Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

The only bad thing about the Carrier loss was that it wasn't one of our garbage contracts. Otherwise, he was a dime a dozen. Anyone know how VDKs are going to meet the cap floor?

Edited by kas23
Posted

Wasn't high on gm Bobblehead to begin with. This confirms my intel.  In pgh he had little input into talent eval.  Just how much they could afford.

How does this confirm your intel?

Posted

How does this confirm your intel?

Carrier was not the player to expose.  Foligno, Larrson maybe.  Ennis sux. Protecting Ulmark at the expense of Carrier was not good evaluation.  Sign Nilson and draft your future.   I was not high on Bobblehead from what I was told by people in the Pens organization....great admin not a great eye for talent.  I would have used this opportunity to try and shed a contract and that,  at the moment doesn't seem to be the case.  

Posted

Sure, once someone tells me why I should care about a goalie who was 24th in the AHL in SV%.

Had I argued for keeping any one of our exposed players, I'd gladly tell you. But since I did not, I can't help ya.

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...