That Aud Smell Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Here you go It has nothing to do with any insinuation that Lou is a "f.a.g" It has nothing to do with how "slutty" Lou is It has nothing to do with men/women liking or not liking to blow someone. Plenty of people like it. Good for them (and us I guess) It is, again, like I've said, just an absurd statement. It has no deep rooted connotations or some hidden meaning. This isn't Catcher in the Rye. The fact that the word 'chugging' is used makes it more absurd. Kinda like a 'bag of d!cks', because both are impossible. There is no such thing as chugging a d!ck, or a bag of them Can't believe an, albeit what is obviously at this point unapproved of joke on this forum, really needs a deep dive. But here we are. Are we done now? You're certainly done considering the matter. That much is clear. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Here you go It has nothing to do with any insinuation that Lou is a "f.a.g" It has nothing to do with how "slutty" Lou is It has nothing to do with men/women liking or not liking to blow someone. Plenty of people like it. Good for them (and us I guess) It is, again, like I've said, just an absurd statement. It has no deep rooted connotations or some hidden meaning. This isn't Catcher in the Rye. The fact that the word 'chugging' is used makes it more absurd. Kinda like a 'bag of d!cks', because both are impossible. There is no such thing as chugging a d!ck, or a bag of them Can't believe an, albeit what is obviously at this point unapproved of joke on this forum, really needs a deep dive. But here we are. Are we done now? Hold up there. I know I've seen them on sale at Lowe's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 You're certainly done considering the matter. That much is clear. Good Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Here you go It has nothing to do with any insinuation that Lou is a "f.a.g" It has nothing to do with how "slutty" Lou is It has nothing to do with men/women liking or not liking to blow someone. Plenty of people like it. Good for them (and us I guess) It is, again, like I've said, just an absurd statement. It has no deep rooted connotations or some hidden meaning. This isn't Catcher in the Rye. The fact that the word 'chugging' is used makes it more absurd. Kinda like a 'bag of d!cks', because both are impossible. There is no such thing as chugging a d!ck, or a bag of them Can't believe an, albeit what is obviously at this point unapproved of joke on this forum, really needs a deep dive. But here we are. Are we done now? Now you've really taken it up (down?) a notch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Now you've really taken it up (down?) a notch. It's a technical term in my line of work. Not sure what you mean Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 In all seriousness: it's pretty clear (to me, anyway) that the remark was intended as a harmless joke but was viewed by a number of posters as somewhat vulgar/offensive. It doesn't seem like anyone needs to be censured or that jokes in this vein are particularly witty or value-added. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Are we done now? You're certainly done considering the matter. That much is clear. Good It's good that I said you're done? #iambeingpedantic In all seriousness: it's pretty clear (to me, anyway) that the remark was intended as a harmless joke but was viewed by a number of posters as somewhat vulgar/offensive. It doesn't seem like anyone needs to be censured or that jokes in this vein are particularly witty or value-added. Dude! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nfreeman Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 It's a technical term in my line of work. Not sure what you mean I was joking you hoser -- just associating "oral sex" with "deep dive" in a Beavis-and-Butthead-kinda way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eleven Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 In all seriousness: it's pretty clear (to me, anyway) that the remark was intended as a harmless joke but was viewed by a number of posters as somewhat vulgar/offensive. It doesn't seem like anyone needs to be censured or that jokes in this vein are particularly witty or value-added. But can we refer to Lamoriello as an ignorant slut? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 And in French!! Which makes it funnier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inkman Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Been wondering when Lamoriello will catch a breath between chugging d!cks long enough to work the trade linesWe don't tolerate that type of immaturity around here. BTW, great use of chugging d1cks!