Huckleberry Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 (edited) I'd go for Coyle, I think he is available in Minny. And we are good at fleecing them Also burakovsky from the caps seems a nice buy low candidate. ? Edited December 20, 2018 by Huckleberry Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 https://thehockeynews.com/news/article/the-kings-need-to-start-tearing-down-and-trading-jeff-carter-might-be-a-good-place-to-start Jeff Carter anyone? Quote
Sabel79 Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 16 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: https://thehockeynews.com/news/article/the-kings-need-to-start-tearing-down-and-trading-jeff-carter-might-be-a-good-place-to-start Jeff Carter anyone? Looks at contract... Nope. Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 28 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: https://thehockeynews.com/news/article/the-kings-need-to-start-tearing-down-and-trading-jeff-carter-might-be-a-good-place-to-start Jeff Carter anyone? no Quote
thewookie1 Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 35 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: https://thehockeynews.com/news/article/the-kings-need-to-start-tearing-down-and-trading-jeff-carter-might-be-a-good-place-to-start Jeff Carter anyone? Not anymore I've seen his contract and found out a bit more about his time in Columbus to know I want him as far away from our team as possible. Quote
Huckleberry Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 Also Carter is rumoured to only want to waive his NTC for the sharks or ducks. He wants to be in california. Quote
nfreeman Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 I've raised the prospect of Carter previously. I would do it in a heartbeat, but only if they take KO, which I don't think they would agree to. Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, nfreeman said: I've raised the prospect of Carter previously. I would do it in a heartbeat, but only if they take KO, which I don't think they would agree to. So then you wouldn't do it in a heartbeat, there is a very specific condition attached to it. Quote
nfreeman Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 24 minutes ago, LGR4GM said: So then you wouldn't do it in a heartbeat, there is a very specific condition attached to it. Really? Quote
pi2000 Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 1 hour ago, Huckleberry said: Also Carter is rumoured to only want to waive his NTC for the sharks or ducks. He wants to be in california. same Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted December 20, 2018 Report Posted December 20, 2018 4 hours ago, nfreeman said: Really? I'm fairness, it's sort of like saying you want to re-sign Skinner but only at $5Mx5. It really means you don't want to sign him. Saying you want Carter but only if the take Okposo really means you don't want Carter. Quote
nfreeman Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 57 minutes ago, TrueBlueGED said: I'm fairness, it's sort of like saying you want to re-sign Skinner but only at $5Mx5. It really means you don't want to sign him. Saying you want Carter but only if the take Okposo really means you don't want Carter. Pretty different scenarios IMHO. There is zero possibility that Skinner would take that contract. There is a real possibility that LA would take KO as part of a package deal for Carter that included other sweeteners. Now, I don’t think it will happen, because I think Carter will make it clear that he doesn’t want to be traded here, and because JB won’t want someone who doesn’t want to be here, and JB also won’t want to part with the amount of sweeteners it would take to get LA to agree. But the concept is not as far-fetched as Skinner taking a 60% discount. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 1 hour ago, nfreeman said: Pretty different scenarios IMHO. There is zero possibility that Skinner would take that contract. There is a real possibility that LA would take KO as part of a package deal for Carter that included other sweeteners. Now, I don’t think it will happen, because I think Carter will make it clear that he doesn’t want to be traded here, and because JB won’t want someone who doesn’t want to be here, and JB also won’t want to part with the amount of sweeteners it would take to get LA to agree. But the concept is not as far-fetched as Skinner taking a 60% discount. I think you're in the realm of delusional on this point. Quote
Andrew Amerk Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 I still think JBOTTS should be calling STL and saying “you owe me” and working out a deal for Tarasenko. 2 Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 (edited) 13 hours ago, nfreeman said: Pretty different scenarios IMHO. There is zero possibility that Skinner would take that contract. There is a real possibility that LA would take KO as part of a package deal for Carter that included other sweeteners. Now, I don’t think it will happen, because I think Carter will make it clear that he doesn’t want to be traded here, and because JB won’t want someone who doesn’t want to be here, and JB also won’t want to part with the amount of sweeteners it would take to get LA to agree. But the concept is not as far-fetched as Skinner taking a 60% discount. Yea, I bet if we add Guhle and a 1st they would take Okposo for Carter. Outside of that you want us to believe that an old slow team with bad contracts that wants to clear those contracts and get younger and faster is going to trade an older guy with a bad contract for another old guy with a worse contract who is a also slower? If the LA Kings trade Carter for Okposo then Jeff Skinner will sign 5x5. It's probably more far fetched because it doesn't make sense unless we pay them to take Okposo which Jbott is literally not going to do. Edited December 21, 2018 by LGR4GM Quote
