Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

This does not line up with my "Ullmark will be elite" narrative.

If that article had a mouth, it would say "Ullmark who?"

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

This article lacks any real credibility.  It lists Fred Andersen as the 7th best goalie.  Last season he was 13th in Save% at .917 and 25th in GAA at 2.77.

These are mediocre numbers at best.  He should be between 13-18.

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said:

This article lacks any real credibility.  It lists Fred Andersen as the 7th best goalie.  Last season he was 13th in Save% at .917 and 25th in GAA at 2.77.

These are mediocre numbers at best.  He should be between 13-18.

 

 

Yes but the authors live in Toronto and they’ve heard a lot about what the Toronto media says.

Posted
14 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Yes but the authors live in Toronto and they’ve heard a lot about what the Toronto media says.

Wait are you saying there is a Toronto bias in hockey media coverage.  No way.  It must be all those Cups they have won since 1967.

  • Haha (+1) 2
Posted

I don't hate that ranking for Freddy. For a large chunk of last season, he was simply outstanding. I'd probably have him at ~10 rather than 7, but I don't see that (or anything else on that list) as egregious. 

I actually just looked, and Andersen is 10th in GSAA - sorta like GAA but taking into account shot volume/location, and then comparing it to what a league average goalie would do. I believe he was top 5 in that metric until February or March.

Other nitpicks: 
I'd drop Vasi to 4, Price to 5, behind Bishop, Bob, and Gibson. I'd move up Fleury, drop Helle fairly far. Binnington lower, Raanta higher. Quick lower right now, he was miserable last year independent of his team's play.

Posted

I don't have a deep knowledge of all of the goalies in the NHL, but this seems to be a reasonable list with a little bit of evidence/explanation for each ranking.  Any piece like this, unless you copy and paste a statistical chart, is going to based on a lot of opinion and possibly some bias.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...