Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The goal was def interference, but this team is super super bad, whoever said that the shot differential winning is not sustainable, this is exhibit A of why they're right. Hell, if not for Hutton, it would be 5-0

Posted

That’s interference. I don’t think it should be but it is. Okposo didn’t actually make any “extra” motions to interfere or move the puck after the initial contact on his stick but that’s now how the rule works.

Posted
Just now, Wyldnwoody44 said:

The goal was def interference, but this team is super super bad, whoever said that the shot differential winning is not sustainable, this is exhibit A of why they're right. Hell, if not for Hutton, it would be 5-0

+1 this team is bad

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...