Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am reluctant to assume PHam has any credible sources with knowledge of the contract negotiations who would be willing to share anything with him.  Maybe I am naive.

Posted

As this team gets better there will be more and more acceptance, if not appreciation, for Phams writing as he won't have as much bad news to convey.

 

Already we are seeing, "I agree with this article, surprising coming from Pham".

Posted

As this team gets better there will be more and more acceptance, if not appreciation, for Phams writing as he won't have as much bad news to convey.

 

Already we are seeing, "I agree with this article, surprising coming from Pham".

I mean, a classic example which created #hammymath was blatant dishonesty and/or a fundamental misunderstanding of how to get information from comparing statistics, so we aren't all just sheep that want the bad man to say things we like about our team.

Posted

If I have to choose, I want the latter. Because that means he ripped it up this season.

Poor choice. He's going to rip it up this year. That IS a given. The only way he doesn't is due to injury. Either way, his price isn't going down below what he'd get today.

 

Get him at $10.5/yr now and use that extra $1.5MM on upgrading a Torey Mitchell to a Jochen Hecht. (They'll find room for the Reinharts & McCabes under either Jack Eichel payout scenario.)

Posted

Poor choice. He's going to rip it up this year. That IS a given. The only way he doesn't is due to injury. Either way, his price isn't going down below what he'd get today.

 

Get him at $10.5/yr now and use that extra $1.5MM on upgrading a Torey Mitchell to a Jochen Hecht. (They'll find room for the Reinharts & McCabes under either Jack Eichel payout scenario.)

 

Well. If'n you say so.

Posted

I think Jack ripping it up this year is one of the safest bets in hockey

 

*Excellent*

 

(Monty Burns voice)

 

p.s. I could not, for the life of me, embed a .gif of this, despite a few tries. 

giphy.gif

Posted (edited)

*Excellent*

 

(Monty Burns voice)

 

p.s. I could not, for the life of me, embed a .gif of this, despite a few tries. 

giphy.gif

 

The embedded gif looks to have worked to me.

 

Good job, Liger.

 

EDIT TO ADD:

 

No sound, but I can read lips.

Edited by Sabres Fan In NS
Posted (edited)

Ya, I'd like to formally revise my expectation for Jack Eichel this season. I still maintain that 70 points or more would be a very good-to-great season, in general, but Eichel is clearly more talented than that.

 

Wildcard was right: if he stays healthy, my expectation for Jack is 80 points, or more.

Edited by Thorny
Posted (edited)

^ that sounds like a great poll.

 

If the Sabres make the playoffs, it could be pretty close to equal.

 

My guess is Jack gets a few less. We'll need 95 or so to make it, so. Short of a 100 point season from Jack, if Jack has more points than the Sabres, the Sabres probably failed him.

Edited by Thorny
Posted

 


History shows that in the first year after expansion, scoring numbers for star players tend to rise, with Eichel on an upward trajectory already, a big year could be in the offing if he stays healthy.

 

Well, that's an interesting tidbit 


Just finished reading that. I love Lozo as it is, and couldn't agree with him more.

Besides that chicken wing barb

Posted

Well, that's an interesting tidbit 

 

Besides that ###### chicken wing barb

Yeah, if Lozo can be criticized for anything, it's his insane dislike of wings. Of course, living his entire life in freaking New Jersey, he can't be expected to know any better.

Posted

Yup, but that isn't as much fun.

 

By the way, Burnsie isn't saying 'excellent'.

 

You've just opened up a huge world of fun for animators, sending subliminal messages by having the mouths say something completely different than what the audio says.  My guess is it's been in play forever, mostly telling us about how Jack Eichel is a mediocre hockey player, thus plunging him down anyone's player ratings.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...