Sabres Fan in NS Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 14 minutes ago, Chevyvanmiller said: Thanks, Brother. I've been over at TSW for years and have lurked here often, so I know the proper rules of engagement. Thanks for the "Like" and I look forward to doing my best to add a bit to this great community. If you are over 'there' for years you should find our dysfunctional family very calm. And don't worry about adding a bit. I have over 12,500 posts and I know very little about hockey, but I know how to BS and where to post the stuff I know about in other threads. In case you don't know there are several fun (?) Clubs here now that one can sign up for. These are for broad discussion of the main Sabres / hockey board. There are several off topic discssion still on the main board that are very interesting. The biggest clubs are futbal (soccer) and politics. Love futbal, but politics is not my cup of tea. Quote
pi2000 Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 Just now, GASabresIUFAN said: Jbot has a plan. Hutton got a 3 year deal at low starter/hi backup money. Ullmark is well on his way to earning at least a new 2-3 year deal. Depending on the money and term will give us a glimpse of Jbot’s long-term plan. However Jbot also brought over UPL to monitor his development and signed young NHL/AHL vet Wedgewood as additional insurance. The Osgood/Vernon example is a great one. Also Thomas/Rask. Rask served as Thomas backup for 2 years. I suspect Hutton plays out his contract, but like Doohickie I agree that Ullmark becomes the starter at some point. This could happen in year 2 or 3. At that point, if the tandem is still working who could see Hutton stick around for another 2 years. If not, UPL might be ready to be the backup and if not Wedgewood or other 3rd party until UPL is ready. I still think they need to add a goalie prospect or two. They have Ullmark and UPL... that's it. Both are large goaltenders with average athleticism, but we're trending back to smaller more athletic types at that position due to equipment changes. They can't just rely on being big and squaring up to every shot and hoping it hits them... there's too many holes now, so they need to stay ahead of that curve. Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 1 minute ago, pi2000 said: I still think they need to add a goalie prospect or two. They have Ullmark and UPL... that's it. Both are large goaltenders with average athleticism, but we're trending back to smaller more athletic types at that position due to equipment changes. They can't just rely on being big and squaring up to every shot and hoping it hits them... there's too many holes now, so they need to stay ahead of that curve. Johansson is still in the system, but I get your point. He’ll likely address it the next draft. UPL was a 2016 draftee. Quote
Taro T Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 1 hour ago, GASabresIUFAN said: Jbot has a plan. Hutton got a 3 year deal at low starter/hi backup money. Ullmark is well on his way to earning at least a new 2-3 year deal. Depending on the money and term will give us a glimpse of Jbot’s long-term plan. However Jbot also brought over UPL to monitor his development and signed young NHL/AHL vet Wedgewood as additional insurance. The Osgood/Vernon example is a great one. Also Thomas/Rask. Rask served as Thomas backup for 2 years. I suspect Hutton plays out his contract, but like Doohickie I agree that Ullmark becomes the starter at some point. This could happen in year 2 or 3. At that point, if the tandem is still working who could see Hutton stick around for another 2 years. If not, UPL might be ready to be the backup and if not Wedgewood or other 3rd party until UPL is ready. An item to keep in mind is the Seattle draft. I'd expect a small part of giving Hutton the 3 year deal was to make sure that with the expected re-signing of Ullmark the Sabres would have an exposable goalie for that draft. Pretty sure that original plan was to develop Ullmark into the starter and have Hutton dangled to keep from losing a skater they want to keep. Lots of time before then, but right now it looks like the Sabres may be giving up a 2nd to keep both guys. 2 Quote
