SwampD Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 36 minutes ago, Eleven said: I don't see what you're seeing, I guess? Just a guy putting slapshots into an open net? Dude. Really? Look at the power he generates from not really that much movement. The stick makes contact in the exact same spot a few inches behind the puck every single time. And listen to the contact. It's almost musical in its perfection. Quote
Eleven Posted March 12, 2020 Author Report Posted March 12, 2020 3 minutes ago, SwampD said: Dude. Really? Look at the power he generates from not really that much movement. The stick makes contact in the exact same spot a few inches behind the puck every single time. And listen to the contact. It's almost musical in its perfection. I'm sorry, man, I'm just not seeing anything amazing there. Well, his son's laughter is pretty amazing. And the dog. 1 Quote
Stoner Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 25 minutes ago, Eleven said: I'm sorry, man, I'm just not seeing anything amazing there. Well, his son's laughter is pretty amazing. And the dog. I'm with you. We must be hockey rubes and hayseeds. I can picture practically every NHL player doing that. Do we really need some driveway video as evidence that Ovechkin is a force of nature? Quote
SwampD Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 52 minutes ago, Eleven said: I'm sorry, man, I'm just not seeing anything amazing there. Well, his son's laughter is pretty amazing. And the dog. 25 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: I'm with you. We must be hockey rubes and hayseeds. I can picture practically every NHL player doing that. Do we really need some driveway video as evidence that Ovechkin is a force of nature? I am disappoint. Quote
shrader Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 53 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: I'm with you. We must be hockey rubes and hayseeds. I can picture practically every NHL player doing that. Do we really need some driveway video as evidence that Ovechkin is a force of nature? For me all I can think of is how pucks and driveways never mixed... too much friction Quote
darksabre Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, shrader said: For me all I can think of is how pucks and driveways never mixed... too much friction It's not even the pucks that don't mix, it's the sticks. Asphalt just tears the hell out of stick blades until there's nothing but a little floppy bit left. Quote
shrader Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 4 minutes ago, darksabre said: It's not even the pucks that don't mix, it's the sticks. Asphalt just tears the hell out of stick blades until there's nothing but a little floppy bit left. Especially with the slap shots. That mixes even better with the previously mentioned driveway in need of repair. 1 Quote
SwampD Posted March 12, 2020 Report Posted March 12, 2020 3 hours ago, shrader said: For me all I can think of is how pucks and driveways never mixed... too much friction Maybe that's his secret. He practices with the friction of the driveway so when he's on the ice his stick speed is that much faster. Brilliant. 2 Quote
SwampD Posted March 13, 2020 Report Posted March 13, 2020 I really need to belabor this point, because I am mesmerized by that video. Here's why. Listen to this slap shot. I know he's probably some turkey, but he has a video. (1:39) There is two distinct hits. The stick on the ice, then the stick on the puck. A T-Kah, if you will. Here's another. Probably another turkey but his shot is a little tighter. (3:20) Two distinct hits. T-Kah. Now listen to Ovi's shot,… and he's on asphalt. Again, Jebus. Quote
Eleven Posted March 13, 2020 Author Report Posted March 13, 2020 6 minutes ago, SwampD said: Now listen to Ovi's shot,… and he's on asphalt. Again, Jebus. Ovechkin's shot sounds very similar to the shot in the second video to me, but I'm not an audio engineer and probably don't have ears like yours. Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted March 14, 2020 Report Posted March 14, 2020 (edited) The Oilers are absolutely smoking the Flyers in this ‘85 Game 5 Stanley Cup final. 6-1 and it’s only the 2nd period. 7-1 now on a goal by Gretzky. Edited March 14, 2020 by Andrew Amerk Quote
SwampD Posted March 14, 2020 Report Posted March 14, 2020 (edited) On 3/12/2020 at 10:51 PM, Eleven said: Ovechkin's shot sounds very similar to the shot in the second video to me, but I'm not an audio engineer and probably don't have ears like yours. That makes sense. People hear two separate events as one until they are about 30 milliseconds apart. I listen for this stuff every day so I'm probably at 20 ms. I did a deep dive and analyzed the waveforms, cuz there is no hockey and I'm really bored. The difference between stick to ice/stick on puck for the first guy was 36ms. The second guy was 26ms. Ovi averaged 6. On asphalt. He's a freak. I continue to be mesmerized by this video. Edited March 14, 2020 by SwampD 1 Quote