nfreeman Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 @LGR4GM -- while LA of course wouldn't take KO for Carter straight up, I would seriously consider giving them KO, Guhle and one of the lower #1s for Carter. Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 4 minutes ago, nfreeman said: @LGR4GM -- while LA of course wouldn't take KO for Carter straight up, I would seriously consider giving them KO, Guhle and one of the lower #1s for Carter. Well I sure as hell wouldn't. Giving up assets like that for a player about to turn 34 with another 3 years on his deal... barf. You are making a bad situation worse. At least with Okposo all I have to worry about is the lost cap but you know what I could replace that with? The player I have on an ELC that I got with that late round pick. 1 Quote
nfreeman Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 ...unless of course the guy you get at #22 overall in 2020, once he finally makes it to the NHL in 2023, doesn’t give you any more than Zemgus or Grigorenko or a million other low-1st-rounders who never did anything significant in the NHL — while you could’ve had, for 2019-2021, the skilled, experienced #2 center (who happens to have 2 rings) that the team is dying for right now. Quote
darksabre Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 Botterill isn't going to trade for Jeff Carter. Especially if one of those 1sts is involved. It's not his kind of trade. 1 Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 (edited) 15 minutes ago, nfreeman said: ...unless of course the guy you get at #22 overall in 2020, once he finally makes it to the NHL in 2023, doesn’t give you any more than Zemgus or Grigorenko or a million other low-1st-rounders who never did anything significant in the NHL — while you could’ve had, for 2019-2021, the skilled, experienced #2 center (who happens to have 2 rings) that the team is dying for right now. Oh yea because Mittelstadt is just going to stop developing so we def need Carter for 3 more years. I don't care if he has 2 rings or 10. He's outside of this teams window and he's barely outproducing a 20 yr old rookie. This argument is just, it's bad. You would rather trade multiple pieces for an aging center then actually use those pieces to draft. You cited 1, 1 singular draft in which we didn't hit on mid round 1sts. This isn't the 2012 draft. This isn't the 2012 draft team. If Tampa and Boston and Pittsburgh can find players in the back half of the first there is no reason we can't. Hell of a lot better than wasting assets. The window isn't this year, sorry to tell people that but this year is not it. Next year though... that might be it. Dahlin and Mitts in year 2, another offseason to fix the wings. A deep draft with at least 2 firsts. Those 2 firsts are important if we ever want to be a contender. We are going to need that elc talent. I am 100% against pissing away assets for 3 more years of Jeff Carter. It is a mistake and short sighted just like when we did it in 2015. The argument of "well WHAT IF WE screw UP THE DRAFT!" is weak as well. What if we draft Boeser, Pastrnak, Kuznetsov, Point, Fabbro, Bellows, Mantha, Theodore etc... I would rather give my drafting team a chance then to toss it out the window to fix 1 minor problem this season. Edited December 21, 2018 by LGR4GM Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 Also... the 2012 draft was bad for just about everyone. It was a crappy class. This class is probably in the realm of 2016 and for wingers might be 2015 light. Lots of talent at wing and on defense. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 28 minutes ago, nfreeman said: ...unless of course the guy you get at #22 overall in 2020, once he finally makes it to the NHL in 2023, doesn’t give you any more than Zemgus or Grigorenko or a million other low-1st-rounders who never did anything significant in the NHL — while you could’ve had, for 2019-2021, the skilled, experienced #2 center (who happens to have 2 rings) that the team is dying for right now. On the flip side, 2023 would be a great time for some exciting young talent on an ELC to enter the team. Dahlin and Mittelstadt on (certainly and possibly, respectively) big contracts, Reinhart and Skinner having raises, etc. It's also worth noting that if you're willing to trade Guhle and a 1st, there's likely a better trade out there than Carter. And I realize getting rid of Okposo has significant value, but I think the sweeteners have to be a lot better than your proposal to get LA to bite. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 No other team will trade for KO, simply because the Sabres are not interested in trading him. I am convinced that they still believe that he is a big part of the veteran leadership of this team and that he'll contribute in other ways again soon. He still seems to be recovering from what happened last season. Quote
WildCard Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 24 minutes ago, New Scotland (NS) said: No other team will trade for KO, simply because the Sabres are not interested in trading him. I am convinced that they still believe that he is a big part of the veteran leadership of this team and that he'll contribute in other ways again soon. He still seems to be recovering from what happened last season. Think he has what, under 10 points on the year? Quote
LGR4GM Posted December 21, 2018 Report Posted December 21, 2018 1 minute ago, WildCard said: Think he has what, under 10 points on the year? Okposo? He has 5g and 10a Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.