Hoss Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, WildCard said: Well he scored 25 pts in 50 games last year so yeah I'd say he made an impact He also scored 51 pts in 66gp last year, and 7pts in 15 gp this year in the AHL. I'm aware of his stats, both in the AHL and NHL. Neither impress me in the slightest and they definitely don't put a 24-year-old in front of Thompson as a prospect. 1
Randall Flagg Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 Looking closer, I'm not even going to lie, from a pure asset-management standpoint a la NHL 18 I'd probably trade Tage for Oesterle and Hinostroza. I've seen a lot more of the last two, so in reality I'd watch Tage first. But if we had never made the ROR trade and somebody posted in this thread that the Blues trade Tage Thompson for Hinostroza and Oesterle, I guarantee that people would look through the stats and conclude the trade at least fair (and totally uninteresting) But Tage is a Sayber now! Go team 1
Hoss Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 Hinostroza is Danny O'Regan but he cracked the lineup with a team that managed the cap poorly.
Randall Flagg Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 2 minutes ago, Hoss said: Hinostroza is Danny O'Regan but he cracked the lineup with a team that managed the cap poorly. I would be stunned if O'Regan ever totals 25 NHL points on his career
Hoss Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 1 minute ago, Randall Flagg said: I would be stunned if O'Regan ever totals 25 NHL points on his career Same. Point still stands.
WildCard Posted July 12, 2018 Author Report Posted July 12, 2018 Just now, Hoss said: Same. Point still stands. So then he's not Danny O'Regan
Randall Flagg Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Hoss said: Same. Point still stands. How? Hinostroza did that in just over half a season on a non-playoff team, so if you concur about O'Regan, well, Hinostroza has already destroyed the supposed conclusion for O'Regan as a valuable comparison piece. At least you'd have to move onto a guy like Brian Flynn or somebody that has a few seasons of NHL games under their belt to illustrate your indifference toward the player, no? Talk about semantics, I know haha. Anywho, the Yotes definitely have the most bizarre composition of any roster in the NHL IMO Edited July 12, 2018 by Randall Flagg
Randall Flagg Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 Let's try to make some Coyotes lines: Keller - Stepan - Panik Perlini - Galchenyuk - Fischer Grabner - Dvorak - Strome Crouse - Richardson - Hinostroza OEL - Hjalmarsson Chychrun - Demers Connauton - Goligoski Raanta Kuemper
Hoss Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 10 minutes ago, WildCard said: So then he's not Danny O'Regan He is. Read what I said. He's Danny O'Regan but got a shot at an NHL roster because of lack of organizational depth in Chicago. San Jose has a ton of depth. I don't think O'Regan will ever get a meaningful shot at the NHL.
Thorner Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 (edited) 27 minutes ago, Randall Flagg said: Looking closer, I'm not even going to lie, from a pure asset-management standpoint a la NHL 18 I'd probably trade Tage for Oesterle and Hinostroza. I've seen a lot more of the last two, so in reality I'd watch Tage first. But if we had never made the ROR trade and somebody posted in this thread that the Blues trade Tage Thompson for Hinostroza and Oesterle, I guarantee that people would look through the stats and conclude the trade at least fair (and totally uninteresting) But Tage is a Sayber now! Go team "Missster Thompson, our..new...celebrity" FTFY. Honestly, you are the Severus Snape of SS nowadays. It's awesome. Edited July 12, 2018 by Thorny
TrueBlueGED Posted July 12, 2018 Report Posted July 12, 2018 53 minutes ago, Hoss said: He is. Read what I said. He's Danny O'Regan but got a shot at an NHL roster because of lack of organizational depth in Chicago. San Jose has a ton of depth. I don't think O'Regan will ever get a meaningful shot at the NHL. But O'Regan isn't in San Jose anymore. If he still doesn't get a meaningful shot at the NHL, I'm perfectly willing to conclude he's a worse prospect than Hinostroza. 1
Hoss Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 8 minutes ago, TrueBlueGED said: But O'Regan isn't in San Jose anymore. If he still doesn't get a meaningful shot at the NHL, I'm perfectly willing to conclude he's a worse prospect than Hinostroza. Someone mentioned Flynn above and I feel like that may be a better comparison. But I do think they're on similar levels of skill and O'Regan just hasn't gotten the opportunity Hinostroza has. And I don't think either has a significant NHL future in front of them.
