Eleven Posted September 22, 2017 Report Posted September 22, 2017 (edited) 7 out of 5 5 out of 7: https://imgur.com/gallery/eDF6K Edited September 22, 2017 by Eleven
Brawndo Posted September 27, 2017 Report Posted September 27, 2017 https://twitter.com/nhl/status/913011592698064897
GoPre Posted September 28, 2017 Report Posted September 28, 2017 Every time I see there's a new post in this thread I get excited w/ the idea Eichel signed. And every time.... :lol:
Brawndo Posted October 2, 2017 Report Posted October 2, 2017 Per Dreger No change in the Eichel negotiation. No reason to read into that, however further discussions could be shelved until next summer.
Thorner Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Per Dreger No change in the Eichel negotiation. No reason to read into that, however further discussions could be shelved until next summer. That's kinda crappy if it's true and there's no chance of something early/mid-season.
WildCard Posted October 3, 2017 Author Report Posted October 3, 2017 Wonder if the contract and the captaincy are at somewhat related
Thorner Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) That's kinda crappy if it's true and there's no chance of something early/mid-season. To add, saw Dreger on "Insider Trading" on TSN, and he said both sides were thinking/hoping they'd get an extension done over the summer before the season, but now that they haven't, Eichel doesn't want the in season distraction, so they'd shelve discussion till next offseason. Wonder if the contract and the captaincy are at somewhat related I'd guess likely. Edited October 3, 2017 by Thorny
pi2000 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Wonder if the contract and the captaincy are at somewhat related Why?
Huckleberry Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 5 out of 7: https://imgur.com/gallery/eDF6K That is a classic :D
LGR4GM Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Good now I don't have to think about this until May
oddoublee Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Why? Yeah - I am not seeing how this would hold up a 'financial' negotiation. There is not much to read into here, in my opinion: Based on his production, the Sabres Mngt believe he probably falls in the approximate 9 million a year range. They want to negotiate based on 'what is'. Eichel and his agent, wisely, want to negotiate on what they believe 'will be' - so they are probably asking for 10-11 million a year. The reasons the negotiation has probably been so cordial; is that both sides understand the other sides position. So it is simple - if Jack put up a 0.75 - 0.80 point per game season, AND they fall short of the playoffs, he is a 9 million dollar player. Maybe 8.5. If he averages a point a game - and serves as a winning force getting them into the playoffs, or close to it, then he gets his 10.5 or higher. Both sides feel like they won with the latter outcome - and I am sure both sides will feel like they lost if the former happens.
WildCard Posted October 3, 2017 Author Report Posted October 3, 2017 Why? Don't pin the captaincy on the kid in the middle of a contract dispute
pi2000 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) Don't pin the captaincy on the kid in the middle of a contract dispute Why? It's not a dispute, he's signed. Edited October 3, 2017 by pi2000
WildCard Posted October 3, 2017 Author Report Posted October 3, 2017 Why? It's not a dispute, he's signed. True. I was thinking it gives him more leverage in talks, but I guess it's not like that would swing the pendulum either way. @NEWS4_NICK Housley said his staff would continue to discuss captaincy today - http://wivb.com/2017/10/02/housley-wont-name-captain-still-evaluating-who-will-wear-a-letter/… @news4buffalo #Sabres
woods-racer Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Yeah - I am not seeing how this would hold up a 'financial' negotiation. There is not much to read into here, in my opinion: Based on his production, the Sabres Mngt believe he probably falls in the approximate 9 million a year range. They want to negotiate based on 'what is'. Eichel and his agent, wisely, want to negotiate on what they believe 'will be' - so they are probably asking for 10-11 million a year. The reasons the negotiation has probably been so cordial; is that both sides understand the other sides position. So it is simple - if Jack put up a 0.75 - 0.80 point per game season, AND they fall short of the playoffs, he is a 9 million dollar player. Maybe 8.5. If he averages a point a game - and serves as a winning force getting them into the playoffs, or close to it, then he gets his 10.5 or higher. Both sides feel like they won with the latter outcome - and I am sure both sides will feel like they lost if the former happens. This sounds right.
erickompositör72 Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) Yeah - I am not seeing how this would hold up a 'financial' negotiation. There is not much to read into here, in my opinion: Based on his production, the Sabres Mngt believe he probably falls in the approximate 9 million a year range. They want to negotiate based on 'what is'. Eichel and his agent, wisely, want to negotiate on what they believe 'will be' - so they are probably asking for 10-11 million a year. The reasons the negotiation has probably been so cordial; is that both sides understand the other sides position. So it is simple - if Jack put up a 0.75 - 0.80 point per game season, AND they fall short of the playoffs, he is a 9 million dollar player. Maybe 8.5. If he averages a point a game - and serves as a winning force getting them into the playoffs, or close to it, then he gets his 10.5 or higher. Both sides feel like they won with the latter outcome - and I am sure both sides will feel like they lost if the former happens. I think it's as simple as that. I'm feeling pessimistic (perhaps prematurely) after the preseason; if Eichel doesn't really reach the level we had all hoped/expected, GMBot was a genius for doing this - as opposed to just giving him what he wants - like I was saying earlier. True. I was thinking it gives him more leverage in talks, but I guess it's not like that would swing the pendulum either way. I'm actually thinking that the Sabres mgmt isn't looking for leverage/looking to low-ball Jack; I think they just simply want to pay him what he's worth, but not any more, and use this season to determine what that figure is. It'd be upsetting if it ended up being around 9mil (for the sake of the team), but very prudent of GMBot to wait it out. Edited October 3, 2017 by ericcomposer72
LTS Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 Good now I don't have to think about this until May You better know how to ignore this topic on here then. If the signing indeed does not occur until May this will easily surpass the longest SabreSpace thread... it might set a Cal Ripken like record.
Brawndo Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sn680cODTKo
WildCard Posted October 3, 2017 Author Report Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sn680cODTKo Still, not as good as Matthews Edited October 3, 2017 by WildCard
SwampD Posted October 3, 2017 Report Posted October 3, 2017 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sn680cODTKo Mario. I can't wait til we have to pay him 10.5MM next year.
Recommended Posts