Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The move back to wing has perhaps ignited Sam. If it took his lacklustre period of time at C to reaffirm to him and the team his proper long term placement, it was more than worth it.

Right? I'm so comfortable moving forward now that we gave it the time. They may try him again in the future when we have better wing depth but there is no longer any "what if" for me. We just doubled the sample size and have come to a more solid conclusion. 

Edited by Randall Flagg
Posted

Well, guys who wins. They do.

 

I was surprised Jack would drop the gloves; I didn't think it was a good idea for the fact that A) Jack could break a finger or worse and B) We end up short handed.

Posted (edited)

Right? I'm so comfortable moving forward now that we gave it the time. They may try him again in the future when we have better wing depth but there is no longer any "what if" for me. We just doubled the sample size and have come to a more solid conclusion.

 

Agreed. Let Sam grow into the contributing top 6 winger that, honestly, we need more than a 3C right now, and likely going forward, with the likes of Asplund, Mittelstadt, and others in the system, and Eichel and ROR up top. If he develops to his full potential, complete with the accompanying confidence, he'll be better equipped to fill in at C in a pinch down the line for an injury when we are a better team, with more depth.

Edited by Thorny
Posted

That last goal against highlights something that rarely gets pointed out with respect to Lehner: Every, single, time, he plays the puck, it's a giveaway. There's absolutely no point. He just flings it around and an opponent gets there first. Without fail. The only time he should ever leave that cage is to stop the puck on the PP when there's no forechecking pressure. Otherwise, our players at least have a chance to win a race and he is prepared to make a save if he just stays put, versus a guaranteed possession for the opponent, with a floundering goalie. 

Posted

What defenseman did Reaves just crush before the whistle?  That had week to week with an UBI written all over it.

 

Reeves has been taking cheap-shots at guys all night long. The refs seem completely blind to the cross checking tonight.

Posted

Agreed. Let Sam grow into the contributing top 6 winger that, honestly, we need more than a 3C right now, and likely going forward, with the likes of Asplund, Mittelstadt, and others in the system, and Eichel and ROR up top. If he develops to his full potential, complete with the accompanying confidence, he'll be better equipped to fill in at C in a pinch down the line for an injury when we are a better team, with more depth.

Plus, is there a single person on Earth who can't see that Sam-Jack-Kane is miles better than Pominville-Jack-Kane? He makes good players better it seems, even if he can't elevate the play of bad ones. I'm seriously tempted to go rewatch games and clock offensive zone time and completed passes at even strength for the two lines to see how big the discrepancy is. My eye test says it's enormous. 

Posted

After the tussle Sam had a smirk on his face, and I think he was whistling the tune from “ My boyfriends back”. But I could be mistaken.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...