Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, PASabreFan said:

Someone tell me what deliberate offside is.

You know you're offsides  in the offensive zone, usually you're the lone forechecker and never tagged up, and just touch it on purpose 

Posted
1 minute ago, WildCard said:

You know you're offsides  in the offensive zone, usually you're the lone forechecker and never tagged up, and just touch it on purpose 

It's never called.

That was a big shot block by Ristolainen near the left dot.

Posted
1 minute ago, WildCard said:

'how much discombobulated...how the hard....'

 Rob Ray is on an absolute heater today 

Mitts should shoot more. Wicked wrister 

They all should shoot more

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted
1 minute ago, WildCard said:

'how much discombobulated...how the hard....'

 Rob Ray is on an absolute heater today 

No, you're right.  Maybe it's too early for Rob.  He may need a few pops before a game and the afternoon games don't allow that.

  • Sad 1
Posted

I think various "line" infractions should be treated uniformly, which is why I hate that you can challenge offsides but they're so lax on hitting the red line for icings. 

Teams deliberately ice the puck when under pressure, knowing what they're doing, and also do it when they miss a pass on accident, and the icings aren't treated differently. And that's more relevant/important to gameplay than a play that's already offsides. 

Posted

I absolutely hate Housley's insistence on off balance wristers from the corners on the point. That works, what? 1/100 times? There has to be some other better option. Either send it down low or across to your partner

Posted

I like that Skinner, Sheary, Pommers really want to get to the front of the net. All guys that came in from outside of the organization (with the obvious caveat for Pominville) 

Just now, WildCard said:

I absolutely hate Housley's insistence on off balance wristers from the corners on the point. That works, what? 1/100 times? There has to be some other better option. Either send it down low or across to your partner

There's evidence to suggest that he really wants this to be a staple of their game unfortunately 

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said:

There's evidence to suggest that he really wants this to be a staple of their game unfortunately 

Oh 100% he does. It's been obvious for awhile, I just figured at some point he'd learn. Unfortunately if I've learned one thing about Housley it's that he's a slow learner, if he does at all

Edited by WildCard
Posted
1 minute ago, hockeyhound said:

O.K. scored a goal, wasn't pretty but, it's in the net and we have a lead going into the 3rd.

Let's Go Buffalo!

Ah, going into second.

Posted

I think @dudacek was onto something with Kyle. He's more useful down low using his shoulders for guys like Casey who have less strength right now than he is up above the net in a place you need playmaking and good/quick shooting to happen. That's why the 71-37-21 line has worked in their very brief time together. 

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...