pi2000 Posted August 2, 2017 Report Posted August 2, 2017 Can we all agree he's kept his nose clean the past year? Maybe he's finally matured a bit. Quote
WildCard Posted August 2, 2017 Report Posted August 2, 2017 Can we all agree he's kept his nose clean the past year? Maybe he's finally matured a bit. I'm more impressed with the fact that he doesn't just hurl his body around like a toy after injuring his ribs, like Kaleta used to do. If he can pick and choose his spots, and not play like that, maybe he isn't hurt all the time. Quote
That Aud Smell Posted August 2, 2017 Report Posted August 2, 2017 Can we all agree he's kept his nose clean the past year? Maybe he's finally matured a bit. I see what you did there. Quote
MattPie Posted August 2, 2017 Report Posted August 2, 2017 The thread wasn't deleted -- just today's 2nd-thoughts material. So hopefully everything is copacetic. Boy, if life were only like that... Awww man, I miss out on all the fun. Quote
Sabres Fan in NS Posted August 2, 2017 Report Posted August 2, 2017 (edited) Was it the field of dreams??? Iowa?? Good guess, but no. It was London and it called me ... :flirt: Hey, oh ... WildCard and Sabre79 too. Edited August 2, 2017 by Sabres Fan In NS Quote
Meathead Posted August 4, 2017 Report Posted August 4, 2017 guys a bonafide jerk but hell of a hockey player. i hope they can keep him, but if not at least trade him for some good value assets Quote
WildCard Posted August 11, 2017 Report Posted August 11, 2017 That’s not to say that Botterill isn’t getting calls,” clarified Dreger. “I don’t know that he is or he isn’t. The party line has been that it’s a team that’s in the win-now mode – that may consider themselves a Stanley Cup contender, perhaps an older team – that would and has showed the most interest in Evander Kane. Dreger | Things are real strange around that Avalanche team “But I think that those general managers with those few clubs would also want to see how he starts the year. Let’s see how his offseason went. It sounds like, in the limited research that I’ve done, that he’s worked pretty hard and he’s motivated going into the contract year. “So my sense is that he’s going to be a contributing player pretty early for Buffalo. And if that is the case, and he’s not moved before then, then maybe his stock rises a little bit. “But I think that we’re going to talk a lot about Evander Kane in the early part of the season specific to some of the trade interest.” https://www.fanragsports.com/news/dreger-sounds-like-evander-kane-motivated-going-contract-year/ Quote
Pokey Jones Posted August 11, 2017 Report Posted August 11, 2017 I would trade him while we still can. One trick pony, injury prone, inconsistent effort and all that other off ice stuff that may be a bad influence on the kids. Quote
Thorner Posted August 14, 2017 Report Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) It sounds like it's only a matter of time until he's traded. Who are our LWs at game 10? Pouliot Girgensons Moulson Deslauriers It'll be a tough playoff march with that left side, even taking into account our depth at centre ice. Edited August 14, 2017 by Thorny Quote
WildCard Posted August 14, 2017 Report Posted August 14, 2017 It sounds like it's only a matter of time until he's traded. Who are our LWs at game 10? Pouliot Girgensons Moulson Deslauriers It'll be a tough playoff march with that left side, even taking into account our depth at centre ice. Given what Brawndo posted in the Around the NHL thread, let's just trade him to Boston and then some for Pasternak Quote
Thorner Posted August 14, 2017 Report Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) Given what Brawndo posted in the Around the NHL thread, let's just trade him to Boston and then some for Pasternak Still catching up on threads after being away all weekend. I'll get there! Nevertheless, outside of striking gold by grabbing a player like Pastrnak, I'll question the decision to trade Kane, in a year where playoffs are the mandate, with what we'd have left on the left side. If he does indeed get moved. Edited August 14, 2017 by Thorny Quote
LGR4GM Posted August 15, 2017 Report Posted August 15, 2017 Given what Brawndo posted in the Around the NHL thread, let's just trade him to Boston and then some for Pasternak I'll give them Kane and a 2nd for Pastrnak. Boston is dumb so maybe they do that. Quote
