Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 minutes ago, Robviously said:

That’s a separate point from him being a JAG. And something you could say about basically every winger we have, including 53 and 23  

It’s not like anyone will disagree with you about the Sabres needing another center. But the Sabres also need more guys that can shoot the puck on net. 

Yes,

Fixed that last line for you.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Robviously said:

That’s a separate point from him being a JAG. And something you could say about basically every winger we have, including 53 and 23  

It’s not like anyone will disagree with you about the Sabres needing another center. But the Sabres also need more guys that can shoot the puck. 

So he's not going to be able to produce without a good centre, and he's also more likely than not a JAG long term. I'm making both points. 

Don't see the rush to call him up to be another Remi Elie. 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
Just now, Scottysabres said:

Well, we ask for secondary scoring, we got a couple. Time for the flying J's to put it away.

First goal was first line generated. As for the second, it seems that guys on the 4th line actually chip in the odd goal. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
16 minutes ago, Thorny said:

So he's not going to be able to produce without a good centre, and he's also more likely than not a JAG long term. I'm making both points. 

Don't see the rush to call him up to be another Remi Elie. 

Remi Elie’s shot on that 2 on 1 is exactly why you’d want to bring him up. 

And you’re just making unrelated points that have nothing to do with each other.

“He might be a JAG.”

”Or he might be good.”

”But he’s not a center.”

”Yeah, obviously we could use a center too.”

”So I’m right!!!”

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Robviously said:

Remi Elie’s shot on that 2 on 1 is exactly why you’d want to bring him up. 

And you’re just making unrelated points that have nothing to do with each other.

“He might be a JAG.”

”Or he might be good.”

”But he’s not a center.”

”Yeah, obviously we could use a center too.”

”So I’m right!!!”

What are you talking about?

I made a simple point, with 2 supporting arguments: 

P: I do not see the rush to call up CJ Smith, because, 

 a) I don't think he'll be more effective within our middle 6 as it currently stands than those currently in it, and, 

b) I don't believe he provides much value long-term,

Disclaimer: I don't dislike CJ and hope he scores a hatty first game if called up. 

 

3 minutes ago, Scottysabres said:

Secondary scoring, even helped, is a welcome surprise ?

But scoring from the defense hasn't been an issue. When people say secondary scoring they are usually referring to our bottom 9. Larsson certainly qualifies as a welcome one. 

Edited by Thorny
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...