Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

11. Twitter reporting crews were hauling it down from the rafters this afternoon.

Bert will be in town Thursday for a special ceremony handing it over.

Posted

11. Twitter reporting crews were hauling it down from the rafters this afternoon.

Bert will be in town Thursday for a special ceremony handing it over.

God wouldnt that be something... oh wait thats redundant.
Posted

Rip sucks, so he'll probably be like "you want 59?"

Pretty sure Botterill put Simonek on a pretty short leash regarding #'s. Since 11 & 21 aren't available, my guess is 12.

Posted

11. Twitter reporting crews were hauling it down from the rafters this afternoon.

Bert will be in town Thursday for a special ceremony handing it over.

This would be less offensive to me than an equipment manager dictating numbers.

Posted (edited)

So is this really true, Rip issuing numbers? Or is it an urban legend. I suppose it's true, and it goes to my longstanding point about a sort of "deep state" surrounding the Sabres. The whole coterie of people who can never be fired, who continue to poison the well of Sabres hockey, needs to go. The medical staff, the trainers, the equipment guys, media relations, alumni, broadcasters — president after president, they are immovable. (A few have come and gone, sure. Most have remained. Imagine Larry Playfair and Danny Gare and Rob regaling the kids with woeful tales of past defeats.)

Edited by PASabreFan
Posted

So is this really true, Rip issuing numbers? Or is it an urban legend. I suppose it's true, and it goes to my longstanding point about a sort of "deep state" surrounding the Sabres. The whole coterie of people who can never be fired, who continue to poison the well of Sabres hockey, needs to go. The medical staff, the trainers, the equipment guys, media relations, alumni, broadcasters — president after president, they are immovable. (A few have come and gone, sure. Most have remained. Imagine Larry Playfair and Danny Gare and Rob regaling the kids with woeful tales of past defeats.)

Even if true, doesn't it tell us that Rip may be the best talent evaluator the Sabres have?

 

While I think the idea of "good" and "bad" hockey numbers as being ridiculous, I know that enough people care about it for it to be a thing.

 

With that said, when has Rip ever issued a bad number to someone who was worth squirt? And conversely, all the somewhat decent players we have had, have had those"good" numbers.

Posted (edited)

Weber had 6.

 

Good lord. Zagrapan is like an urban legend around here and he is only 31 years old.

Edited by SwampD
Posted

If it weren't for Nolan wearing 17, maybe Casey would follow Jack's lead and wear his draft year number. Then we could retire 14 all the way through 18 some day ;)

Posted

18

Why are people predicting he'll wear #'s that are unavailable?

 

20 - Wilson

 

18 - Gare

 

He ISN'T wearing 2, 7, 11, 14, 16, 18, nor 39. Not even SHK nor NRK either. ;)

Posted

If it weren't for Nolan wearing 17, maybe Casey would follow Jack's lead and wear his draft year number. Then we could retire 14 all the way through 18 some day ;)

I bet Nolan would give it up.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...