SwampD Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 (edited) So was the 125 yards passing because tyrod is that bad, or is it because we have the most conservative coaching staff in the league again? I thought there were some post-game comments that implied that they had more in the game plan but it just didn't happen. They didn't say if it was TT's fault (just not seeing the throws) or the receivers' fault (wrong routes), though. Game two of a new coaching staff, I'm not surprised that everyone isn't on the same page yet. Edited September 21, 2017 by SwampD
LGR4GM Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 (edited) Here's a mock draft for ya https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2018-nfl-mock-draft-six-wrs-in-round-1-steelers-grab-leveon-bell-replacement/ I don't like that he isn't under center a lot and I don't like the clap for the hike. I do like his pocket awareness and his ability to keep his eyes down field. He also changes the play a few times at the line and may recognize or have some experience with defensive reads. His intermediate throws are good. His long balls are okay, occasional misses but a 40yrd bomb might have that. He is 6'5" so he's able to see well over the O line. Far higher on the list right now than Josh Allen. Mason Rudolph is an okay name. Edited September 21, 2017 by LGR4GM
WildCard Posted September 21, 2017 Author Report Posted September 21, 2017 (edited) Good in the pocket, pass first, can survey the field, pretty accurate. Has a meh arm though, and seems to only ever be in the shotgun Rosen Darnold Rudolph Who gives a ###### Edited September 21, 2017 by WildCard
That Aud Smell Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Here's a mock draft for ya https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/news/2018-nfl-mock-draft-six-wrs-in-round-1-steelers-grab-leveon-bell-replacement/ As always with mocks, I think there are too few QBs going early. I wonder: Are mocks what the writer thinks should happen or will happen? I mean: Are the the Browns really going to stand pat with Kizer?
LGR4GM Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 As always with mocks, I think there are too few QBs going early. I wonder: Are mocks what the writer thinks should happen or will happen? I mean: Are the the Browns really going to stand pat with Kizer? I think the Browns will give Kizer another year. They needed so much talent you can't expect a Rookie QB to succeed there.
The Dominator Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Alright so Bills-related fantasy football question... My RBs consist of Shady, Dalvin Cook, Mike Gillislee, and that Carson guy for Seattle. The league is non-PPR. I'm really considering putting in Gillislee for Shady. Denver is giving up only 52 yards rushing per game including shutting down Zeke. I could see Shady's day being similar to how it was last week. With that being said, most people have a hard time benching their top fantasy player because of matchups. Also, Shady has historically been much more productive at home rather than away. For example, last season Shady had 770 yards rushing and 11 TDs at home compared to 547 yards and 2 TDs away. So, stick it out with Shady in a bad matchup or pull the trigger and put TD Mike in for Shady?
That Aud Smell Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 ^ I trust McCoy was your top pick. I stand by those core rules of FFB. One of them: Never sit your studs. Never. The other one I always try to keep in mind: No one cares about your FFB team.* *I mean that for situations other than ones like this one where you're posting a request for feedback, advice. What I work to avoid is telling tales that are ONLY of interest to me (and maybe people in my leagues) about how ... "holy cow, that one garbage time TD after 7:00 pm on a Sunday was HILARIOUS. My buddy Stewart lost his mind on that one because he thought he had the game won." No one cares. No one.
SwampD Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 ^ I trust McCoy was your top pick. I stand by those core rules of FFB. One of them: Never sit your studs. Never. The other one I always try to keep in mind: No one cares about your FFB team.* *I mean that for situations other than ones like this one where you're posting a request for feedback, advice. What I work to avoid is telling tales that are ONLY of interest to me (and maybe people in my leagues) about how ... "holy cow, that one garbage time TD after 7:00 pm on a Sunday was HILARIOUS. My buddy Stewart lost his mind on that one because he thought he had the game won." No one cares. No one. No, it applies here, as well.
Samson's Flow Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 ^ I trust McCoy was your top pick. I stand by those core rules of FFB. One of them: Never sit your studs. Never. The other one I always try to keep in mind: No one cares about your FFB team.* *I mean that for situations other than ones like this one where you're posting a request for feedback, advice. What I work to avoid is telling tales that are ONLY of interest to me (and maybe people in my leagues) about how ... "holy cow, that one garbage time TD after 7:00 pm on a Sunday was HILARIOUS. My buddy Stewart lost his mind on that one because he thought he had the game won." No one cares. No one. Stewart cares, I promise you.