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Shattenkirk out indefinitely with a torn meniscus in his knee Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randall Flagg Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 I didn't even glance twice when WC said that, but I'm also his exact demographic soooooo maybe early-twenty-something dudes are just people? I can get on board with that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohicksie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Or maybe Babcock really isn't that great? It's possible. While the media can blast him and everyone else the fact remains that the Leafs are struggling right now. Andersen called out his team last night. There are issues up North. As a Detroit fan, I always viewed Babcock as a similar situation as Barry Switzer who succeeded Jimmy Johnson as coach of the Cowboys. Johnson handed over a pretty darned good Cowboys squad and Switzer presided over its descent into mediocrity. Babs was handed a very good Red Wings squad and won an early Cup with them, but he also presided over a slide into mediocrity. Babcock to me is more of a maintainer (at best) than a builder. He's a good coach, but not by any means the best. The joke is just the absurdity of the saying. There's no analysis needed on it Considering all the questions asked of it, yes, analysis is needed. If you don't like all the questions, stop trying to be funny. That wasn't funny, it was just ugly. I'm not so sure. I still haven't figured out how you suck a bag of ######, and now I have to ponder chugging? Chugging? As in milk? Beer? Chug is just one of those trigger words, like moist. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Considering all the questions asked of it, yes, analysis is needed. If you don't like all the questions, stop trying to be funny. That wasn't funny, it was just ugly. Feel free to go back and unravel it then if that's really what you want to spend your time on. I'll make sure to be as professional as possible on here going forward Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohicksie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Yeah the line is stolen from a reddit post where a guy calls his ex (female) that and the absurdity of it was laughed at. Guess I'm the only one to ever make a similar joke on here like that, so I must be a homophobe. No, that's not the correct conclusion. The correct conclusion is that the social norms of reddit and SabreSpace are not the same and you should filter accordingly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WildCard Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 No, that's not the correct conclusion. The correct conclusion is that the social norms of reddit and SabreSpace are not the same and you should filter accordingly. Oh hey look, you're still going. Good for you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 I don't understand what's going on in here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doohicksie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Well, you know, until I feel you've learned something from this, young man, I feel a responsibility to keep harping on you like a parent until a heartfelt apology is obtained. ^ See? This is a joke. And it's not even vulgar. And no, it's not that funny either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brawndo Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 JUST IN: #NHLJets head coach Paul Maurice confirms that goaltender Steve Mason has suffered another concussion. The team has recalled G Michael Hutchinson (per @saraorlesky). MORE: tsn.ca/1.973046 #TSNHockey Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Do we have a goalie the Jets might want? :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubkev Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 I don't understand what's going on in here. Lou Lamoriello has dick on his breath. That all I've gotten so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattPie Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Aud Smell Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 Feel free to go back and unravel it then if that's really what you want to spend your time on. I'll make sure to be as professional as possible on here going forward No one's asked for professionalism. I don't understand what's going on in here. Some (including me) objected to Joker chirping Lou Lamoriello for being away from the trade phones because he was too busy chugging d1cks. (I am taking you at your word that you're confused.) Lou Lamoriello has dick on his breath. That all I've gotten so far. Not really. Saying someone is too busy chugging d1cks is not even tied to the act of oral sex. It's just an absurd turn of phrase, meant to signify nothing, other than to denote an absurdity. My suggested substitution: Been wondering when Lamoriello will stop finger-blasting unicorns long enough to work the trade lines. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darksabre Posted January 19, 2018 Report Share Posted January 19, 2018 No one's asked for professionalism. Some (including me) objected to Joker chirping Lou Lamoriello for being away from the trade phones because he was too busy chugging d1cks. (I am taking you at your word that you're confused.) Not really. Saying someone is too busy chugging d1cks is not even tied to the act of oral sex. It's just an absurd turn of phrase, meant to signify nothing, other than to denote an absurdity. My suggested substitution: Been wondering when Lamoriello will stop finger-blasting unicorns long enough to work the trade lines. That was how I took it. I'm surprised everyone else got so bent out of shape over it. It was Charlie speak. Elected officials in this country say far more sinister things through far less vulgar language on a daily basis, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.