dudacek Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 9 minutes ago, Taro T said: An item to keep in mind is the Seattle draft. I'd expect a small part of giving Hutton the 3 year deal was to make sure that with the expected re-signing of Ullmark the Sabres would have an exposable goalie for that draft. Pretty sure that original plan was to develop Ullmark into the starter and have Hutton dangled to keep from losing a skater they want to keep. Lots of time before then, but right now it looks like the Sabres may be giving up a 2nd to keep both guys. Good observation. If Ullmark progresses to the point he can seize the crease midway through next season then exposing Hutton (and not dangling an incentive to keep him) would probably be a prudent move. Quote
shrader Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 It's just a gut feeling, but I feel like we're watching an eventual career backup in Ullmark. Quote
IKnowPhysics Posted November 26, 2018 Report Posted November 26, 2018 18 hours ago, Eleven said: They don't. It's looking like 2 this coming June and 2 the June after. Botterill's playing the long con. STL will be forced to give us a 1st overall in 2020. 2 Quote
Doohicksie Posted November 27, 2018 Report Posted November 27, 2018 3 hours ago, shrader said: It's just a gut feeling, but I feel like we're watching an eventual career backup in Ullmark. Your gut feeling leaves me feeling nothing. I think you're wrong. Quote
R_Dudley Posted November 27, 2018 Report Posted November 27, 2018 He said his plan was to build the team through the draft, building from the farm up and by learning how to win. He got rid of some terrible contracts and bad fit of other players and is working the salary cap back into manageable shape. The talent pool looks to be in better shape than i can remember and we still have some nice draft capital going forward. He has done a fantastic job so far and faster than I hoped it would happen. I think we should keep him. 2 Quote
matter2003 Posted November 28, 2018 Author Report Posted November 28, 2018 On 11/26/2018 at 5:29 PM, shrader said: It's just a gut feeling, but I feel like we're watching an eventual career backup in Ullmark. Why? Ullmark has played very well for the most part everytime he has been called upon. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 28, 2018 Report Posted November 28, 2018 On 11/26/2018 at 3:20 PM, IKnowPhysics said: Botterill's playing the long con. STL will be forced to give us a 1st overall in 2020. Would't it be great if they continue to crash and burn and we somehow win the lottery in 2020 with that pick. Quote
shrader Posted November 28, 2018 Report Posted November 28, 2018 9 hours ago, matter2003 said: Why? Ullmark has played very well for the most part everytime he has been called upon. I wouldn't be surprised if the whole reason is that I've lucked my way into missing his good starts. Quote
Doohicksie Posted November 28, 2018 Report Posted November 28, 2018 (edited) He's only had one bad start where he gave up 5 goals in two periods to Montreal. Hutton came in for the 3rd period and the Sabres won, starting The Streak. The Sabres have all wins and one OT loss in his other starts. Edited November 28, 2018 by Doohickie Quote
... Posted November 28, 2018 Report Posted November 28, 2018 Ullmark showed us over the weekend that he's been learning Hutton's tricks. I though his handling of the puck looked improved and he was clearly comfortable acting as the 3rd d-man in the back end taking passes when necessary. I think he looks better than a backup-in-training, but you never know with these goalies. Quote
PerreaultForever Posted November 28, 2018 Report Posted November 28, 2018 Ullmark for me still has a little Lehner influence on him. Makes several great saves but then lets in an easy one. Not tight to the post or leaves an opening, stuff like that. He's still improving though so I see no issues at all. Quote
matter2003 Posted November 29, 2018 Author Report Posted November 29, 2018 (edited) 6 hours ago, PerreaultForever said: Ullmark for me still has a little Lehner influence on him. Makes several great saves but then lets in an easy one. Not tight to the post or leaves an opening, stuff like that. He's still improving though so I see no issues at all. Yeah but he is really good in shootouts, so that is where the comparison to Lehner stops...we would have lost 3-1 the other night if Lehner was in there. Edited November 29, 2018 by matter2003 1 Quote
grinreaper Posted November 29, 2018 Report Posted November 29, 2018 On 11/28/2018 at 8:56 AM, shrader said: I wouldn't be surprised if the whole reason is that I've lucked my way into missing his good starts. You need to watch games on Saturday. Ullmark is our Saturday GT. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.