Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

7th is quite a high pick. Anything after the top 2 is going to come down to personal ranking and preference, Botterill still should be able to, and MUST, select a very good player in that spot. No excuses. 

 

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gatorman0519 said:

At worst I was hoping 6th... 7th might put us just out of range for the elite players.  We won’t get help for next year that’s for sure.  

Only top 2 was getting us help. 7th is fine. There's a cutoff at 8 maybe 9. So we're before that. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Thorny said:

7th is quite a high pick. Anything after the top 2 is going to come down to personal ranking and preference, Botterill still should be able to, and MUST, select a very good player in that spot. No excuses. 

 

 

 

Yea, I really don't care about dropping from 5 to 7. It's irrelevant. I just freaking despise the teams that moved up. 

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...