Jump to content

Trade Thread -- 2019 Deadline Edition (Actual Trades not Involving Sabres). Also, trade rumors and all other thoughts about anything.


Recommended Posts

  • nfreeman changed the title to Trade Thread -- 2019 Deadline Edition (Actual Trades not Involving Sabres). Also, trade rumors and all other thoughts about anything.
Posted
11 minutes ago, SABRES 0311 said:

So you’re saying the value of the pick goes down as the draft number increases. 

Technically, I think Sean Tierney is the one saying that.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, SABRES 0311 said:

So you’re saying the value of the pick goes down as the draft number increases. 

 

1 hour ago, Weave said:

Technically, I think Sean Tierney is the one saying that.

He should change his name to Captain Obvious. 

  • Haha (+1) 1
Posted

What interested me about the graph was two fold, not his analysis, where the drop off occurs and the fact that he is averaging over years without giving us standard deviation and variability. Might need to confirm again, not sure.

Posted
17 hours ago, North Buffalo said:

 

Looking at that chart... and ask yourself if there is much difference between spending a 2nd, 3rd, Pu on Skinner vs a 1st, 4th, Malone on Eric Staal....

Posted
7 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

We should try to get Morgan Frost from Philly. 

What does an offer from Buffalo that peaks Philly's interest look like, in your opinion?

Posted
4 minutes ago, jame said:

Looking at that chart... and ask yourself if there is much difference between spending a 2nd, 3rd, Pu on Skinner vs a 1st, 4th, Malone on Eric Staal....

Skinner is 26 and a guy you’d like to add to your core.

Staal is 34.

  • Thanks (+1) 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

We should try to get Morgan Frost from Philly. 

I did not know who this was, but I do now. If Philly is trading everyone it would probably be a rebuild, and a 19 year old star prospect likely isn't on the table

Posted
2 minutes ago, jame said:

What does an offer from Buffalo that peaks Philly's interest look like, in your opinion?

For Morgan Frost? Definitely a first round pick at that point. Probably that and something else. Don't know how much they value Frost. 

If Couturier is available, a 1st, prospect, player. I think you are talking a good prospect to add in there. Not sure who they could want. 

See, I am not against trading a 1st, I am against trading 1 for a rental or an old guy. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, WildCard said:

Guhle and picks. Not sure that would do it, but Mitts is untouchable for me

Like a kid at Neverland, Mitts is definitely touchable in my book. 

Posted
Just now, inkman said:

Like a kid at Neverland, Mitts is definitely touchable in my book. 

He's going to be a star. And, especially considering our sht forward (and especially, center) depth, Mitts is pretty crucial going forward; if he doesn't hit/significantly improve next year, we're kinda *****

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, inkman said:

Like a kid at Neverland, Mitts is definitely touchable in my book. 

Who are you replacing him with next year? There isn't a center in the org that has his potential. I would be hesitant to trade a center for a defender. This team has all the lefty defenders already. Also Casey has 6 less points than Ghost this season. Ghost is in season 4, Casey is in season 1. I wouldn't do that trade. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, dudacek said:

Skinner is 26 and a guy you’d like to add to your core.

Staal is 34.

I'm just talking about the cost.... 

The norm around here is "oh my god, no way am I trading a 1st"

Reality is a late 1st results in little tangible draft difference than an early-mid 2nd+3rd

4 minutes ago, LGR4GM said:

For Morgan Frost? Definitely a first round pick at that point. Probably that and something else. Don't know how much they value Frost. 

If Couturier is available, a 1st, prospect, player. I think you are talking a good prospect to add in there. Not sure who they could want. 

See, I am not against trading a 1st, I am against trading 1 for a rental or an old guy. 

Frost would cost Mittelstadt

Couturier would cost Mittelstadt, 1st, +

Frost is viewed as a top 10 "not yet in the NHL" prospect... he's equivalent to how Mittelstadt was viewed last year.

Posted
Just now, jame said:

I'm just talking about the cost.... 

The norm around here is "oh my god, no way am I trading a 1st"

Reality is a late 1st results in little tangible draft difference than an early-mid 2nd+3rd

There's a pretty solid reason for that

1) We have no prospect pool. 

2) The expansion draft

3) We will have to pay guys like Skinner, Eichel, Dahlin, and possibly Mitts; 1st round picks give you cheap talent

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
Just now, jame said:

I'm just talking about the cost.... 

The norm around here is "oh my god, no way am I trading a 1st"

Reality is a late 1st results in little tangible draft difference than an early-mid 2nd+3rd

I don’t understand what you mean by “I’m just talking about the cost.” You can say “what’s the difference” between what they gave for Skinner and your proposal for Staal without considering the asset you’re targeting. That’s not how this works.

Posted
21 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

 

So Couturier, Voracek and Ghost are all available?  Get on the damn phone. 

Guhle, Mitts, Nylander and two firsts for the lot of em. Maybe have to include okposo to make salaries work. 

I realize Voracek is older and probably has peaked. The deal is really for Couturier and Ghost. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...