Thorner Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 (edited) I think Thompson has a better chance at carving out a long-term place in the league because he seems to have the potential to exist within a niche role. He has that one stand out skill that can sometimes allow guys to find their spot on a team. In Thompson's case, from all accounts he has a brilliant shot - exactly what the doctor ordered for the Sabres. Some guys make a career out of one main skill. Obviously can't make a direct comparison between the two, but Patrik Laine literally can't skate, or do much of anything at a level above average, but when he's stands around and waits for a perfect feed, he can cash that feed better than, perhaps, anyone else in the league right now. He'll probably win multiple Rocket Richard trophies based solely on having a great shot. Edited July 13, 2018 by Thorny
WildCard Posted July 13, 2018 Author Report Posted July 13, 2018 Found this pretty interesting: I read an article awhile back that claimed Ken Holland was a fantastic GM before the cap, and he's been a garbage one since. Well, before the cap in 2003-2004, the Red Wings salary cap was $78M. For reference, the cap this year will be $79M. Even worse? Adjusting for inflation, the Red Wings cap today would be $106M https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comments/8yfsox/nhl_salary_cap_has_finally_caught_up_to_red_wings/
Doohicksie Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 And yet the Wings won a Cup in 2008. Hmm.
Hoss Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 The Golden Knights just signed Fleury to a 3 year extension worth $21 mill. That’s... a lot.
WildCard Posted July 13, 2018 Author Report Posted July 13, 2018 10 minutes ago, Hoss said: The Golden Knights just signed Fleury to a 3 year extension worth $21 mill. That’s... a lot. Apparently the goalie market is really ratcheting up. Then again, it is George McPhee
darksabre Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 21 minutes ago, Hoss said: The Golden Knights just signed Fleury to a 3 year extension worth $21 mill. That’s... a lot. That seems like a bad idea.
Randall Flagg Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 When was his current contract expiring?
WildCard Posted July 13, 2018 Author Report Posted July 13, 2018 Just now, Randall Flagg said: When was his current contract expiring? After next season. He'll be 37 when this extension expires 1
Broken Ankles Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 3 hours ago, That Aud Smell said: So much for McPhee being a genius. Quite the contrary. He is 33 and face of the franchise. Have you been to Vegas during the season? The city loves him. His jersey was #4 in sales for 2017/18. The organization recognized about $25-30M in incremental revenue based on 11 Playoff home games that was 100% unplanned. As far as on the ice, during the playoffs he had the best save percentage and second to only Holtby in GAA. Maybe his decline is sharp, but worth risk to lock him in until retirement.
WildCard Posted July 13, 2018 Author Report Posted July 13, 2018 I mean you can extend him, you just don't have to shell out $7M for it McPhee: Marc, let's talk extension Fleury: Sure, I was thinking somewhere around fi.... McPhee: Seven! Same here! Wow, it's crazy how much we're alike, right? Wanna grab a drink later Fleury ...sure? 1
That Aud Smell Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 17 minutes ago, Broken Ankles said: Quite the contrary. He is 33 and face of the franchise. Have you been to Vegas during the season? The city loves him. His jersey was #4 in sales for 2017/18. The organization recognized about $25-30M in incremental revenue based on 11 Playoff home games that was 100% unplanned. As far as on the ice, during the playoffs he had the best save percentage and second to only Holtby in GAA. Maybe his decline is sharp, but worth risk to lock him in until retirement. I get all of that, I guess. And maybe it is actually a good business move. But, in terms of the hockey? The deal is nothing short of bizarre.
Taro T Posted July 13, 2018 Report Posted July 13, 2018 3 minutes ago, WildCard said: I mean you can extend him, you just don't have to shell out $7M for it McPhee: Marc, let's talk extension Fleury: Sure, I was thinking somewhere around fi.... McPhee: Seven! Same here! Wow, it's crazy how much we're alike, right? Wanna grab a drink later Fleury ...sure? Thingisif he's 37 when the contract is due to end then he'll be 34 when it starts & an early retirement as the face of the franchise doesn't hit into the cap. Giving a 1 or 2 year deal forces the team onto the hook later to get that extra year put on. Probably just looking to "do him a solid" for having waived his NMC last off-season. Don't see this as big an oops as others are seeing. Ymmv. 1
Recommended Posts