Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
  On 12/30/2018 at 1:16 AM, Robviously said:

That’s a separate point from him being a JAG. And something you could say about basically every winger we have, including 53 and 23  

It’s not like anyone will disagree with you about the Sabres needing another center. But the Sabres also need more guys that can shoot the puck on net. 

Expand  

Yes,

Fixed that last line for you.

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
  On 12/30/2018 at 1:16 AM, Robviously said:

That’s a separate point from him being a JAG. And something you could say about basically every winger we have, including 53 and 23  

It’s not like anyone will disagree with you about the Sabres needing another center. But the Sabres also need more guys that can shoot the puck. 

Expand  

So he's not going to be able to produce without a good centre, and he's also more likely than not a JAG long term. I'm making both points. 

Don't see the rush to call him up to be another Remi Elie. 

Edited by Thorny
Posted
  On 12/30/2018 at 1:23 AM, Thorny said:

So he's not going to be able to produce without a good centre, and he's also more likely than not a JAG long term. I'm making both points. 

Don't see the rush to call him up to be another Remi Elie. 

Expand  

Remi Elie’s shot on that 2 on 1 is exactly why you’d want to bring him up. 

And you’re just making unrelated points that have nothing to do with each other.

“He might be a JAG.”

”Or he might be good.”

”But he’s not a center.”

”Yeah, obviously we could use a center too.”

”So I’m right!!!”

Posted (edited)
  On 12/30/2018 at 1:44 AM, Robviously said:

Remi Elie’s shot on that 2 on 1 is exactly why you’d want to bring him up. 

And you’re just making unrelated points that have nothing to do with each other.

“He might be a JAG.”

”Or he might be good.”

”But he’s not a center.”

”Yeah, obviously we could use a center too.”

”So I’m right!!!”

Expand  

What are you talking about?

I made a simple point, with 2 supporting arguments: 

P: I do not see the rush to call up CJ Smith, because, 

 a) I don't think he'll be more effective within our middle 6 as it currently stands than those currently in it, and, 

b) I don't believe he provides much value long-term,

Disclaimer: I don't dislike CJ and hope he scores a hatty first game if called up. 

 

  On 12/30/2018 at 1:45 AM, Scottysabres said:

Secondary scoring, even helped, is a welcome surprise ?

Expand  

But scoring from the defense hasn't been an issue. When people say secondary scoring they are usually referring to our bottom 9. Larsson certainly qualifies as a welcome one. 

Edited by Thorny
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...