Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

So this now makes sense why Ennis was protected. Adding the 6th wasn't all that kept Vegas from ullmark. I bet part of that deal also included carier being exposed. They were likely never taking Ennis.

Posted

Sure, once someone tells me why I should care about a goalie who was 24th in the AHL in SV%.

Our defense in Rochester was the AHL equivalent of our NHL defense in Buffalo last year.  He was no.1 in the league in shots faced so I'm guessing that had something to do with it.

 

It's not a sexy answer but I think he just passes the eye test when we'e seen him in Buffalo.  At worst he's a capable back-up but I'd like to see what he can do.

Posted (edited)

Worst overpayment by a Sabres GM:

A late first for a goalie with the 12th best save percentage in the NHL?

A late second for a goalie with the 24th best save percentage in the AHL? ????

Edited by dudacek
Posted

I do not understand the Florida expansion pick at all.

Florida says..what's it going to take for you to select Smiths contract... Vegas said throw in marchessault who we would have selected.

Posted (edited)

Florida says..what's it going to take for you to select Smiths contract... Vegas said throw in marchessault who we would have selected.

 

lol wait ? this happened ? 

 

hello our to 2/3 of our 2nd line then.

Edited by Huckleberry
Posted

Again, even if you don't love Ullmark, he's basically the only goalie prospect we have. Tough to let that go. 


I think this was a depth decision
Carrier was one of a half-dozen prospects on the wing.
Ullmark is the only prospect in the net.

Didn't see this before I posted. Bingo.

Posted

Carrier was not the player to expose.  Foligno, Larrson maybe.  Ennis sux. Protecting Ulmark at the expense of Carrier was not good evaluation.  Sign Nilson and draft your future.   I was not high on Bobblehead from what I was told by people in the Pens organization....great admin not a great eye for talent.  I would have used this opportunity to try and shed a contract and that,  at the moment doesn't seem to be the case.  

You think Carrier is better than Larrson and Foligno? I disagree. Also, you think it's easy to dump bad contracts?

Posted (edited)

Who, besides me, thinks that Carrier starts the season in Chicago (AHL) or somewhere other than Nevada?


You think Carrier is better than Larrson and Foligno? I disagree. Also, you think it's easy to dump bad contracts?

 

He is not better than either of them, but he is certainly cheaper.  Thus the appeal to Vegas.  They needed some cheap contracts, too. All three of them are JAGs, but Carrier is cheap.

Edited by Eleven
Posted

Who, besides me, thinks that Carrier starts the season in Chicago (AHL) or somewhere other than Nevada?

 

He is not better than either of them, but he is certainly cheaper.

I prefer better players

Posted

Worst overpayment by a Sabres GM:

A late first for a goalie with the 12th best save percentage in the NHL?

A late second for a goalie with the 24th best save percentage in the AHL?

A late 2nd?

Posted (edited)

Our defense in Rochester was the AHL equivalent of our NHL defense in Buffalo last year. He was no.1 in the league in shots faced so I'm guessing that had something to do with it.

 

It's not a sexy answer but I think he just passes the eye test when we'e seen him in Buffalo. At worst he's a capable back-up but I'd like to see what he can do.

Agreed. We also don't know if Lehner is good enough, or where Peterson will go. Carrier is expendable Edited by WildCard
Posted

You think Carrier is better than Larrson and Foligno? I disagree. Also, you think it's easy to dump bad contracts?

i definitely disagree. Foligno would have been the logical choice. And if it is so hard to move contracts explain CBJ. They were able to move dead weight. Foligno is gonna want a raise he doesn't remotely,deserve and has stone hands to go with the cement between his ears. He doesn't fit up tempo anything.
Posted

i definitely disagree. Foligno would have been the logical choice. And if it is so hard to move contracts explain CBJ. They were able to move dead weight. Foligno is gonna want a raise he doesn't remotely,deserve and has stone hands to go with the cement between his ears. He doesn't fit up tempo anything.

Foligno is perfect at the price he's at right now. Even if he gets a raise, which I don't think he's in position to demand, it will be small enough where I'd be way, way more upset than losing Will freaking Carrier
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...