TrueBlueGED Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 minute ago, SwampD said: I kinda forgot there was football on today. I didn't miss it. My general Patriots-induced misery aside, you missed two awesome games. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, TrueBlueGED said: My general Patriots-induced misery aside, you missed two awesome games. So did the refs. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 17 minutes ago, TrueBlueGED said: I think the worst part of this is going to be even more "Tom Brady is unquestionably the GOAT" talk. He threw a game-ending interception! Except some dumb dumb was offsite by a hand, with zero impact on the play. I hate this so much. Everything about it. And seriously, the NFL overtime rules. This is like if MLB decided extra innings at-bats by a coin flip and the first team to get a run wins. Just unbelievably stupid. But if they didn't change it after the Super Bowl two years ago, will they now? I doubt it. Satan won the day today. The Saints got totally hosed by the Robey "non" pass interference. And then, like you say, Brady got bailed out by a totally extraneous guy setting up 6" wrongly. Plus, the Candy Canes are crushing the McClavicles. Lousy day all around. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Just to further prove how much the sports gods hate Buffalo, The Maple Leafs are 3-7 in their last ten games yet they still remain in second place in the Atlantic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Do the Rams have a shot? I think they do. They can get pressure up the middle and stop the run, leaving the Pats one dimensional. They can also win in a shootout, and run the ball too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taro T Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 23 minutes ago, WildCard said: Do the Rams have a shot? I think they do. They can get pressure up the middle and stop the run, leaving the Pats one dimensional. They can also win in a shootout, and run the ball too. This HAS to be the way the evil of the Cheatriots finally gets excised. Their videotaping the Rams practices brought us this virus. Don't expect I can watch, but hoping it finally ends here. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrueBlueGED Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 23 minutes ago, WildCard said: Do the Rams have a shot? I think they do. They can get pressure up the middle and stop the run, leaving the Pats one dimensional. They can also win in a shootout, and run the ball too. The Rams definitely have a shot. I just have zero confidence in Goff against Belichick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Gurley poking fun at the no call PI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robviously Posted January 21, 2019 Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 12 hours ago, TrueBlueGED said: The Rams definitely have a shot. I just have zero confidence in Goff against Belichick. Belichick is money against young QBs, especially with 2 weeks to prepare. Rams will get behind early and that’ll be it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 McVay is far from the first/only coach to do this in football, but the fact that it exists is absolutely hilarious Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 21, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2019 Also, this is the Pats 3rd SB in a row. One more and they'll tie us 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerreaultForever Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 Just a comment from the bleachers. I grew up loving football before hockey. I played high school football and was pretty good but too slow for a higher level. It was always my first sport. In recent years I have reluctantly slowly drifted away and lost interest, mostly because of the cheaters and the way, while it's not exactly fixed, certain outcomes are, shall we say clearly favored. New Orleans was the best team in football this year, they were royally screwed. New England? Far from the best team in football, I didn't watch the game cause it's almost always the same bull. Watching a highlight replay of the roughing the passer call on Brady had me literally fall off the couch laughing. They aren't even trying to disguise it any more. I am SO over football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 I am much more of the college fan today. I guess spending the last 27 years going to UGA football games will do that. However, I totally agree that there was something funny going on in these two games. I did not want the Saints to play in Atlanta, but how do you blow that call. Also when the phantom roughing call and the reversed muffed kick, it was pretty clear that the fix was in. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 35 minutes ago, GASabresIUFAN said: I am much more of the college fan today. I guess spending the last 27 years going to UGA football games will do that. However, I totally agree that there was something funny going on in these two games. I did not want the Saints to play in Atlanta, but how do you blow that call. Also when the phantom roughing call and the reversed muffed kick, it was pretty clear that the fix was in. The video evidence was unequivocal. Edelman did not touch that ball. Not sure how you can use that as evidence of a conspiracy. That had an angle that eliminated a possible touch by every relevant body part. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 22, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 16 minutes ago, SDS said: The video evidence was unequivocal. Edelman did not touch that ball. Not sure how you can use that as evidence of a conspiracy. That had an angle that eliminated a possible touch by every relevant body part. It didn't eliminate it, it was not conclusive and the call on the field was he touched it. There's no way they should've overturned that 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoss Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) 46 minutes ago, SDS said: The video evidence was unequivocal. Edelman did not touch that ball. Not sure how you can use that as evidence of a conspiracy. That had an angle that eliminated a possible touch by every relevant body part. I disagree that the video was definitive on Edelman. It did not touch his thumbs. I couldn’t tell from any angle if it touched his fingertip when it landed or if it grazed his arm on passing. My gut tells me he didn’t touch it and I don’t think it was wildly wrong for them to overturn it but I don’t believe it was definitive. The roughing the passer call, though? That was egregious. And the offsides call was as ticky tack as it gets. Guys lineup with a head over the ball pretty regularly. Andy Reid questioned why it was flagged there, too. Also, the first big Hogan catch on third down also was not a catch. Not even by the new rules. He traps the ball but then it hits the ground and moves and he needs to change arms to secure it. At no point did he secure it before it touched the ground. I do believe, if the games were reffed fairly in those big moments, it should be Saints vs Chiefs. Edited January 22, 2019 by Hoss 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 I can't wait for Tom Brady to play 5 more years and make 5 more super bowls. Go ahead and book that..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 22, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 1 minute ago, ubkev said: I can't wait for Tom Brady to play 5 more years and make 5 more super bowls. Go ahead and book that..... By that point him and the other machines will have their revolution and we won't matter anyways Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, WildCard said: By that point him and the other machines will have their revolution and we won't matter anyways He will be the first fully bionic, partially cybernetic athlete. He's going to play for 16 more years and then the NFL will fold. The bills will never make another championship game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 22, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 (edited) 33 minutes ago, ubkev said: He will be the first fully bionic, partially cybernetic athlete. He's going to play for 16 more years and then the NFL will fold. The bills will never make another championship game. Still, at least Kelly and Marv don't try and make out with their kids Edited January 22, 2019 by WildCard 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, WildCard said: Still, at least Kelly and Marv don't try and make out with their kids Word! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GASabresIUFAN Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 3 hours ago, WildCard said: It didn't eliminate it, it was not conclusive and the call on the field was he touched it. There's no way they should've overturned that The ball looks to change direction as it grazes his hand. I agree there was no conclusive video and the call on the field should have stood. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SDS Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 10 hours ago, GASabresIUFAN said: The ball looks to change direction as it grazes his hand. I agree there was no conclusive video and the call on the field should have stood. Sigh. At the 10s mark - it is UNEQUIVOCAL that the ball did not touch 9 of his 10 fingers. The only possibility is his right thumb from the angle shown at the 10s mark. From a different angle you can see that it is does not touch, or even come close to his right hand. https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--VwZNdCJZ--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/zhzpfnipumxro3vrd3nv.mp4 Feel free to provide a single frame of evidence where it touches his hands that cannot be disproven by looking at the other angle and I will gladly donate $100 to the charity of your choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 22, 2019 Author Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 Really SDS, you'd bet your life that that ball didn't touch him at all? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted January 22, 2019 Report Share Posted January 22, 2019 Let.it.go Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.