Jump to content

A trade proposal so dumb that we should talk about it: P Kane to Buffalo


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I'm not posting the link but will post the tweet, they clearly want clicks. Don't go to the site. Never go there again. 

Trade is: Patrick Kane for Reinhart, Pommers, Ukka-Pekka Lukkonnen, Brendan Guhle, Victor Olofsson, and 3 first round picks. (Buffalo's first this year, SJS pick this year, and then STL Blues pick next year).

 

I will never go to the Hockey News again for anything. The fact the rest of the people didn't immediately call this trade absolute garbage is shocking. Discuss. 

 

Edited by LGR4GM
Posted (edited)

This solves all of the blackhawks needs for a quick turn around , no wonder he proposes such a deal.

Also we just don't have the cap room, not even with the people he proposes in this trade.

I would counter with Okposo/Guhle/Sobotka/SJS1st.   because in the end he is a capdump for them.

Edited by Huckleberry
Posted

I have very little interest in Kane, but any deal from the Sabres perspective would require Okposo or Berglund going back and net the Hawks maximum of two Guhle/late first equivalents.

Posted

No. 

I've seen this bantered about for a couple of months now and no. We don't need those negative waves. I don't care how good a player he is. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I'd do it in a heartbeat less Olofsson and 1 of the firsts.     But I'd want Seabrook as well, and make them take on a cap guy like Okposo who will help with their tank-a-thon.

The cap is going up and quality veteran leadership is at a premium.

Posted

Talent is at a premium. There's veterans everywhere and we seem fine on that leadership currently. I wouldn't touch Seabrook. 6 more years at 6.8m? What a waste of cap. It may go up but so will the cost of players. 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

I've said this before, but I'd trade KO, Guhle and Nylander for Kane in a heartbeat, and I'd probably throw in a late 1st if needed.  But there is no deal if they don't take back KO.

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted (edited)
34 minutes ago, pi2000 said:

Dahlin needs a guy like Seabrook to learn from.    His growth will be stunted otherwise.

You could put Rasmus Dahlin with Craig Rivet and it wouldn't stunt his growth 1 bit. Rasmus Dahlin... will be fine. 

Edited by LGR4GM
Posted
3 hours ago, LGR4GM said:

I'm not posting the link but will post the tweet, they clearly want clicks. Don't go to the site. Never go there again. 

Trade is: Patrick Kane for Reinhart, Pommers, Ukka-Pekka Lukkonnen, Brendan Guhle, Victor Olofsson, and 3 first round picks. (Buffalo's first this year, SJS pick this year, and then STL Blues pick next year).

Ah, good times. I haven't had this good of a chuckle since I fooled Padme by pretending to get hurt falling off the shaak by the waterfalls on Naboo.

On a more recent note, what does he think Kane is? Like two Herschel Walkers combined?

 

  • Like (+1) 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, DarthEbriate said:

Ah, good times. I haven't had this good of a chuckle since I fooled Padme by pretending to get hurt falling off the shaak by the waterfalls on Naboo.

On a more recent note, what does he think Kane is? Like two Herschel Walkers combined?

 

Yeah, but Kane is from buffalo (eyeroll)

Posted
52 minutes ago, PerreaultForever said:

I'm just shocked they wouldn't want Moulson as part of the deal, that's a deal breaker.

They'd have to up the draft pick I mentioned earlier to a 3rd rounder if they want Moulson.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...