open up", from the get go. Heck, they even announced next year's unis already. Expand Absolutely and I’m still a huge fan of both Botterill and Krueger and I believe the you’re right about the plan for next year. That being said, they have played enough games this season to demonstrate that 19-55 shouldn’t be a pairing, much less playing the most out of any pairings. The Sobotka Reclamation Project should be over. And the Vesey Trade has been less than expected Quote
Formerly Allan in MD Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:49 PM, That Aud Smell said: Some sustained control of play would be ... good. Expand You're expecting a bit much. TB playing really tough D whenever we cross the line. And f it wasn't for Montour, we'd rarely get out of our own end. Quote
Thorner Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:54 PM, Mustache of God said: Olofsson shouldn't be on the first line. Put Skinner there for a few games. Expand That would be my preference probably as well, but Reinhart should move to line 2, then Skinner - Eichel - Sheary Olofsson - Johansson - Reinhart On 11/8/2019 at 8:57 PM, Brawndo said: Absolutely and I’m still a huge fan of both Botterill and Krueger and I believe the you’re right about the plan for next year. That being said, they have played enough games this season to demonstrate that 19-55 shouldn’t be a pairing, much less playing the most out of any pairings. The Sobotka Reclamation Project should be over. And the Vesey Trade has been less than expected Expand I agree, and the focus being on next year isn't necessarily a good thing, either. Quote
Torpedo Forecheck Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:57 PM, Brawndo said: Absolutely and I’m still a huge fan of both Botterill and Krueger and I believe the you’re right about the plan for next year. That being said, they have played enough games this season to demonstrate that 19-55 shouldn’t be a pairing, much less playing the most out of any pairings. The Sobotka Reclamation Project should be over. And the Vesey Trade has been less than expected Expand Why? Quote
Radar Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:59 PM, Torpedo Forecheck said: Why? Expand Why not? 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted November 8, 2019 Report Posted November 8, 2019 On 11/8/2019 at 8:57 PM, Brawndo said: Absolutely and I’m still a huge fan of both Botterill and Krueger and I believe the you’re right about the plan for next year. That being said, they have played enough games this season to demonstrate that 19-55 shouldn’t be a pairing, much less playing the most out of any pairings. The Sobotka Reclamation Project should be over. And the Vesey Trade has been less than expected Expand I think Sobotka is broken Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.