Jump to content

GDT:Buffalo at Columbus. 9/17/19 7pm Streaming at Sabres.com WGR


Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Eleven said:

Is it a requirement that a goalie wear a NASCAR number to play in Columbus?  We've gone from 70 to 80 now.

You haven't heard that from me.  I thought (and still think) that he is their most reasonably tradeable asset, but I definitely think he belongs.

Didn't mean to imply you did say that.  (Apologies if it came across as directed directly at you.)

Posted
9 minutes ago, darksabre said:

Okposo-Sobotka-Pekar is a worthless line.

 

9 minutes ago, triumph_communes said:

Even in preseason Sobotka is awful

Yeah.  Pekar should not be punished simply because his parents lived in the same country that Sobotka's did.

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Casey's line < 30% possession at 5 v 5

- - - 

If Cozens pans out, with his speed, perhaps he'll be the better fit at 2C, and Casey could be best suited to wing in that scenario. Depending if we want one of the 3 at 3C, I guess. 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
6 minutes ago, Thorny said:

Casey's line < 30% possession at 5 v 5

- - - 

If Cozens pans out, with his speed, perhaps he'll be the better fit at 2C, and Casey could be best suited to wing in that scenario. Depending if we want one of the 3 at 3C, I guess. 

I'm ready to try Reinhart there again.  I was ready last year.

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Eleven said:

I'm ready to try Reinhart there again.  I was ready last year.

Sorry, meant long term. 

I've been resistant to Reinhart at 2C this year but maybe they'll have to try it. Doesn't seem to be in Botterill's plans though. 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
Just now, Thorny said:

Sorry, meant long term. 

I've been resistant to Reinhart at 2C this year but maybe they'll have to try it. Doesn't see to be in Botterill's plans though. 

I mean long-term too.  If Mittlestadt and Cozens can't take the 2C opportunity away from Reinhart, why not give it to him?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Eleven said:

I mean long-term too.  If Mittlestadt and Cozens can't take the 2C opportunity away from Reinhart, why not give it to him?

It's a key point. There's no one for Mittelstadt to take that spot away from. Wasn't one his rookie year, isn't one now. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, thewookie1 said:

I think Mitts needs to have some time to grow into his slightly larger size.

 

His D awareness is a bit better though

30 games or so in Rochester would help him.

Posted

I think Mitts needs to develop. Just like it took (and taking) Reinhart years to develop. Just like it took VO. Just like it took (and taking) Ullmark. Just like it took McCabe. I’m not in the least worried about Mitts. He’ll get there.

Posted
14 minutes ago, Eleven said:

I'm ready to try Reinhart there again.  I was ready last year.

If he was a little faster, I'd be fine with trying him at 2C again.  But with so much of his game being making nice passes on the rush and interacting with his linemates there, that really don't want to see him primarily starting rushes 30-50 ft behind them.  It will take away a lot of his value in the neutral zone & breakout.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...