MattPie Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 Tune in to see the Buffalo Sabres play hockey against the Minnesota Wild. 1 Quote
Doohicksie Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 1 hour ago, MattPie said: Tune in to see the Buffalo Sabres play hockey against the Minnesota Wild. Brilliant start to a GDT. Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 24 minutes ago, Doohickie said: Brilliant start to a GDT. This GDT has more effort than Phil put into the lineup. 4 Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 MUST WIN!! GO SABRES!! +++++++++++++++ Now, Thanks, Matt for getting us going. But ......... The thread is not even tagged and where is the game being played? This above part is an automated ... blah, blah, blah .......... (wink - wink) Quote
SabresBaltimore Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 So last game I said I feel like we need to earn 10/14 points to have a shot at remaining in the Wild Card hunt. That means we're now down to 10/12 points for this homestand. So we have to go either 5-2-0 or 4-0-2. That makes this another MUST Win! Â But considering Phil's approach to lines appears to be by rolling dice (or maybe flipping a coin?), I'm not sure how well we're going to play against a team ahead of us in the standings. Â Here's to hoping for a return to some of that November magic! Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 LW C RW ZACH PARISE Rating: 76.4#26 LW MIKKO KOIVU Rating: 74.2#60 C CHARLIE COYLE Rating: 73.2#60 RW FL1 Rating Rating: 74.64#28 FL1 JASON ZUCKER Rating: 76.5#25 LW ERIC STAAL Rating: 81.3#15 C MIKAEL GRANLUND Rating: 77.2#39 RW FL2 Rating Rating: 78.31#1 FL2 JORDAN GREENWAY Rating: 71.9#84 LW VICTOR RASK Rating: 71.0#145 C MARCUS FOLIGNO Rating: 70.4#106 RW FL3 Rating Rating: 71.10#28 FL3 MATT HENDRICKS Rating: 69.5#126 LW ERIC FEHR Rating: 69.5#111 C J.T. BROWN Rating: 69.3#115 RW FL4 Rating Rating: 69.44#30 FL4  DEFENSIVE PAIRINGS RYAN SUTER Rating: 80.1#5 LD JARED SPURGEON Rating: 79.1#14 RD DL1 Rating Rating: 79.55#2 DL1 JONAS BRODIN Rating: 73.2#50 LD GREG PATERYN Rating: 71.7#75 RD DL2 Rating Rating: 72.46#23 DL2 NICK SEELER Rating: 70.7#102 LD BRAD HUNT Rating: 75.1#31 RD DL3 Rating Rating: 72.88#8 DL3 I’m not adding that garbage Phil had during practice. Anyway. Sabres are still in 9th with Carolina and Philly coming in hot. Minnesota is 7th in the West with a 13-13-0 away record.  Dumba and some guy named Aberg are injured. Dubnyk has a .914 SV% and 2.55 GAA. Stalock is at .892 with 3.00 GAA. We all want Ullmark and Phil will likely put the goalie coach in net. Quote
OverPowerYou Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) We are only 3 points behind Columbus with the same amount of games played, let's get that wildcard ! Edited February 5, 2019 by OverPowerYou 3 Quote
Brawndo Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.  Quote
inkman Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.  Doomed Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.  Someone should tell him performance in the CBJ win was not as good as the performance in the Dallas loss. Quote
Brawndo Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, SABRES 0311 said: Someone should tell him performance in the CBJ win was not as good as the performance in the Dallas loss. Â Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Brawndo said:  Not Ullmark’s fault they couldn’t score. Ullmark has a winning record. Hutton does not. Hutton let in four against Columbus to Ulmark’s one in Dallas. I don’t get Phil’s problem. To get the win Ullmark would’ve had to get his third shutout. How many does Hutton have and compare who has had more opportunities (games played). Edited February 5, 2019 by SABRES 0311 Quote
darksabre Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 24 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.  What a maroon 2 1 Quote
Eleven Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.  This is a pretty close paraphrase of what I heard. It's nearly moronic. (Housley's statement, not your paraphrase.) Edited February 5, 2019 by Eleven 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) 43 minutes ago, Brawndo said: Housley said that the decision on who starts in net is results based on wins and losses. Hutton winning in Columbus and Ullmark losing 1-0 in Dallas was the reason that Hutton started versus Chicago.   27 minutes ago, Brawndo said:   20 minutes ago, SABRES 0311 said: Not Ullmark’s fault they couldn’t score. Ullmark has a winning record. Hutton does not. Hutton let in four against Columbus to Ulmark’s one in Dallas. I don’t get Phil’s problem. To get the win Ullmark would’ve had to get his third shutout. How many does Hutton have and compare who has had more opportunities (games played). Just posted about this in the Housley thread but I am about there with Phil. He just isn't a smart hockey person and doesn't either use or understand the information presented to him. His analyses and conclusions are painfully slow in coming and usually incorrect even if there is an obvious correct answer. At this stage, I am not sure if I want him back next season. I am also concerned that his assistant coaches didn't or couldn't intervene successfully on something like this. Between Phil's love of Scandella and Hutton it is clear he plays and has favorites. I just... Edited February 5, 2019 by LGR4GM Quote
inkman Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 7 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: He watches Fox News though. That makes things more clear 1 Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: He watches Fox News though. Careful. Last time I posted something like that feelings were hurt. ? Quote
darksabre Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 2 minutes ago, inkman said: That makes things more clear Yeah...I'm starting to think that birds of a sh*t feather flock together re: Phil and his wife. 1 Quote
... Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 (edited) 28 minutes ago, PASabreFan said: He watches Fox News though. What does that matter? Would he be smarter for watching CNN or MSNBC? Edited February 5, 2019 by ... grahamer Quote
... Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 11 minutes ago, darksabre said: Yeah...I'm starting to think that birds of a sh*t feather flock together re: Phil and his wife. Awesome. Let the ideological bullying begin. This thread will be dynamic and marvelous with it, and we'll all learn to fall in line with mediated sociopolitical thought. Quote
SABRES 0311 Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 3 minutes ago, ... said: What does that matter? Would he smarter for watching CNN or MSNBC? He would only watch CNN after eating a tub of soy. But seriously Phil sucks at coaching. 2 minutes ago, ... said: Awesome. Let the ideological bullying begin. This thread will be dynamic and marvelous with it, and we'll all learn to fall in line with mediated sociopolitical thought. That’s not part of the NPC talking point. But you are right. Quote
inkman Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 12 minutes ago, ... said: What does that matter? Would he be smarter for watching CNN or MSNBC? My answer would be none of the above 1 Quote
WildCard Posted February 5, 2019 Report Posted February 5, 2019 Winning this one. I'll bet my account on it Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.