Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
6 minutes ago, woods-racer said:

No matter what way you slice this loaf we are in need of a 2C.

2c would be less of a problem if Reinhart was always on that line. 

  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
1 minute ago, LGR4GM said:

2c would be less of a problem if Reinhart was always on that line. 

True. I don't disagree with that at all.

I will take Jack, Sam, Middlestadt/E-Rod as our 1-2-3.

But then we need 2 good to really good forwards.

Posted
5 minutes ago, woods-racer said:

No matter what way you slice this loaf we are in need of a 2C.

 

I think we have a great first line. There’s A LOT of parts there to make lines 3-4 really dangerous and deep. Great foundation.,

But I think we’re missing an entire 2nd line..... not just a 2C. But can that be done this offseason?

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

The last part about Sobotka and Scandella was the best part of all this. Otherwise...Okposo promoted to line 2 aside Sheary? Gag me. Let's go ahead and put Sam on the top line to further weaken our depth, too.

Edited by New Guy
Posted
41 minutes ago, CallawaySabres said:

Why does that lineup look worse and worse every practice report I read.....Jesus, this team really needs A LOT of work. We have 4 guys on offense that would make a Stanley Cup roster.

Curious - who is the fourth in your opinion?

Posted
1 hour ago, New Guy said:

The last part about Sobotka and Scandella was the best part of all this. Otherwise...Okposo promoted to line 2 aside Sheary? Gag me. Let's go ahead and put Sam on the top line to further weaken our depth, too.

I don't understand why it took the coach 35 weeks to figure out Scandella and Sobotka suck. (this is where I find out they are injured and the coach still has no clue)

20 minutes ago, CallawaySabres said:

My 4 would be Jack, Skinner, Reino and Mittle when ready but E-rod right now

Mittlestadt isnt even a top 4 Amerk.

38 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

This post should appear in the Fire Housley Thread.

Because it took the coach 6 months to figure out 17 & 2 are bad at the hockey?

Posted
4 minutes ago, inkman said:

I don't understand why it took the coach 35 weeks to figure out Scandella and Sobotka suck. (this is where I find out they are injured and the coach still has no clue)

Mittlestadt isnt even a top 4 Amerk.

Because it took the coach 6 months to figure out 17 & 2 are bad at the hockey?

Yes and because he insists on keeping the Top Line Together, when Reinhart was helping the second line perform much better. 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Huckleberry said:

Samson should be the 2C.

I disagree with that though.  At this point, let him play wing.  Put a decent-ish center on the line such as ERod and Sam will make him better.

Posted
40 minutes ago, inkman said:

I don't understand why it took the coach 35 weeks to figure out Scandella and Sobotka suck. (this is where I find out they are injured and the coach still has no clue)

Vindication 

 

  • Sad 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, New Guy said:

X-37-23 was a good second line back when we won one out of every two games about a week ago...

Agreed. At this point Jack and Sam on separate lines should be a foregone conclusion.

Pommers with Jack & Jeff gives that line ~90% of the effectiveness of Sam with that pair, and Sam on the second line turns them from road kill into an offensive threat.

  • Like (+1) 4
Posted
42 minutes ago, Samson's Flow said:

Agreed. At this point Jack and Sam on separate lines should be a foregone conclusion.

Pommers with Jack & Jeff gives that line ~90% of the effectiveness of Sam with that pair, and Sam on the second line turns them from road kill into an offensive threat.

In my mind, that’s the perfect line for Olofsson next season. He’s got the shot to convert from Eichel’s feeds and this season he’s shown he can feed passes as well. Playing with them would give him the space he needs to create and transition to the NHL game, all while adding to the scoresheet and presumably confidence. 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, Samson's Flow said:

Agreed. At this point Jack and Sam on separate lines should be a foregone conclusion.

Pommers with Jack & Jeff gives that line ~90% of the effectiveness of Sam with that pair, and Sam on the second line turns them from road kill into an offensive threat.

 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...