WildCard Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 (edited) “I’ve talked about this story before, about how the Vancouver team had a big decision years ago, right before the 2012-13 lockout – they considered offer-sheeting Jamie Benn, and I think they were really legitimately thinking about doing it. At the end of the day, they just decided not to because A) they thought Dallas would match, and B) I think they were worried about the repercussions. “I believe at one point – I think I told that story on the morning show last week – and then somebody reached out to me and said that he’d heard at one point in time that Evander Kane had walked into the Canucks’ office and had tried for an offer sheet. And I think the Canucks considered it, but again, same thing. Not to the same level they considered Benn. They really considered that one. And then at the end of the day they considered not to do it. “Now, I have had GMs tell me that they think they are coming because the amount of good players that reach the open market, it’s so few. There’s less free agency than ever. And when I wrote that in my notes, I think it was just before the summer, I had a couple of GMs that called me about it and said, ‘Do you really believe that this is going to happen?’ I said, ‘That’s what some of your peers are telling me.’ “It’s always tough to be the first guy to do it, but I think you’re going to see more. I know there were some people who thought Connor Brown was going to get one in Toronto. But he signed and it was never really an issue.” - Elliot Friedman https://www.fanragsports.com/nhl/friedman-explores-mindset-surrounding-nhl-offer-sheets/ Edited September 13, 2017 by WildCard Quote
erickompositör72 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 (edited) One trick pony, injury prone, inconsistent effort and all that other off ice stuff that may be a bad influence on the kids. The scoring-goals trick is a pretty good trick. I'll take it. Effort is always 100%. Start watching hockey games. "all that other off ice stuff" - clear evidence of bias. What happened in the last year, off ice? Nothing. Get over it, he's fine. No reports of anyone in the locker room having problems with him; only some fans. Edited September 13, 2017 by ericcomposer72 Quote
nfreeman Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 The scoring-goals trick is a pretty good trick. I'll take it. Effort is always 100%. Start watching hockey games. "all that other off ice stuff" - clear evidence of bias. What happened in the last year, off ice? Nothing. Get over it, he's fine. No reports of anyone in the locker room having problems with him; only some fans. Both of these are pretty obnoxious. Quote
erickompositör72 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 Both of these are pretty obnoxious. The way some people talk about Kane here is pretty obnoxious. Tit-for-tat Quote
WildCard Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 Anyone who thinks Kane should be extended is clearly a moron and shouldn't be allowed to ever post on here Quote
pi2000 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 Anyone who thinks Kane should be extended is clearly a moron and shouldn't be allowed to ever post on here Quote
nfreeman Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 The way some people talk about Kane here is pretty obnoxious. Tit-for-tat No, and you need to knock it off. Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 The scoring-goals trick is a pretty good trick. I'll take it. Effort is always 100%. Start watching hockey games. "all that other off ice stuff" - clear evidence of bias. What happened in the last year, off ice? Nothing. Get over it, he's fine. No reports of anyone in the locker room having problems with him; only some fans. Watch him in the defensive zone some time, then tell me about his 100% effort. Quote
erickompositör72 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 Watch him in the defensive zone some time, then tell me about his 100% effort. A winger in the defensive zone? Do wingers now have more responsibility in the defensive zone if their last name is Kane? Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 A winger in the defensive zone? Do wingers now have more responsibility in the defensive zone if their last name is Kane? Hey look, the guy who says "watch the games" doesn't think wingers have defensive responsibilities! Less responsibility than a center does not equal zero responsibility. Quote
pi2000 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 Kane's effort in the d-zone is not the reason he hasn't been extended yet. Why are we even discussing this? Quote
erickompositör72 Posted September 13, 2017 Report Posted September 13, 2017 because it is the only thing anyone seems to be able to criticize. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.