Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Crazy stuff...NHL Linesman Don Henderson, who got smoked from behind by Dennis Wideman a while back, is suing the player for 10 million dollars! The team, Calgary Flames, are also named in the suit.

 

Of course there was the issue of whether Wideman did it on purpose at the time and that remains a hotly debated subject (sure looked like he did it on purpose). Henderson has not been in a game since and his career is in jeopardy.

 

Rumors are that the NHL thought he had become a liability and his work was failing and open to debate as to whether he was doing a job worthy of the NHL. This should get real ugly I would think. Very interesting indeed...

Posted

Crazy stuff...NHL Linesman Don Henderson, who got smoked from behind by Dennis Wideman a while back, is suing the player for 10 million dollars! The team, Calgary Flames, are also named in the suit.

 

Of course there was the issue of whether Wideman did it on purpose at the time and that remains a hotly debated subject (sure looked like he did it on purpose). Henderson has not been in a game since and his career is in jeopardy.

 

Rumors are that the NHL thought he had become a liability and his work was failing and open to debate as to whether he was doing a job worthy of the NHL. This should get real ugly I would think. Very interesting indeed...

Link? I didn't realize at the time that Henderson was severely injured(?) during the altercation.  Hmm.

Posted

Why is the NHL not named in this lawsuit?

 

Ultimately can't this boil down to a workers compensation issue?  He's an employee who is injured on the job.  

 

Maybe there is a workers compensation case as well?

 

I don't know.  It's ugly.

Posted

Why is the NHL not named in this lawsuit?

 

Ultimately can't this boil down to a workers compensation issue? He's an employee who is injured on the job.

 

Maybe there is a workers compensation case as well?

 

I don't know. It's ugly.

I'm pretty far from being an employment attorney, but I'd guess these two are both the answer to your second question. Workers comp covers the NHL's liability, but not Wideman's and the Flames.

Posted

I'm pretty far from being an employment attorney, but I'd guess these two are both the answer to your second question. Workers comp covers the NHL's liability, but not Wideman's and the Flames.

 

We don't know if worker's comp covers the NHL, even.  We don't know what the CBA says about choice of law.  If it's silent, it's likely Alberta law would apply (that's where it happened), and I couldn't begin to tell you anything about Alberta worker's comp laws.

 

I do know this--maybe it's a good thing the Sabres never signed Wideman!

This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...