WildCard Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) I think a lot of the answer to this will make or break the RoR for a lot of posters. So, what do you think Botterill's plan is for these picks? Edit: How do I make the votes public? Edited July 2, 2018 by WildCard Quote
Brawndo Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 He keeps one and trades the lowest as a part of a package for a winger in the 22-25yo range Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 He keeps one and trades the lowest as a part of a package for a winger in the 22-25yo range I actually like this idea. I know I'm raging about the ROR trade, but I can both continue to be angry and still get excited about the coming season with other moves. Watch him trade them both for Max Pacioretty :lol: Quote
WildCard Posted July 2, 2018 Author Report Posted July 2, 2018 He keeps one and trades the lowest as a part of a package for a winger in the 22-25yo range This is exactly what I want. But that trade with how you described it doesn't happen until next summer Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 I think he uses them all. He might want to use them as trade chips for young players, but I don't see him finding a taker for that. Quote
WildCard Posted July 2, 2018 Author Report Posted July 2, 2018 I think he uses them all. He might want to use them as trade chips for young players, but I don't see him finding a taker for that. I'm gonna lose it if this is really what happens Quote
darksabre Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 I think he'll trade at least one. He may trade two. He'll keep at least one. I think Ottawa, a team that is about to lose Karlsson and has no 2019 1st round pick, would be an ideal trade partner for one of those picks. A first for a prospect of some kind. Or a prospect and taking Okposo as a cap dump. I could see swapping one of the 2019 firsts for a 2020 first just to spread things out a bit. He has a lot of options. Those extra picks are great tools. Are there other teams that don't have a 2019 1st next year that might want one? Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 I'm gonna lose it if this is really what happens Well let me put it to you like this. Would you trade Guhle for a late 1st? Teams aren't trade NHL-ready players on ELCs for late 1st round picks. Quote
Brawndo Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 This is exactly what I want. But that trade with how you described it doesn't happen until next summer Not necessarily, there were conditions placed on the 1st in the Kane Deal. The Jets got to the higher of the Minnesota and St Louis First Rounders, Botterill can put similar conditions on these picks Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 I think he'll trade at least one. He may trade two. He'll keep at least one. I think Ottawa, a team that is about to lose Karlsson and has no 2019 1st round pick, would be an ideal trade partner for one of those picks. A first for a prospect of some kind. Or a prospect and taking Okposo as a cap dump. I could see swapping one of the 2019 firsts for a 2020 first just to spread things out a bit. He has a lot of options. Those extra picks are great tools. Are there other teams that don't have a 2019 1st next year that might want one? Pageau Pageau Pageau Pageau Quote
Brawndo Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Well let me put it to you like this. Would you trade Guhle for a late 1st? Teams aren't trade NHL-ready players on ELCs for late 1st round picks. Unless you are Fenton and are already on record saying you would like to shake up your core namely Nino, Zucker and Coyle. What does Nylander or McCabe or one of those firsts or a combination of those get you? Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Unless you are Fenton and are already on record saying you would like to shake up your core namely Nino, Zucker and Coyle. What does Nylander or McCabe or one of those firsts or a combination of those get you? If we could get Nino and Zucker for a combination of 3 lesser assets I would renounce everything bad I've ever said about jason Quote
darksabre Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Pageau Pageau Pageau Pageau Pageau is absolutely who I would be targeting in Ottawa. Quote
WildCard Posted July 2, 2018 Author Report Posted July 2, 2018 Pageau Pageau Pageau Pageau Pageau is absolutely who I would be targeting in Ottawa. Why? His regular and advanced stats are awful Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Unless you are Fenton and are already on record saying you would like to shake up your core namely Nino, Zucker and Coyle. What does Nylander or McCabe or one of those firsts or a combination of those get you? Nothing from anyone who watched them play last season :lol: Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Why? His regular and advanced stats are awful Being the shutdown C in Boucher's world is not a glamorous job. The guy can play. Quote
WildCard Posted July 2, 2018 Author Report Posted July 2, 2018 Being the shutdown C in Boucher's world is not a glamorous job. The guy can play. I want speed and offense though, not more slow guys that can contain someone else and not really do anything extraordinary offensively Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 (edited) I want speed and offense though, not more slow guys that can contain someone else and not really do anything extraordinary offensively I might be conflating players and have to change my mind, but I'm pretty sure Pageau is fast. And I'm not saying he'd solve our problems, I just pictured addressing our bottom six by things like that Armia trade, plus one like it for a Pageau, rather than using Ryan goddamn O'Reilly Edited July 2, 2018 by Randall Flagg Quote
Eleven Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 Not so sure it's going to be 3. That Central division is TOUGH. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 There are only 2 pieces from Ottawa I have any interest in: Stone and Chabot. We're not getting either of them for our poop. Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 There are only 2 pieces from Ottawa I have any interest in: Stone and Chabot. We're not getting either of them for our poop. Our Lord Erik Karlsson smites thee. Quote
dudacek Posted July 2, 2018 Report Posted July 2, 2018 We've got extra picks, considerable depth in the prospect pool, and cap flexibility. We are in a prime position to bid on whatever RFA shakes loose. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.