pi2000 Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 Well, that's basically my point. If he's playing Ryan O'Reilly's game, then playing him with Grant isn't "sheltering him". It's just playing him with a boat anchor. If anything, it's making more work for him. I'll bet Grant finishes the game a plus tonight. Quote
Randall Flagg Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 I'll bet Grant finishes the game a plus tonight. If he does, it'd be because O'Reilly did everything by himself. Maybe with some help from Gionta. Quote
pi2000 Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 If he does, it'd be because O'Reilly did everything by himself. Maybe with some help from Gionta. ..and the fact Grant a superior defensive player when compared to Okposo or Kane. Quote
Randall Flagg Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 (edited) ..and the fact Grant a superior defensive player when compared to Okposo or Kane. What defensive qualities make him better than Kane? Do you value Grant as an NHL player at all? Since he's a PK specialist on the worst PK in the league and has zero goals ever? Edit: Also, his +/- is worse than Okposo's...since apparently a difference of one integer value matters in differentiating between their defensive abilities. Edited January 5, 2017 by Randall Flagg Quote
3putt Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 I'll bet Grant finishes the game a plus tonight. Through no effort ofnhis own. He is an empty jersey. He forces the team to work harder because they are for all intents and purposes short-handed when he is on the ice and down 2 when he is on the pk. And your stat about +/- is bull because it doesn't factor the number of goals he is on for on the pk which is why he was given a spot in the first place. Quote
MODO Hockey Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 Well then, once upon a time.. ahh fack it, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhkE8O2e5RE Quote
LTS Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 Through no effort ofnhis own. He is an empty jersey. He forces the team to work harder because they are for all intents and purposes short-handed when he is on the ice and down 2 when he is on the pk. And your stat about +/- is bull ###### because it doesn't factor the number of goals he is on for on the pk which is why he was given a spot in the first place. If that were true Vesey would be less sore today. But yea.. other than that.. useless. :) Quote
pi2000 Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 What defensive qualities make him better than Kane? Do you value Grant as an NHL player at all? Since he's a PK specialist on the worst PK in the league and has zero goals ever? Edit: Also, his +/- is worse than Okposo's...since apparently a difference of one integer value matters in differentiating between their defensive abilities. Kane is a -8 last time I checked. Grant is superior in his own end. I like Grant's defensive game, his ability to battle for loose pucks in his own end, and he makes smarts plays when he does gain possession. Sure it's not sexy, but an effective cog that makes the team successful. Through no effort ofnhis own. He is an empty jersey. He forces the team to work harder because they are for all intents and purposes short-handed when he is on the ice and down 2 when he is on the pk. And your stat about +/- is bull ###### because it doesn't factor the number of goals he is on for on the pk which is why he was given a spot in the first place. Grant is the grey in an office cubicle, a magazine in a doctors waiting room, closed captions on c-span ... he's a boring, everyday average guy who just does what he does, nothing more, nothing less. Underappreciated by some, despised by most.... all he does is show up everyday and do the job he's asked to do. Is anybody buying any of this yet? Quote
darksabre Posted January 5, 2017 Report Posted January 5, 2017 Sorry for shouting. The anti-DD in every thread gets old. Especially when he's doing the right thing. He's sheltering him by not putting him on the ice all that much. Is this really that hard of a concept? Hard minutes are hard minutes. The quantity really doesn't seem important at all. Either he's recovered or he's not. It's not a conditioning or talent thing. Quote
inkman Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Kane is a -8 last time I checked. Grant is superior in his own end. I like Grant's defensive game, his ability to battle for loose pucks in his own end, and he makes smarts plays when he does gain possession. Sure it's not sexy, but an effective cog that makes the team successful. Grant is the grey in an office cubicle, a magazine in a doctors waiting room, closed captions on c-span ... he's a boring, everyday average guy who just does what he does, nothing more, nothing less. Underappreciated by some, despised by most.... all he does is show up everyday and do the job he's asked to do. Is anybody buying any of this yet? :Thumbsup: Quote
Beer Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 (edited) Kane is a -8 last time I checked. Grant is superior in his own end. I like Grant's defensive game, his ability to battle for loose pucks in his own end, and he makes smarts plays when he does gain possession. Sure it's not sexy, but an effective cog that makes the team successful. Grant is the grey in an office cubicle, a magazine in a doctors waiting room, closed captions on c-span ... he's a boring, everyday average guy who just does what he does, nothing more, nothing less. Underappreciated by some, despised by most.... all he does is show up everyday and do the job he's asked to do. Is anybody buying any of this yet? What is this success that you speak of? Last I checked we stink. Overall I find this discussion on Grant absurd... maybe his +/- wouldn't look so great if PK goals counted against it. He's an AHLer getting time on a team that doesn't have a full NHL roster, period. I call that living the dream. Edited January 6, 2017 by Beer Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 6, 2017 Author Report Posted January 6, 2017 How ready are you for this game, MODO? Well then, once upon a time.. ahh fack it, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qhkE8O2e5RE Quote
TrueBlueGED Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Gorges in for Falk. Defense downgraded, but at least McCabe-Risto are staying together. Quote
MattPie Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Grant gets a reprieve for levelling Vesey, but to win hockey games you need to score goals. Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 6, 2017 Author Report Posted January 6, 2017 Grant gets a reprieve for levelling Vesey, but to win hockey games you need to score goals. Calling it: Grant with a goal tonight. Quote
Brawndo Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 The lineup ROR in Gorges on the 3rd pairing with Fedun. Risto and McCabe the 1st pairing Thank You Jeezbus! Quote
Tondas Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 Gorges in for Falk. Defense downgraded, but at least McCabe-Risto are staying together. Must be for "veteran leadership" because it's not for recent performance. Quote
Iron Crotch Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 I place my faith in Nilsson. Son of Nils. Lets Go Buffalo!!! Quote
Randall Flagg Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 As much as I hate Gorges, there's no justifying to the locker room that Falk should play over him. Not sure what the stats say. I like him with Fedun. Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 6, 2017 Author Report Posted January 6, 2017 (edited) And Grant's on the 4th line. Edited January 6, 2017 by Doohickie Quote
Randall Flagg Posted January 6, 2017 Report Posted January 6, 2017 And Grant's on the 4th line.I win the avatar bet that no one took up, before the game even started! Guess I'll just choose my avatar Quote
Doohicksie Posted January 6, 2017 Author Report Posted January 6, 2017 I win the avatar bet that no one took up, before the game even started! Guess I'll just choose my avatar Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.