Stoner Posted March 14, 2020 Report Posted March 14, 2020 8 hours ago, SwampD said: That makes sense. People hear two separate events as one until they are about 30 milliseconds apart. I listen for this stuff every day so I'm probably at 20 ms. I did a deep dive and analyzed the waveforms, cuz there is no hockey and I'm really bored. The difference between stick to ice/stick on puck for the first guy was 36ms. The second guy was 26ms. Ovi averaged 6. On asphalt. He's a freak. I continue to be mesmerized by this video. Administer five ringers of lactate and two milligramameters of kaopectate STAT! 1 Quote
shrader Posted March 15, 2020 Report Posted March 15, 2020 On 3/14/2020 at 1:16 AM, SwampD said: That makes sense. People hear two separate events as one until they are about 30 milliseconds apart. I listen for this stuff every day so I'm probably at 20 ms. I did a deep dive and analyzed the waveforms, cuz there is no hockey and I'm really bored. The difference between stick to ice/stick on puck for the first guy was 36ms. The second guy was 26ms. Ovi averaged 6. On asphalt. He's a freak. I continue to be mesmerized by this video. So could it just be a difference between asphalt and ice? Quote
SwampD Posted March 15, 2020 Report Posted March 15, 2020 12 minutes ago, shrader said: So could it just be a difference between asphalt and ice? No. I think the other two guys’ times would be even longer if they were on asphalt because of the added friction. Quote
darksabre Posted March 15, 2020 Report Posted March 15, 2020 11 minutes ago, shrader said: So could it just be a difference between asphalt and ice? I would expect the time between contact with the surface and the puck to be longer on asphalt due to friction, so I think that makes what Ovi is doing even more impressive. The best shooters are the ones who can go from loading the stick on the ice surface to making contact with the puck in the shortest time possible. So it doesn't surprise me at all that Ovi would be significantly more efficient at this process. I bet if swamp isolated Ovis shot in this video the results would be very good. Quote
SwampD Posted March 15, 2020 Report Posted March 15, 2020 11 minutes ago, darksabre said: I would expect the time between contact with the surface and the puck to be longer on asphalt due to friction, so I think that makes what Ovi is doing even more impressive. The best shooters are the ones who can go from loading the stick on the ice surface to making contact with the puck in the shortest time possible. So it doesn't surprise me at all that Ovi would be significantly more efficient at this process. I bet if swamp isolated Ovis shot in this video the results would be very good. I tried, but the mic is too far away from him to be able to discern the direct sound from the slap off of the boards. There may be more than one mic open as well. You can see the slap shot making it to the camera four times here (there were actually around 8 or 9 reflections. pretty cool.) If I had to guess, the first and last one in this picture kinda show two hits, which would be about 3 or 4 milliseconds, but I can't be sure. 1 Quote
apuszczalowski Posted March 19, 2020 Report Posted March 19, 2020 On 3/13/2020 at 10:04 PM, Andrew Amerk said: The Oilers are absolutely smoking the Flyers in this ‘85 Game 5 Stanley Cup final. 6-1 and it’s only the 2nd period. 7-1 now on a goal by Gretzky. C'mon man, Spoiler........ Quote
darksabre Posted March 23, 2020 Report Posted March 23, 2020 1 minute ago, spndnchz said: Nbcsn has game 7’s on all night Yessss the epic collapse Bruins Leafs game Quote
MODO Hockey Posted March 24, 2020 Report Posted March 24, 2020 Dno if this has been posted elsewhere, 1 Quote
Ducky Posted March 27, 2020 Report Posted March 27, 2020 Apologies if someone has posted tis already but the Athletic handed out the year end trophies... Hart.........................Drai Norris....................Jossi Selke...............Couturier Vezina..........Hellebuyck Calder...................Makar Jack Adams...Vigneault GM.........................Sakic I can't really argue about any of them to be honest. Helle gets the biggest win margin with 38 out of 41 votes. Quote
Thorner Posted March 27, 2020 Report Posted March 27, 2020 (edited) Lol Draisaitl is not the most valuable player to his team. Which team suffers more, the Oilers if you remove Draisaitl, or the Sabres if you remove Eichel? It's not even close. One team still has McDavid ? If people don't want to hand out the awards based on the actual criteria stated then they should just change the definition of the awards. Make it "most outstanding" or something. - - - Also, the thread that was talking about it was locked - that proposed plan to have team "play" for the opportunity to draft first is ridiculously over-complicated. Give the top pick to the worst team. The hoops they try to jump through to solve a problem that doesn't exist is mind-boggling. Edited March 27, 2020 by Thorny Quote
shrader Posted March 28, 2020 Report Posted March 28, 2020 18 hours ago, Thorny said: Also, the thread that was talking about it was locked - that proposed plan to have team "play" for the opportunity to draft first is ridiculously over-complicated. Give the top pick to the worst team. The hoops they try to jump through to solve a problem that doesn't exist is mind-boggling. The problem they’re trying to solve is not the draft order. It’s an attempt to recover lost revenue. That said, using the draft order as a revenue tool is an absolutely horrible idea. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.