... Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 I respect that Columbus always seems to take the opportunity to go after the short-handed goal. Quote
bob_sauve28 Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Oh man, Foligno just couldn't lift it Quote
SwampD Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 3 minutes ago, ... said: Bob's awake! Awesome. That was a nice tackle by Chara along the near boards. But I prefer free jazz while watching hockey. Quote
... Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Thankfully they called that. The ref close by couldn't be bothered. Quote
SwampD Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Rules question. They stopped play for an offsides on the BJs, but the face-off was at the dot just outside their blue line. What's the reason? Maybe that's where the pass came from? Quote
Wyldnwoody44 Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Enjoyed that ending very much so, what a story it would be for Columbus to knock off the B's 1 hour ago, SwampD said: Rules question. They stopped play for an offsides on the BJs, but the face-off was at the dot just outside their blue line. What's the reason? Maybe that's where the pass came from? That's gotta be the only reason, kinda like a 2 line pass. Intentional, comes back in, so the pass must have been close to the blue line then offsides in the B's zone Quote
woods-racer Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 11 hours ago, SwampD said: Doc and Milbury make this almost unwatchable. I like Doc. Millbury makes Rob Ray look like a silver-tongued genius. 1 1 Quote
SDS Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Just a pedantic point… It is offside not offsides. There is an onside and an offside, there are no multiple offsides... 1 Quote
Stoner Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 8 minutes ago, SDS said: Just a pedantic point… It is offside not offsides. There is an onside and an offside, there are no multiple offsides... I was just looking up the rule about faceoff location after an offside play. I couldn't understand why I found so few results when searching for "offside." Turns out the NHL appears to favor "off-side." Anywho, regarding the faceoff location question that @SwampD had: 83.6 Face-Off Location - For violation of this rule, the play is stopped and the puck shall be faced-off in the neutral zone at the face-off spot nearest the attacking zone of the offending team when the violation occurs as a result of the attacking team carrying the puck over the attacking blue line, or from the face-off spot in the zone closest to the point of origin of the shot or pass (even if deflected off an attacking or defending player or an official). Quote
SwampD Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 19 minutes ago, SDS said: Just a pedantic point… It is offside not offsides. There is an onside and an offside, there are no multiple offsides... This is hilarious. I actually thought that when I typed it but had just enough vodka in me to not care.? 9 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: I was just looking up the rule about faceoff location after an offside play. I couldn't understand why I found so few results when searching for "offside." Turns out the NHL appears to favor "off-side." Anywho, regarding the faceoff location question that @SwampD had: 83.6 Face-Off Location - For violation of this rule, the play is stopped and the puck shall be faced-off in the neutral zone at the face-off spot nearest the attacking zone of the offending team when the violation occurs as a result of the attacking team carrying the puck over the attacking blue line, or from the face-off spot in the zone closest to the point of origin of the shot or pass (even if deflected off an attacking or defending player or an official). That’s it then. The pass was from inside the Jackets’ zone. Not sure if I ever knew that . Quote
SDS Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 3 hours ago, SwampD said: This is hilarious. I actually thought that when I typed it but had just enough vodka in me to not care.? The term is routinely butchered in the US in both hockey and soccer. Like irregardless, we hear it so much around here from players and others fans it sounds natural. If you watch EPL, they always get it right and usually the better PBP guys in hockey get it right too. Quote
Zamboni Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 I’m hoping NYI and SJS come out with a win today ... Quote
Thorner Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Carolina being bitten by that injury bug, now. They've been on the good side of that in the playoffs before, of course. Quote
Sabel79 Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Am I wrong for wanting both Carolina and the Islanders to lose? Wait who am I kidding... nope, they’re both awful. 2 Quote
skaught Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 (edited) I'm confused, I thought it was perfectly legal to kick the puck in if it bounces off someone else first. Edit: Nevermind, TIL only counts if it hits a stick Edited April 28, 2019 by skaught Quote
Zamboni Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 12 minutes ago, skaught said: I'm confused, I thought it was perfectly legal to kick the puck in if it bounces off someone else first. Quote
Sabel79 Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 Amazing what a bit of distance will do. I now enjoy watching Robin Lehner give up terrible goals. 1 Quote
Thorner Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 9 minutes ago, Sabel79 said: Amazing what a bit of distance will do. I now enjoy watching Robin Lehner give up terrible goals. Can't fault him on goal 2, be interesting to see how he responds. Quote
Pimlach Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 I watched the last ten minutes of Canes win. Is there a luckier goalie than McIlhenny? My God the crossbars, goalposts, and open net misses by the Islanders. I don’t want to see a market like Carolina thrive when most people there are clueless about the game. Quote
Pimlach Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 49 minutes ago, Zamboni said: Right on, especially when he kicked it from behind the goal line. Not a direct attempt to score The NHL has terrible rules, and then they have the latitude to interpret them any way they wish. Carolina’s goalie blew the play and got another break. Quote
Sabel79 Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 42 minutes ago, Thorny said: Can't fault him on goal 2, be interesting to see how he responds. Goal one though... woof. Quote
Stoner Posted April 28, 2019 Report Posted April 28, 2019 7 minutes ago, Pimlach said: Right on, especially when he kicked it from behind the goal line. Not a direct attempt to score The NHL has terrible rules, and then they have the latitude to interpret them any way they wish. Carolina’s goalie blew the play and got another break. Huh? You can't kick the puck into the net off the goalie. Intent is not in play. Anyway, the rule that is highlighted talks about deflections. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.