Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:43 PM, LGR4GM said:

Getting a 6th rounder for a NHL defender just seems mediocre

Expand  

It is.. a mediocre defenseman who can't break the lineup on a team that just traded for more D.  

He wasn't going to get more.  At this point he would just be wasting a contract spot. 

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:44 PM, LTS said:

It is.. a mediocre defenseman who can't break the lineup on a team that just traded for more D.  

He wasn't going to get more.  At this point he would just be wasting a contract spot. 

Expand  

yea, I guess that's true. 

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:44 PM, LTS said:

It is.. a mediocre defenseman who can't break the lineup on a team that just traded for more D.  

He wasn't going to get more.  At this point he would just be wasting a contract spot. 

Expand  

I'd imagine they let it go down to the wire and then took the best they could get.

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:44 PM, LTS said:

It is.. a mediocre defenseman who can't break the lineup on a team that just traded for more D.  

He wasn't going to get more.  At this point he would just be wasting a contract spot. 

Expand  

The leverage point here is a good one. Tough to convince other teams that we don't need to trade Beaulieu when we have 9 NHL defensemen on the roster.

  • SDS pinned this topic
Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:46 PM, Carmel Corn said:

I thought they would do better though....some teams have some banged-up D-men.  Not a rental situation either.

Beaulieu may enjoy this new situation though.

Expand  

Well, The Penguins learned that one of their D should be back soon and then got Gudbrandson.  Truthfully, I think I'd rather have Beaulieu but I would imagine that the Pens wanted Gudbrandson.

 

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:47 PM, sabills said:

Beaulieu gets to be the 7th D on a cup contender instead of a playoff hopeful, so thats a nice bump for him. Of course he has to go to Winnepeg in February, so thats a thing.

Expand  

Maybe not; they just added another defenseman.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:44 PM, LTS said:

It is.. a mediocre defenseman who can't break the lineup on a team that just traded for more D.  

He wasn't going to get more.  At this point he would just be wasting a contract spot. 

Expand  

The thing is, I like Beaulieu and I don't get why he wasn't in the line-up more.  He is the only player whose usage made the complaints about Phil's player usage legit to me.  If Scandella or someone else was worth more, they could have moved them instead.

However, the reality is that Beaulieu dug his own hole after publickly saying he wanted to be traded.  Too bad.

Edited by ...
horrible day for typing it is
  • Like (+1) 2
Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:41 PM, LGR4GM said:

 

I would have rather kept him instead of this

Expand  

But *he* didn't want to be here.  Remember?  He requested a trade.  He got it and now he'll be a depth piece on a playoff team instead of a depth piece on a rebuilding team.

Posted
  On 2/25/2019 at 8:47 PM, Trettioåtta said:

He asked for a trade a while ago

Expand  

No he didn't.  He said he wanted to stay in Buffalo but he wanetd to play more.  He said his first preference was to stay here but if he wasn't going to play then he wanted to go somewhere he could.  

definitely not the same as "asking" to be traded.

  • Like (+1) 1
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...