Jump to content

NHL Network..... Jack Eichel rated #8


Claude Balls

Recommended Posts

I watch NHL Network practicly all day everyday but I missed this. I'm assuming the list was players 20 and under or something to that affect? They must not understand the point per game stat. Oh well, next season they'll have no choice but to give him credit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDavid #1, Matthews #2......go ###### yourself NHL. Who's better than Jack? Laine maybe, but #8??? ###### off

 

Sorry no link, but it was just on NHL Network Live at 2:30 a.m.

#8 What?

 

Crap way to start a thread. Seems no one is sure what he's the 8th at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHLN is nothing but a shill for Canadian hockey. It goes to great lengths to promote TO interests and all things Canada.

I agree but as far as daily league wide highlights are concerned, NHL Tonight and On the Fly can't be beat. It also has some really cool countdown series as well. Also awesome on draft day (tsn coverage feed) and trade deadline every year.

 

Not to mention all the IIHF coverage every year. Biased yes but darn good channel for puck heads.

Edited by Saratoga Sabres Fan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDavid, Crosby, Karlson, Burns, Kane, Lundquist....hard to imagine it isn't age biased. Thus, McDavid, Matthews, Nylander, Marner, Laine, Werenski Jack as the best under 20 or some such thing. Either way, it is a meaningless exercise. Time will tell us who are the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trying to find a link, but don't see anything. I'm not sure whether it was by age or PPG or something else. But from what I remember, they rated Jack as 8th best player overall in the NHL.

8th best player in the league is way too generous imo. And he's my favorite current NHL player. #8 best forward maybe, still a bit generous. Another year or so though yeah absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McDavid #1, Matthews #2......go ###### yourself NHL. Who's better than Jack? Laine maybe, but #8??? ###### off

Sorry no link, but it was just on NHL Network Live at 2:30 a.m.

Figure Larkin is probably one of the others rated above him which is really funny after Larkin's serious sophomore slump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But someone said Crosby was #1. So it can't be a young kids thing.

Jack is the 2nd best U21 talent, third at worst (but that's wrong.)

The OP said McClavicle was 1 and Matthews 2 in the show he watched. The Crosby thing was somebody speculating about/watching a different ranking show. NHL Network only has about 30,000 of them, and because there are so many they necessarily contradict themselves quite often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...