Randall Flagg Posted July 25, 2017 Author Report Posted July 25, 2017 True, North Buffalo, WildCard, Thorny. Quote
dudacek Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 Evander Kane  Would not expect you to have him ranked ahead of Montour, Gostisbehere and a few other young defencemen. I guess those earlier arguments were more about need and potential "than whose the best right now?" Quote
WildCard Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 (edited) Would not expect you to have him ranked ahead of Montour, Gostisbehere and a few other young defencemen. I guess those earlier arguments were more about need and potential "than whose the best right now?" Pretty much, and it's based on our teams need and contract situations, not the overall player of right now. Â Â Â Plus I forgot about Ghost Edited July 25, 2017 by WildCard Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 Pretty much, and it's based on our teams need and contract situations, not the overall player of right now. Â I don't think the above is right. Quote
WildCard Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 I don't think the above is right. What do you mean? Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 What do you mean? We are to be picking the BPA, in our opinion. Â You may be thinking of duda's other thread? Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 25, 2017 Author Report Posted July 25, 2017 This [team building] was the big confusion last time, so let's just give it an emphatic No this time. No roster building, taking G because you haven't yet or anything like that. Â Maybe we can do a build-a-team competition at some point too, with posters that didn't make the deadline for this thread but were interested? And contracts don't matter and age of player only matters if you think it will directly affect his performance over the next 82 games Quote
WildCard Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 We are to be picking the BPA, in our opinion.  You may be thinking of duda's other thread? Sorry, I posted that a little ambiguously. I meant to say we're picking BPA here, and I usually advocate a younger defensemen elsewhere because of contract, age, and team need. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 Sorry, I posted that a little ambiguously. I meant to say we're picking BPA here, and I usually advocate a younger defensemen elsewhere because of contract, age, and team need. No worries. It's not the first time that I have not followed the program and it won't be the last. Quote
Eleven Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 Pretty much, and it's based on our teams need and contract situations, not the overall player of right now.    Plus I forgot about Ghost  He didn't have a great sophomore year.  He should have won the Calder in 16, but last year was not nearly as impressive. Quote
WildCard Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 He didn't have a great sophomore year.  He should have won the Calder in 16, but last year was not nearly as impressive. Very true, but I still think he should go about right here. Think he has a really nice bounce-back year this year; there were a lot of reasons he didn't perform up to his Calder standard, but he still played well, especially relative to his teammates. Quote
Randall Flagg Posted July 25, 2017 Author Report Posted July 25, 2017 Stone. That was easy!I'd trade Kane + 1st + prospect for that guy Quote
GASabresIUFAN Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 (edited) I'd trade Kane + 1st + prospect for that guy I had him rated much much higher. Â I would have taken him before Aho, Kane, Okposo and Zetterberg. Â Very underrated player. Edited July 25, 2017 by GASabresFan Quote
Taro T Posted July 25, 2017 Report Posted July 25, 2017 Expecting him to bounce back from the sophomore slump: Shane Ghostberries. (Yes, it's spelled wrong. Deal w/ it. :p) Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.