Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

What's point of Thompson on the 4th line? That line was working well the way it was. i dont think hes defensively responsible enough for that. Sheary continuing his slide out of relevancy, not so sure he gets re-signed unless he picks up his play 

Edited by Marions Piazza
Posted
4 minutes ago, LTS said:

I think Ullmark stretched something a little too far on one of those late game saves the other night.  He looked slow to get up... he made the save though!  ?

I think so, too.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Marions Piazza said:

What's point of Thompson on the 4th line? That line was working well the way it was. i dont think hes defensively responsible enough for that. Sheary continuing his slide out of relevancy, not so sure he gets re-signed unless he picks up his play 

Sheary is great for what he is. But I agree on Thompson

Bottom line is Mitts needs to play better, and then his wingers won't have a constant turnover rate as to who he's playing with. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, WildCard said:

Mean that's what the big descriptors in the corners are for Smell ?

Sure. But it's the various regions in between that confuse me.

The Sabres are ... a little dull and a bit lucky?

Posted
Just now, That Aud Smell said:

Sure. But it's the various regions in between that confuse me.

The Sabres are ... a little dull and a bit lucky?

Kinda. We don't shoot a lot but we don't let up a lot of shots against. What that chart fails to quantify is how good those shots are. Hence Carolina is so far in the 'Good' zone despite a mediocre record and 84 goals for. For reference, that's 29th in the league. So, is Carolina really 'Good'? Well, not really. They just shoot a lot

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
42 minutes ago, Brawndo said:

Rodrigues-Mittelstadt-Pominville
Sheary-Sobotka-Okposo
Thompson-Larsson-Girgensons

Finally shook up the lines.  I just hope Thompson works okay in a shutdown role.  That's not who I would put with Mitts but let's see how that works.

Posted
35 minutes ago, LTS said:

I think Ullmark stretched something a little too far on one of those late game saves the other night.  He looked slow to get up... he made the save though!  ?

Oh, I didn't notice:  VINZANITY returns!

Posted
37 minutes ago, Marions Piazza said:

What's point of Thompson on the 4th line? That line was working well the way it was. i dont think hes defensively responsible enough for that. Sheary continuing his slide out of relevancy, not so sure he gets re-signed unless he picks up his play 

The reach man, the REACH.  I don't have a problem with him there.

Posted

Don't quite understand the bottom 3 lines but I have to give HCPH some trust cause whatever he's doing is working.

BUT.

The 4th line of Girgs, Larsson & EROD has been effective, why break that up?

The middle 6 worries me but I find solace knowing JBOT is still building, and we have 4 1st rounders in the next 2 years. I really hope Nylander or Olofsson can make the jump soon.

If it were up to me I'd roll a youth line of  Sheary - Mittelstadt - Thompson and a corpse line of Pominville - Sobotka - Okposo.

 

Go Sabres! These divisional games are always important standings-wise. Don't let them gain any ground!

Posted (edited)
26 minutes ago, Brennan Huff said:

Can someone explain to me why Ryan Vinz is backing up Hutton?

I would speculate that you want two goalies for practice, and if Ullmark is basically okay but they want to give him a maintenance day to nurse a minor muscle pull or something, you don't need to call up a replacement from Rochester, you use Vinz for your second practice goalie.  I fully expect that Ullmark will back up Huts.  If Ullmark is truly day-to-day and they don't want him to back up today, Wedgewood is probably on his way up from Rochester as we speak.

Edited by Doohickie
  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Doohickie said:

I would speculate that you want two goalies for practice, and if Ullmark is basically okay but they want to give him a maintenance day to nurse a minor muscle pull or something, you don't need to call up a replacement from Rochester, you use Vinz for your second practice goalie.  I fully expect that Ullmark will back up Huts.  If Ullmark is truly day-to-day and they don't want him to back up today, Wedgewood is probably on his way up from Rochester as we speak.

That makes sense. Thank you 

Posted

 

31 minutes ago, WildCard said:

Kinda. We don't shoot a lot but we don't let up a lot of shots against. What that chart fails to quantify is how good those shots are. Hence Carolina is so far in the 'Good' zone despite a mediocre record and 84 goals for. For reference, that's 29th in the league. So, is Carolina really 'Good'? Well, not really. They just shoot a lot

I think I misspoke about "lucky" -- at least with regard to the posted chart. I had another chart in mind (where the Sabres show as a little bit fortunate (or maybe just solid in net)).

Posted
3 minutes ago, That Aud Smell said:

 

I think I misspoke about "lucky" -- at least with regard to the posted chart. I had another chart in mind (where the Sabres show as a little bit fortunate (or maybe just solid in net)).

We've been very solid in net for sure. I just wanted to point out how misleading some of these charts can be

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)

Thompson with the Baltic brothers robs that pair of their biggest strength IMO and means Eichel should be playing Barkov all night.

The middle six? Why not?

Edited by dudacek
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...