Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Even with those possession numbers?

Honestly haven't looked it up. A 2nd means nothing to me right now for the potential of Lazar. Don't we have a ton of 2nd / 3rds anyways?

Posted

GMTM is going to trade Minny's 2nd for Lazar now isn't he?

Please no

  

 

I think I'd been the only one happy with that trade.

 

I'd do that.

 

  

 

Or maybe not.

 

 

Honestly haven't looked it up. A 2nd means nothing to me right now for the potential of Lazar. Don't we have a ton of 2nd / 3rds anyways?

I mean if the guy isn't the player he was touted to be, at least we've replaced Catenacci.

Posted (edited)

It's hard to put into words just how bad Lazar has been as a pro, but I'm going to try anyway: he's been Nic Deslauriers with a better draft pedigree.

And that has nothing to do with the line he's stuck on? He had a great rookie year

Edited by WildCard
Posted

And that has nothing to do with the line he's stuck on? He had a great rookie year

Chicken/egg. After his rookie year, really think he'd have been left to rot if his performance didn't fall off a cliff?

 

I'll take him for a 4th.

Posted

It's hard to put into words just how bad Lazar has been as a pro, but I'm going to try anyway: he's been Nic Deslauriers with a better draft pedigree.

This is why I wouldn't give up a 2nd for him.

Posted

It's hard to put into words just how bad Lazar has been as a pro, but I'm going to try anyway: he's been Nic Deslauriers with a better draft pedigree.

Yeah, but he's 4 years younger and went straight from Juniors (where he put up better numbers) to the big show. That's a much better trajectory than D-Lo. 

Posted (edited)

Chicken/egg. After his rookie year, really think he'd have been left to rot if his performance didn't fall off a cliff?

 

I'll take him for a 4th.

0-1-1 in 33 gp, with a -10 rel Corsi%, a 39% corsi, and 41% fenwick

 

Ouch

Edited by WildCard
Posted

Yeah, but he's 4 years younger and went straight from Juniors (where he put up better numbers) to the big show. That's a much better trajectory than D-Lo. 

 

Steeper on the upslope.... steeper on the downslope.

 

Not interested.

Posted

Steeper on the upslope.... steeper on the downslope.

 

Not interested.

I think he's exactly the kind of player you buy low if a team is down on him like he is this year. I think Ottawa won't give up on him, which is why he won't be had at a low price. I'd still give a 2nd for him though. I think his potential is high enough.  

Posted

I agree he's been awful. Loved the kid as a junior though.

I'm with D4rk on the buy-low - pick 55 in a draft for a 21-year-old who has already played a lot in the NHL?

Worth a gamble for me.

Posted

It's hard to put into words just how bad Lazar has been as a pro, but I'm going to try anyway: he's been Nic Deslauriers with a better draft pedigree.

0-1-1 in 33 gp, with a -10 rel Corsi%, a 39% corsi, and 41% fenwick

 

Ouch

 

Yuck.

Posted

Love the idea of Lazar but I wonder if that could ever happen.

 

We'd like Lazar please....

 

I would overpay for Lazar. That kid is the type of player you win with.

 

I'm not surprised. Kid is manly.

 
There's more.  So many more.
This topic is OLD. A NEW topic should be started unless there is a VERY SPECIFIC REASON to revive this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...