The Dominator Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Who does Gillislee play? Pats play Houston (Houston has given up 118 yards rushing per game against Jags and Bengals). Of course, Gillislee's value comes in goal line duties and milking games in the 4th quarter. ^ I trust McCoy was your top pick. I stand by those core rules of FFB. One of them: Never sit your studs. Never. The other one I always try to keep in mind: No one cares about your FFB team.* *I mean that for situations other than ones like this one where you're posting a request for feedback, advice. What I work to avoid is telling tales that are ONLY of interest to me (and maybe people in my leagues) about how ... "holy cow, that one garbage time TD after 7:00 pm on a Sunday was HILARIOUS. My buddy Stewart lost his mind on that one because he thought he had the game won." No one cares. No one. Yeah he was. I kind of feel obligated to play Shady no matter the matchup. Also, it seems like the one time you sit your stud player based on matchup is when he goes off for a huge game.
That Aud Smell Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 No, it applies here, as well. Hahahaha - so good. Stewart cares, I promise you. Fookin' Stew. For sure. Pats play Houston (Houston has given up 118 yards rushing per game against Jags and Bengals). Of course, Gillislee's value comes in goal line duties and milking games in the 4th quarter. Yeah he was. I kind of feel obligated to play Shady no matter the matchup. Also, it seems like the one time you sit your stud player based on matchup is when he goes off for a huge game. Every damn time. Every time.
Eleven Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Well, I benched Newton for Rivers for this week, so we'll test that theory.
That Aud Smell Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Well, I benched Newton for Rivers for this week, so we'll test that theory. Newton's an amazing talent, but he's not what I would consider a fantasy stud. He's been erratic over the past several seasons -- last year was a stinker (he might have finished outside the top-20 of FFB QBs), whereas the year before that he was amazing (he may have been #1). If I'd drafted Newton, I'd be playing him based on match-ups. Rivers is a better play this weekend.
erickompositör72 Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 What's worse, politics or FFB talk in this thread?
WildCard Posted September 21, 2017 Author Report Posted September 21, 2017 What's worse, politics or FFB talk in this thread? Politics
That Aud Smell Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 What's worse, politics or FFB talk in this thread? Close frickin' call.
shrader Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 Close frickin' call. We could fixate on Mahomes again.
The Dominator Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 What's worse, politics or FFB talk in this thread? Close frickin' call How about this: With Buffalo's inability to stretch the field and open up space underneath, defenses are more likely to crowd the line of scrimmage. Given that Denver has a prolific group of cornerbacks in their secondary, they are even more likely to play man coverage on the boundaries, leaving them the option to leave more personnel in the box. How do you think this will effect Buffalo's offense? Will they attempt to open up the field more? Even if they attempt to open up the field more, will it change how Denver defends Buffalo's offense? How does all of this effect McCoy?
North Buffalo Posted September 21, 2017 Report Posted September 21, 2017 (edited) Depend if Taylor will throw the ball quickly. McCoy i predict pain.., Edited September 21, 2017 by North Buffalo
nfreeman Posted September 22, 2017 Report Posted September 22, 2017 Does anyone not think the Bills are going to get crushed by Denver?
inkman Posted September 22, 2017 Report Posted September 22, 2017 Does anyone not think the Bills are going to get crushed by Denver? The Bills brothers (rochester media types) had a majority with the Bills winning because it's a trap game for Denver. Watch the Bills screw this season up and win 7 games.
Eleven Posted September 22, 2017 Report Posted September 22, 2017 Nickell Robey seems to be having a pleasant evening.
JujuFish Posted September 22, 2017 Report Posted September 22, 2017 Nickell Robey seems to be having a pleasant evening. Robert Woods has 6 receptions for 108 yards, Sammy has 5 for 93 and a TD. Also, Gurley is making my SabreSpace fantasy team proud tonight. Maybe I'll finally get my first win of the season.
Recommended Posts